1 / 26

Berta Vall & Luis Botella FPCEE Blanquerna Ramon Llull University , Barcelona

Towards a Phenomenological Understanding of Meaning-Making Processes in Psychotherapy: Applicability of a Narrative Assessment Grid to Client Generated Narratives. Berta Vall & Luis Botella FPCEE Blanquerna Ramon Llull University , Barcelona BertaVC @ blanquerna.url.edu.

seda
Download Presentation

Berta Vall & Luis Botella FPCEE Blanquerna Ramon Llull University , Barcelona

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Towards a Phenomenological Understanding of Meaning-Making Processes in Psychotherapy: Applicability of a Narrative Assessment Grid to Client Generated Narratives Berta Vall & Luis Botella FPCEE Blanquerna Ramon Llull University, Barcelona BertaVC@blanquerna.url.edu

  2. The meaning-making process Constructionist Approach Relational Constructivist Personal + Interpersonal + Cultural Systemic Approach Cognitive Approach Narratives Assessment. Berta Vall & Luis Botella (2011)

  3. Goals • Self characterizations First goal • NA-Grid • Second goal Hypothesis • Differential patterns according client’s complain Narratives Assessment. Berta Vall & Luis Botella (2011)

  4. Self-characterization • I wantyou to write a character sketch of … (client’sname), just as if he werethe principal character in a play. Writeit as itmay be writtenby a friendwhoknewhimveryintimately and verysympathetically, perhapsbetterthananyonecouldknowhim. Be sure to write in thethirdperson. For example, startoutbysaying, “… is” Narratives Evaluation. Berta Vall (2010)

  5. Method • Participants 29 patients (26 women; 3 men) (SAAP) Group A & B Coherence • Instruments Narrative Content Narrative Process NA-Grid Intelligibility Narrative Position Self Narratives Assessment. Berta Vall & Luis Botella (2011)

  6. Results 1. Distribution categories NA-Grid 2. Comparison percentages both groups in each dimension Narratives Assessment. Berta Vall & Luis Botella (2011)

  7. Variety of Characters Objectivation * * Narratives Assessment. Berta Vall & Luis Botella (2011)

  8. Cognitive Subjectivation Intelligibility/Clarity * * Narratives Assessment. Berta Vall & Luis Botella (2011)

  9. Intelligibility/ Stability Metaphorisation * * Narratives Assessment. Berta Vall & Luis Botella (2011)

  10. Discussion Dimensions in which they differ Intelligibility Narrative Process Narrative Content Dimensions they share Coherence Narrative Position Self Narratives Assessment. Berta Vall & Luis Botella (2011)

  11. Discussion Patients whose complain is related to: depressed mood High scores on Objectivation Intelligibility/Clarity Variety of characters Constriction Perceptive Field = minimize incompatibilities Superficial Characteristics Narratives Assessment. Berta Vall & Luis Botella (2011)

  12. Discussion Patients whose complain is related to: anxiety High scores on Cognitive Subjectivation Metaphorisation Intelligibility/Stability (Segal, Williams & Teasdale, 2002) Rumination Sensorial / Emotional details Thoughts = Absolute Truth Narratives Assessment. Berta Vall & Luis Botella (2011)

  13. Discussion Dimensions in which they differ Intelligibility Narrative Process Narrative Content Dimensions they share Coherence Narrative Position Self Narratives Assessment. Berta Vall & Luis Botella (2011)

  14. Discussion Dimensions they share Coherence Narrative Position Self Narratives Assessment. Berta Vall & Luis Botella (2011) Reconstruction Occupy new Invalidation

  15. Limits and future researches • NA-Grid = “screening” • Increase studies self-characterizations ----- useful information therapeutic practice (Leite & Kuipper, 2008) • “Second step” Narratives Assessment. Berta Vall & Luis Botella (2011)

  16. Thank you for your attention Narratives Assessment. Berta Vall & Luis Botella (2011)

  17. Narratives Assessment. Berta Vall & Luis Botella (2011)

  18. Narratives Assessment. Berta Vall & Luis Botella (2011)

  19. Narratives Assessment. Berta Vall & Luis Botella (2011)

  20. Narratives Assessment. Berta Vall & Luis Botella (2011)

  21. Narratives Assessment. Berta Vall & Luis Botella (2011)

  22. Narratives Assessment. Berta Vall & Luis Botella (2011)

  23. Method • Procedure Interjudge Reliability (α Cronbach=0,8) Confiability Transferability Confirmability Reliability Validity Predictive precision (Jiménez, 2004) Narratives Assessment. Berta Vall & Luis Botella (2011)

  24. Constructionist Approach • Emphasize: cultural, contextual & relational character of self-narratives • Product of the position in a culturally available discourse • Move from the mental towards the social process Narratives Assessment. Berta Vall & Luis Botella (2011)

  25. Systemic Approach • Emphasize interactional and conversational processes (dualism individual/family) • Position client & family in a specific conversational context • Transformation dominant family stories or myths Narratives Assessment. Berta Vall & Luis Botella (2011)

  26. Cognitive Approach • Feeling of authorship is emphasized (conversational interact. / Self) • Alteration narrative function • Deconstruct saturated narration Narratives Assessment. Berta Vall & Luis Botella (2011)

More Related