1 / 28

Equilibrate System upgrade

This presentation showcases the collaborative efforts of the Equilibrate System team, led by Project Manager David Lahn, in upgrading the camera structure and foot plate designs. Key team members Sado Borcilo and Diana Rodriguez have contributed to crucial design elements and analyses. The agenda includes a review of customer needs, engineering specifications, functional decomposition, and detailed design outputs from prototypes. We will discuss potential design improvements, costs, and testing results, focusing on achieving optimal performance and cost-effectiveness. Join us for an insightful discussion on enhancing our current products.

shae
Download Presentation

Equilibrate System upgrade

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Equilibrate System upgrade RIT Open Presentation

  2. Group Members • David Lahn: Project Manager/Camera Structure Design • Sado Borcilo: Camera Structure Design • Diana Rodriguez: Foot Plate Track Design • Natalie Ferrari: Foot Plate Analysis and Design

  3. Agenda Current Product Customer Needs, Constraints Engineering Specifications Functional Decomposition Subassembly Details New Design Prototype Testing Detailed Design Outputs Results Recommendations Final System Comparison Questions

  4. Current Product Customer Needs N Constraints: E W S

  5. Specs CURRENT

  6. Function Decomposition

  7. Subassembly Division Component #1 Camera Structure Component #2 Foot Track Adjustability Component #3 Foot Plate Design

  8. Camera Structure Design Design Process Concept Development Feasibility Analysis Design Selection and Detail Design Creation BOM Creation Ordered Parts Prototype Build Prototype Alteration Testing

  9. New Design

  10. Prototype

  11. Test Results (Theoretical)

  12. Test Results (Actual)

  13. Plan to Meet Design Specifications

  14. Recommendations • Increase weight underneath vertical bar to compensate for full displacement of vertical bar. • Increase length of feet extensions • Possibly revert to T-shape structure, Y-shape does not save significant material.

  15. Foot Plate Track Design

  16. Prototype

  17. Plan to Meet Design Specifications

  18. Foot Plate Design

  19. Design Iterations Thin Plate Current Milled Design 1 Milled Design 2 Milled Design 3 Milled Design 4

  20. Selected Concept Using same aluminum, mill out material. Proposed Design

  21. Boundary Conditions and Force Top 0.1” diameter Bottom 0.1” diameter 0.5 from top 0.5 from side

  22. Design Feasibility

  23. Prototype Material: RMC Rochester Machining: Brinkman Lab

  24. Testing Experimental Set Up

  25. Results

  26. Plan to Meet Design Specifications

  27. Comparison of Proposed vs. Current Additional Cost Foot Plates $30 x 2 Foot Track $17.12 Camera Structure $165.48 - $587.64 = -$422.16 =$ -345.04 Estimated savings of $345.04 per unit.

  28. Discussion/Questions?

More Related