390 likes | 410 Views
This study explores membrane extraction and adsorption techniques for separating biomolecules from multicomponent mixtures. It includes examples of antibiotic and protein separation, advantages of reactive extraction, experimental methods, and results.
E N D
Membrane Extractions and Adsorptions in Separation of Biomolecules from Multicomponent MixturesMd M Hossain*Department of Chemical & Petroleum Engineering, United Arab University, P.O. Box 15551, Al Ain, UAE *
Membrane extraction and adsorption from aqueous media Two examples of Biomolecule separation (A) Extraction of an antibiotic (Shengimycin) In a bench-scale Membrane Contactor And using an eco-friendly solvent system (B) Separation of a protein from its mixture With other proteins using a commercially Available Membrane Module
Overview • Brief introduction of the “target” compounds • Aims of the projects (A) and (B) • (A)Extraction & Reactive extraction • Results of the antibiotic system in the Module • (B) Results of the protein system in a commercially available adsorber • Concluding remarks from (A) and (B) • Future work
(A) Shengjimycin (an antibiotic) • It is a multicomponent antibiotic • Better pharmacokinetic properties (improved absorption and distribution of the antibiotic) • Intended applications for the treatment of - respiratory infections andurinary tract infections
Shengjimycin (SJM) • Produced by fermentation and can be separated by any of the available methods • Chromatography –based methods - High performance chromatography - Counter current chromatography - Works well in separating SJM - Some disadvantages
Disadvantages of the Method • Very expensive to prepare the samples and process large quantities of product • High consumption of toxic solvent • In situ product recovery difficult • Try a new method such as Reactive extraction
Advantages of Reactive Extraction • Extraction at natural pH ? • Higher productivity (in situ removal possible) • Less contamination (Non-dispersive contacting of phases in separation) • Smaller secondary waste production • Large scale modules (commercially available) • Efficient and selective separation
(A) Extraction of SJM • Determine a solvent system (less toxic solvent) for possible extraction at natural pH • Examine the solvent alone • Examine the reactive extraction • Evaluate the performance in a module: - high pH (close to fermentation pH) - at higher flow rate
Organic phase SJM Aqueous phase SJM Extraction (solvent only) • -Extraction of Shengjimycin (SJM) from the organic and aqueous phase (SJM) • Solubility must be high in the organic phase compared to the aqueous phase (SJM) • Organic phase? New? • By itself (organic alone)? Or • Need a “carrier” for better result Distribution Coefficient (DE) = CSJMorg/CSJMaq
Reactive Extraction (need a “carrier” C) • SJM-OH SJM+ + OH- • The mechanism with C (carrier): • C(org)+ SJM(aq)+ OH(aq) CSJM(org) • (CSJM) is transported and more soluble • In the organic phase • Select the carrier which forms a complex CSJM C Organic Phase with “carrier” C OH- + SJM Aqueous Phase (SJM and others
Experimental Procedure • First equilibrium experiment with solvent alone: (no carrier) • 2 solvents (Tributyl phosphate and sunflower oil) was tried DE is low (0.1-0.2) with solvent only • Extraction with carrier (Amberlite LA2) DE (Distribution coefficient) = CSJM, Org/CSJM, Aq CSJM = Concentration of SJM Or and Aq the organic and aqueous phases (Org -5ml) C CSJM Organic Phase OH- + SJM+ Aqueous Phase (Aq- 5ml)
A Organic phase ASJM Aqueous phase SJM Reactive extraction of SJM • Amberlite LA-2 (A) is a commercially available carrier • Forms an ionic pair with the Shengjimycin molecule A(org) + SJM(aq) ASJM(org) High DE Only requires small amounts of carrier
How does the HFMM work? Aqueous Organic Aqueous Phase (outlet) Organic Phase (outlet) CSJM SJM C Shellside Tube-side Organic Phase (inlet) Aqueous Phase (inlet) Hydrophobic Porous membrane
Carrier+Sunflower oil as a Solvent phase Sunflower oil worked successfully as a solvent With D E of value 3 - 4 In presence of the carrier, Amberlite-LA2 Compared to other solvents (kerosene) Being tried in the literature Sunflower oil system is considered nontoxic, less expensive and sustainable Upgraded to a bench-scale membrane module
Contacting in hollow fibres • Hollow Fibre Module C CSJM Reaction Occurs Aqueous CSJM Complex OH- +SJM + C (org) Organic Pore of Fibre
Experimental Procedure Hollow Fibre Module Set-Up • HFM experiments E (%) = (CSJM,Aq,initial – CSJM,Aq,final) CSJM,Aq,initial
Advantages of HFMM • Easy to install and operate • Require pressure on the aqueous side to stabilize the interfaces • Membranes are hydrophobic, hence allows only the organic to wet the pores and • The CSJM complex is transported to permeate through the membrane
HFMM Results (continued) Tributyl phosphate Sunflower oil
Conclusions • With sunflower oil alone, the percentage extraction of SJM is low (less than 10%-physical extraction) • The % extraction can be greatly improved by using less than 3-5% of Amberlite LA-2 as a carrier • An extraction of 70% was achieved in a small pilot scale module (hollow fibre membrane contactor) • This was achieved at a flowrate of 12-13 L/h within 3-4 hours at the natural pH of antibiotic
Recommendations and Future Work • Back-extraction of Shengjimycin from organic phase into another aqueous phase • Carry out HPLC analysis on the extracted Shengjimycin components • Determine the stability of the system e.g. how long the system can perform the extraction
(B) Adsorption of Proteins onan Ion- Exchange Membrane • Milk contains two major fractions: Caseins and whey • Milk whey • 20% milk proteins, the majors are: • a-lactalbumin (a-lac),b-lactoglobulin (b-lg), bovine serum albumin (BSA)
Membrane-based Particle-based Feed flow & pressure Feed flow & pressure Filtrate Filtrate Separation of Proteins
BACKGROUND • Membrane (commercially • Available) in the ion exchange • Proteins of interest:
Membrane Selection • Various types of • Membrane used • A commercial Anion • Exchange Membrane • Volume: 3.8 cm 3 • Membrane area: 75 cm 2 • Pore Size: 3 mm
Stand Clamps Reservoir of Feed Titration Stand Glass Blown Nipple Pump Inlet Leur lock fitting Peristaltic Pump Pump Outlet to Membrane EXPERIMENTAL LAYOUT
EXPERIMENTAL – General • Adsorption from aqueous solution • Desorption with salt solution • Concentration and volume varied • Feed volume = 100 ml solution • Flow rate = 15 ml/min • Natural pH (no adjustments)
EXPERIMENTAL – General • Protein adsorption from aqueous solution • At protein concentrations similar to whey • a-lac concentration: 1.28 mg/L • BSA concentration: 0.32 mg/L • b-lg concentration: 3.22 mg/L • Natural pH (no adjustments)
RESULTS – Single Component Initial Reservoir Volume: 100ml, Flow Rate: 15ml/min
RESULTS – Robustness Initial Reservoir Volume: 100ml, Flow Rate: 15ml/min
FUTURE WORK • Studies with “real” whey sample • Effect of minor components • Purification from eluted solution • HPLC analysis • Continuous process • Industrial conditions
Acknowledgements (Antibiotic work) - Kam Rothman Student from the department of Chemical & Materials Engineering, Univewrsity of Auckland, New Zealand - Professor Chenghang Sun of the • Institute of Medicinal Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Medical sciences, Beijing, PRC, for supplying the samples and references on Shengjimycin work
Acknowledgements(protein adsorpton work) • Collin Hendersen (Undergraduate student) • Ameera Fares (postgraduate student, UAE University) • Emirates Foundation (Abu Dhabi, UAE) Grant No. #2010/088, in the Science and Engineering Program. The authors also acknowledge the support from the UAE University. • supported by the Emirates