1 / 10

Groundwater and Sediment-Related Benefits

Groundwater and Sediment-Related Benefits. Will Wheeler National Center for Environmental Economics October 2011. Introduction. In past rules, EPA has frequently augmented recreational and stated choice benefit estimates Examples:

sen
Download Presentation

Groundwater and Sediment-Related Benefits

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Groundwater and Sediment-Related Benefits Will Wheeler National Center for Environmental Economics October 2011 National Center for Environmental Economics

  2. Introduction • In past rules, EPA has frequently augmented recreational and stated choice benefit estimates • Examples: • Health benefits from contaminated groundwater in private drinking water wells • Cost savings from reduced dredging • Water storage and navigation • Cost savings from treating public water supplies • Not original studies, but comport with our dual mandate • We will talk more with OW National Center for Environmental Economics

  3. Groundwater—Nitrates in Drinking Water • Nitrates in drinking water are a health concern (especially methemoglobinemia or blue baby syndrome) • Changes in BMPs, nutrient application, and septic controls will result in lower concentrations of nitrates in groundwater • Drinking water quality in public systems is covered by SDWA (MCL of 10 mg/l), so we do not assume any benefits • Private wells are not covered, so these benefits were include in 2003 CAFO rule National Center for Environmental Economics

  4. CAFO Rule • Used USGS and other data to predict nitrate concentrations in private wells, based on • loadings from AFOs, fertilizer, air deposition, and septic • well depth • soil type • land use • regional dummies • Estimated number of people using private wells from Census • Valuation: Poe and Bishop (ERE 1999) for getting below the MCL plus DeZoysa 1995, Crutchfield et al. 1997 for lower increments

  5. GW-Challenges and Opportunities • Different data sources: • Using Bay Model inputs rather than CAFO regulatory inputs • Updated data (e.g., American Housing Survey instead of Census) • Regional instead of national analysis may limit some data availability • To the extent that some states are relying on point source controls, benefits will be lower, so we may focus resources on other states • Updated benefits: • Bergstrom, Boyle, Poe (2002) book • Loomis et al (JAAE 2009) • update existing meta-analysis with new studies • preference calibration approach

  6. Sediment

  7. Sediment • Existing practice in OW RIAs in three areas of sediment-related benefits • Dredging of navigable waterways • Dredging of reservoirs • Drinking water treatment • Reduced sediment loads lead to savings from avoided costs

  8. Dredging • For navigable waterways, OW uses Army Corps Dredging Information System • Has dredging project dates, costs, and amount of sediment dredged for all projects from 1995 to 2008 • Can calculate costs savings from lower sediment loads in future years • For reservoirs, OW uses Army Corps Reservoir Sedimentation Survey Information System • Has reservoir locations, uses, and sedimentation rates • Apply several dredging cycles and (regional) average costs for navigable waterways • Can calculate costs savings from lower sediment loads in future years

  9. Drinking water treatment • Match drinking water intakes to stream reaches • Estimate influent sediment loads • Use engineering costs to calculate • The cost of alum needed to treat sediment loads • The cost of sludge disposal (more alum = more sludge)

  10. Sediment—Challenges and Opportunities • Econometric versus engineering costs • Econometric estimates can account for flexibility • Technological change, hidden costs • Pizer and Kopp (2005), Burtraw (1999) • For CAFO rule, EPA used an econometric model (Holmes 1989, Land Econ) to calculate avoided costs • If data is available, we could check dredging frequency • We plan on investigating these issues and discussing with OW National Center for Environmental Economics

More Related