1 / 23

Clinical Evaluation of Novel Therapies in Haemophilia

Clinical Evaluation of Novel Therapies in Haemophilia. Dr. Anneliese Hilger Paul-Ehrlich-Institut. EHC Roundtable of Stakeholders Brussels, 7 December 2011 . Agenda Regulatory Background Drafting Process Clinical Trial Concept Efficacy+Safety Guideline Summary Open issues.

semah
Download Presentation

Clinical Evaluation of Novel Therapies in Haemophilia

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Clinical Evaluation of NovelTherapies in Haemophilia Dr. Anneliese Hilger Paul-Ehrlich-Institut EHC Roundtable of Stakeholders Brussels, 7 December 2011

  2. Agenda • Regulatory Background • Drafting Process • Clinical Trial Concept • Efficacy+Safety • Guideline • Summary • Open issues

  3. EU- Clinical Guidance • Note for Guidance - on the Clinical Investigation of Human Plasma Derived Factor VIII and IX Products (CPMP/BPWG/198/95) 1996, rev.1 2001- on the Clinical Investigation of Recombinant Factor VIII and IX Products (CPMP/BPWG/1561/99) 2001 • Core SPC- for Human Plasma Derived and Recombinant Coagulation Factor VIII Products (CPMP/BPWG/1619/99) 2000- for Human Plasma Derived and Recombinant Coagulation Factor IX Products (CPMP/BPWG/1625/99) 2000

  4. Regulatory Background • New European legal requirements (e.g. Paediatric Regulation, RMP) • Class review on inhibitor development (rFVIII products) • Concept on Revision of NfG/core SPC initiated in 2004/2005: - pharmacokinetic aspects - clinical studies in children - ITI - Risk management plan - coreSPC update (e.g. transmissible diseases) • EMA workshop on inhibitors 2006

  5. Drafting process Notes for Guidance on the Clinical Investigation and core SPCs of recombinant and plasma-derived FVIII and FIX: • first public consultation 2007 • Deadline comments 01/2008 • Stakeholder meeting 02/2008 • second public consultation 06/2009 • Deadline for comments 10/2009 • CHMP adoption in July 2011

  6. General aspects: • pre- and post authorisation clinical trials for - new marketing authorisations- authorised products where a significant change should be made • Patient population: Previously treated Patients (PTP >150EDs) severity: <1% FVIII; <2% FIX;immunocompetent • Stepwise approach:start with pk in adults/adolescents >12y, continue withefficacy and safety for 50 Exposure days, when data areavailable start with pk in children <12y; start with PUP studywhen data from children study is available

  7. Clinical Trial Concept FVIII Pre-authorisation Post-authorisation 50 PK in 12 PTP > 12y Efficacy+Safety (E+S) 50 PTP > 12y for 50 ED (12+38 patients) PMI:200 PTP for 100 ED (Patients from pre- Authorisation Studies can be followed up to 100 ED, „new“ PTP for 100 ED; at least 60 PTP <12y should be Included) Pre-defined sampling time points 20 PTP > 12y, 50 ED PK in 12 PTP 6-12y 25 Children(E+S) 6-12y (PTP) for 50 ED 50 PK in 12 0-6y 25 Children(E+S) 0-6y (>50ED) for 50 ED 20pts <12y, 50ED 50 PUP (E+S) for 50 ED 100 PUP;100EDpost-approval SmPC for novel products: restricted indication until data from 50 PUP (E+S) are available!

  8. Clinical Trial Concept FIX Pre-authorisation Post-authorisation 20 PK in 12 PTP > 12y Efficacy+Safety (E+S) 20 PTP > 12y for 50 ED (12+8 patients) PMI:50 PTP for 100 ED (Patients from pre- Authorisation Studies can be followed up to 100 ED, „new“ PTP for 100 ED; Pre-defined sampling time points 10 PTP > 12y, 50 ED PK in 10 PTP 6-12y 10 Children(E+S) 6-12y (PTP) for 50 ED 20 PK in 10 0-6y 10 Children(E+S) 0-6y (>50ED) for 50 ED 10pts <12y, 50ED 20 PUP (E+S) for 50 ED 20-40 PUP;100EDpost-approval SmPC for novel products: restricted indication until data from 50 PUP (E+S) are available!

  9. Efficacy • clinical response will be assessed by patient and physician(none, moderate, good, excellent) • Surgery5 patients with at least 10 surgeries (including major surgeries) =efficacy of haemostasis, blood loss, transfusion requirements + consumption (number of infusions and IU/kg per month and per year, as well as IU/kg per event (prophylaxis, on-demand, and surgery). • Continuous infusion12 PTP (<1%) undergoing elective major surgeriesinitial infusion rate based on clearance calculation

  10. Safety • PTPs are most suitable to study product-related immunogenicity • Modified Nijmegen method of Bethesda assay performed in a central laboratory • Inhibitor definitions: low titer >0,6 BU high titer > 5 BU • Inhibitor monitoring following a predefined schedule (baseline,ED 10-15; ED 50-75; ED 100)

  11. Key points • Guidelines + coreSPC • pd + rec FVIII • pd + rec FIX • Clinical concept comprising pre- and post authorisation trials • Staggered approach • Children to be investigated pre-authorisation • PK in adults, adolescents and children to be performed • PUP studies required for novel products (indication restricted) • Post marketing trials: predefined sampling points • ITI no longer within the scope of the guidelines • General principles should apply for all new Factor VIII and IX products including novel products • Guidelines: www.ema.europa.eu

  12. 0pen issues…. • Plasma-derived vs. recombinant products • Full-length vs. B-domain-deleted • Treatment of inhibitor patients (Inhibitor eradication) • Inhibitor prevention (e.g. early prophylaxis) • Modified Proteins = which might be the best ?

  13. Orphan Drug Designation for Haemophilia A Source: ema website

  14. Orphan Drug Designation for Haemophilia B Source: ema website

  15. Orphan drug designation • Orphan disease (HA approx. 0,6/10.000; HB approx. 0,1/10.000) • significant benefit for patients Market exclusivity • after granting of marketing authorisation • for 10 years • “similar” products will be not accepted

  16. Similar Medicinal Product?

  17. Concerns • first product getting MA must not be the optimal modification • Prolongation of T1/2 might be different • Immunogenicity profile might be different and might be detectable only after MA • Product developments without avail • Intention of European Legislative ?

  18. Paul Ehrlich

More Related