1 / 18

β decay of 69 Kr and 73 Sr and the rp process Bertram Blank CEN Bordeaux-Gradignan

β decay of 69 Kr and 73 Sr and the rp process Bertram Blank CEN Bordeaux-Gradignan. Motivation. 69 Kr – rp-Process Drip-Line Nucleus 69 Br Measurement of the 69 Br ground state. Constraints on the 68 Se rp- process “waiting point”. 73 Sr – rp-Process Drip-Line Nucleus 73 Rb

sezja
Download Presentation

β decay of 69 Kr and 73 Sr and the rp process Bertram Blank CEN Bordeaux-Gradignan

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. β decay of 69Kr and 73Sr and the rp process Bertram Blank CEN Bordeaux-Gradignan

  2. Motivation 69Kr – rp-Process Drip-Line Nucleus 69Br • Measurement of the 69Br ground state. • Constraints on the 68Se rp-process “waiting point”. 73Sr – rp-Process Drip-Line Nucleus 73Rb • Measurement of the 73Rb ground state. • Constraints on the 72Kr rp-process “waiting point”.

  3. 69Br and the rp process • The rapid proton, or rp process, is thought to mainly occur during Type I X-ray bursts (timescale of ~10-100 s). • Burst properties and nucleosynthesis of heavy nuclei is significantly influenced by “waiting-point” nuclei. • T1/2(68Se)=35.5s and 69Br is proton unbound. • How strongly can the 68Se waiting point be bypassed via 2p captures? • 2p-capture rate depends exponentially on Sp. • ⇒Need spectroscopy beyond the drip line. A. Rogers, ANL

  4. Previous measurements A. M. Rogers et al. P. Schury et. al • Non-observation: Upper limit on the 69Br lifetime estimated from 78Kr fragmentation cross sections T1/2<100 nsSp < -450 keV (Blank et al., 1995) T1/2<24 nsSp < -500 keV (Pfaff et al., 1996) • Indirect: High-precision penning trap mass measurements of 68Se and 69Se + CDE (Coulomb Displacement Energy) Sp= -636 105 keV (Brown et al., 2002; Schury et al., 2007; Savory et al., 2009) • Direct: Kinematic reconstruction of the 69Br protondecay Sp= -785+35-40 keV (A.M. Rogers et al., 2011)

  5. Populating 69Br via 69Kr β decay • Method: Populate the 69Br g.s. in the β decay of 69Kr and look at β-p correlations • Monoenergetic protons. • Clean and selective technique. • Problem: Decay to the Isobaric Analog State is favored over the g.s. -- X.J. Xu et al. Phys. Rev C 55, R533 (1997) • However, a few percent of the decay flux may go to the g.s.

  6. Setup CSS2 CSS1 LISE3 • Fragmentation of 78Kr primary beam. • E=70 MeV/A Intensity ~ 3-4 eμA. • Utilized the LISE3 spectrometer with an Al (100μm) degrader and a Wien filter. LISE Target: natNi 200 mg/cm2 EXOGAM Clovers • Implant-decay experiment using β-p and β-γ event tagging. • ToF from RF and MCP's. • Si detector for energy loss of heavy ions. • Heavy ions are implanted into a 16x16 strip DSSD (3 mm pitch, 500 μm thick). • γ's are measured using four germanium clover detectors. DSSSD E ToF ΔE MCP CENBG, GANIL, ANL

  7. Setup Fragmentation of 78Kr primary beam. E=70 MeV/A Intensity ~ 3-4 eμA. Utilized the LISE3 spectrometer with an Al (100μm) degrader and the Wien filter. • Identified 211 69Kr implantation events →87 69Kr/day. • Clean PID based on redundant identification parameters.

  8. Measurements of known half-lives • Known T1/2(62Ga) = 116.12 (23) ms. • Negligible additional decay components. • Known T1/2(67Se) = 136 (12) ms • So far there is good agreement with most easily measured half-lives.

  9. 65Se β decay preliminary results • Batchelder et al (Phys. Rev. C 47, 2038 1996) identified a single proton group at 3.55 (0.03) MeV. • We also observe a proton peak at an energy of 3.51 MeV.

  10. 69Kr β decay preliminary results

  11. 69Kr β decay preliminary results X. J. Xu et al, Phys. Rev. C 533, 1997 • Half-life previously measured by X.J. Xu et al, Phys. Rev. C R533, 1997 of T1/2=32 (10) ms. • Also claimed to observe a single proton group at 4.07 (0.05) MeV.

  12. 69Kr β decay proton spectrum • Half-life previously measured by X.J. Xu et al, Phys. Rev. C R533, 1997 of T1/2=32 (10) ms. • Also claimed to observe a single proton group at 4.07 (0.05) MeV. • We observe proton decays to excited states. • However, IAS is observed at E=2.97 MeV. • We do not observe 69Br ground-state proton decays.

  13. We observe proton decays to excited states. However, IAS is observed at E=2.97 MeV. We do not observe 69Br ground-state proton decays. 69Kr β decay preliminary results • Half-life previously measured by X.J. Xu et al, Phys. Rev. C R533, 1997 of T1/2=32 (10) ms. • Also claimed to observe a single proton group at 4.07 (0.05) MeV.

  14. Level Scheme

  15. 73Sr 73Rb 69Kr 72Kr 69Br 68Se Measurement aims: • Study of decay of 73Sr to 73Rb and 72Kr • Study of decay of 69Kr to 69Br and 68Se Known Properties: • 73Sr decay: - Proton line at 3.75(4) MeV assumed to be IAS (Batchelder et al., PRC48 (1993) 2593) • 73Rb: - half-life T1/2 < 30ns (Janas et al., PRL82 (1999) 295)

  16. Production: • 92Mo fragmentation at the FRS at 500 MeV/u, 4g/cm2, 9Be target, 5e9pps • expected rates: • 73Sr: 250 per day • 69Kr: 200 per day in same setting  5-7 days experiment  Factor of 5 more statistics than at GANIL for 69Kr  First data for 73Sr decay (beyond IAS) • setup: • DSSSD setup • Gamma-ray detection B. Fernandez-Dominguez et al.

  17. Correlation method • For any given implant there are uncorrelated decay events that follow implantation. • One of the events will be a true correlation while the others are false/uncorrelated. • SPATIAL CORRELATION: Requirement that the implant and decay occurs in the same DSSD pixel. • TIME CORRELATION:Requirement that the decay occurs within an adjustable time correlation window. • False correlations add to a randomly distributed continuous background.

More Related