1 / 18

报告人:蔡世民 合作者:禚钊,乔赫元,傅忠谦,周佩玲 电子科学与技术系

Cluster structure and localization of brain functional networks based on the ERP signals of auditory task. 报告人:蔡世民 合作者:禚钊,乔赫元,傅忠谦,周佩玲 电子科学与技术系. Outline. Introduction Data Acquisition Phase Synchronization Results. Introduction. What is brain functional networks?

Download Presentation

报告人:蔡世民 合作者:禚钊,乔赫元,傅忠谦,周佩玲 电子科学与技术系

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Cluster structure and localization of brain functional networks based on the ERP signals of auditory task 报告人:蔡世民 合作者:禚钊,乔赫元,傅忠谦,周佩玲 电子科学与技术系

  2. Outline • Introduction • Data Acquisition • Phase Synchronization • Results

  3. Introduction • What is brain functional networks? A brain functional network can be derived from the physiological signals such as EEG,MEG, ECoG, and fMRI. Nodes: ROIs (fMRI) or channels (EEG,MEG,ECoG). Edges : correlation (interaction) between ROIs or channels.

  4. Introduction (cont.) • Construction of large-scale brain functional networks --Pearson correlation coefficient --Correlation coefficient based on Wavelet transform --Mutual information --Nonlinear interdependence --Phase synchronization based on Hilbert transform

  5. Introduction (cont.)

  6. Introduction (cont.) • Brain functional networks posses some common structures of complex networks --small-world property (D. S. Bassett, Neuroscientist 12, 512, 2006) --scale-free property (V. M. Eguiluz, et al. PRL 94, 018102, 2005) --Hierarchical organization (C. S. Zhou, et al. PRL 97, 238103, 2006)

  7. Data Acquisition • Five persons were asked to distinguish between synonymous and non-synonymous word pairs (the second word presented 1 second after the first) they heard. • Data epochs were extracted from 2 sec before the second word onset to 2 sec after the second word onset. • Sampling rate (Hz) 200.

  8. Data Acquisition (cont.) • 61-channel ERP signal. Letters refer to the main areas of the cortex: F: the frontal (额叶), T: left and right temporal (颞叶), P: the parietal (顶叶), O: the occipital (枕叶), C : central, FP: frontopolar(额极), AF: anterior frontal(前额叶).

  9. Data Acquisition (cont.) • The testee was cued to move a particular figure by displaying the corresponding word, such as “thumb”; • Each cue lasted two seconds following an another two seconds resting period; • Band pass filtered between 0.15 and 200 Hz, and sampled at 1000 Hz; • The experiment lasted 400 seconds for echa testee.

  10. Data Acquisition (cont.) Sketch of ECoG recording

  11. Phase Synchronization • Phase of real value time series • bivariate phase synchronization index If two time series are complete phase synchronized, this value will be the maximum.

  12. Generating Networks • Divide data into four parts:1st ,2nd ,3rd and 4th second. resting state: 1st and 4th seconds; auditory task state: 2nd and 3rd seconds • Fixed mean degree for four parts mean degree: 4-30,increased by 2. The thresholds as a function of mean degree ⟨k⟩.

  13. Generating Networks (cont.) • Divide data into two parts: -- task state: 1st 2 seconds -- resting: 2nd 2 seconds • Fixed mean degree for two parts --mean degree: 4-30,increased by 2. ECoG

  14. Results • Networks show different property during rest and task state for EEG

  15. Results (cont.) • Networks show different property during • rest and task state for ECoG

  16. Results (cont.)

  17. Results (cont.) ECoG EEG Networks show small-world property

  18. 6.Conclusion and outlook • The diversity of topology between the resting and task states suggests the variance of correlations among the functional modules. • The larger cluster coefficients during task mean that the correlations of cortex regions are more localized in the large-scale brain functional networks • The connectivity of networks under task state presents a better performance than that under resting state via the estimation of giant components’ sizes. • Moreover, the mean path lengths of brain functional networks confirm the small world property. • Future work will focus on the location of community during the cognitive process and the relationship between the large-scale functional networks and micro-scale neural dynamics via diffusion tensor imaging

More Related