1 / 14

Red-Light Running Cameras

Red-Light Running Cameras. Safety Measure or Economic Boon? Presented by: Stephen Holland. Red-Light Running Cameras (RLRs). Should be used for safety purposes Very few cities are following this guideline Most RLR camera systems are used to: Pad the bottom line revenues of cities

shamira
Download Presentation

Red-Light Running Cameras

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Red-Light Running Cameras Safety Measure or Economic Boon? Presented by: Stephen Holland

  2. Red-Light Running Cameras (RLRs) • Should be used for safety purposes • Very few cities are following this guideline • Most RLR camera systems are used to: • Pad the bottom line revenues of cities • Maximize the profits of RLR system support companies.

  3. Definition: Red Light Runner

  4. How do RLR Camera Systems Work? Click Here to Find Out

  5. IIHS Statistics (U.S.) Accidents caused by Red-Light Violators • Approx. 260,000 accidents • 22% of all accidents in the U.S. • 1200 injuries • 800 deaths

  6. Ideal Benefits of RLR Systems • Penalize Red-Light Runners • RLRs stop running red-lights • Danger averted or reduced for those who obey the laws • Revenue for the city

  7. PROBLEM! • Revenue for the city • Penalize Red-Light Runners • RLRs stop running red-lights • Danger averted or reduced for those who obey the laws

  8. Case Study - San Diego, CA Profit Motive • Short or Shortened Yellow-Light Duration • Less than 4 Seconds (Preferred) • Downhill Approaches • High Traffic Volume • Created ITS or Dilemma Zone

  9. Case Study - San Diego, CA (cont.) Profit Motive • Several Hundred Cases Thrown Out • RLR Cameras reinstituted • Increased Yellow Light Timing • RLR Rate drop from 3,000/month to 200/month • That’s an 85% drop due to yellow light timing increase of 2.5 seconds!

  10. Case Study – Lakewood, WA Safety Motive • Proper Yellow Light Duration • Reduced Overall RLR Rate by 60% • Reduced the worst Intersection RLR Rate by 85%! • Lost $200,000!

  11. Recommendations - Texas Properly Engineer Traffic Signals and Timing • Proper Yellow Light Length • All Way Red Pauses • Proper Timing • Award those who drive the limit with greens • Ensure that RLRs are not rewarded with greens • Time of day MATTERS!!

  12. Recommendations – Texas (cont.) If RLR Cameras are to be used: • Base intersection selection on safety • Do not expect a profit (Electronic Guardrails) • No contingency fees for RLR Camera Companies (Pay fixed rate)

  13. Conclusions • Profit motive is predominate • Safety motive must be encouraged • Guardrails do not turn profits so why should RLR Camera Systems • Properly Engineered Intersections rarely need cameras • Pick Lives over Money!!

  14. THANK YOU QUESTIONS? For a copy of Stephen Holland’s Report visit http://www.stephenholland.com/rlr_report/report.doc

More Related