1 / 15

The 1 st Party System

The 1 st Party System. 1. Between 1783 and 1800, the new government of the United States faced the same political, economic , and constitutional issues that troubled the British government’s relations with the colonies prior to the Revolution. Assess the validity of this generalization. (80)

scout
Download Presentation

The 1 st Party System

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The 1st Party System

  2. 1. Between 1783 and 1800, the new government of the United States faced the same political, economic , and constitutional issues that troubled the British government’s relations with the colonies prior to the Revolution. Assess the validity of this generalization. (80) • 2. “ Our prevailing passions are ambition and interest; and it will be the duty of a wise government to avail itself of those passions, in order to make them subservient to the public good.” -Alexander Hamilton, 1787 • How was this viewpoint manifested in Hamilton’s financial program as Secretary of the Treasury? ( 71) • 3. Evaluate the relative importance of domestic and foreign affairs in shaping American politics in the 1790’s. (94)

  3. I. Washington and the 18th Century View of Party • April 14, 1789: GW receives word of (unanimous) election processions and parades followed trip to NYC (capital) public expressions of unity

  4. GW symbol of nation and unity above political party • Parties = faction = discord and confusion • Parties reflect and foment disunity • No concept of legitimate political opposition: parties tool of tyranny • Doc C • Const. intended to diminish/abolish factions; Ams painfully accept parties as necessary

  5. II. Hamilton and the Emerging Republican Opposition A. An Energetic Government • AH believed “energy” of Fed required to transform US from rural + agrarian urban + industrial • Reverse “excesses” of democracy through strong central gov

  6. B. Hamilton’s Reports • 1790 +1: 3 position papers laying out program • 1) Public CreditI (1790) Establish secure credit + pay off debt (yes) • 2) 2nd Public Credit: Create Bank of the United States (yes) • 3) Manufactures (1791): Stimulate manufacturing through protective tariffs, bounties, encourage immigration, internal improvements (no; but eventually)

  7. Hamiltonian policies (esp. #3) push TJ and JM to active opposition • Doc E • Increasingly saw AH and Feds as aristocratic + monocrats attempting to recreate England in Am • Came to see GW as senile pawn of younger AH (aide de camp in Rev) • To cleanse Fed threat mobilize organized opposition despite hatred of parties: temp. coalition to stop AH menace that would dissolve after success • Doc F and G

  8. JM took point in House, TJ behind scenes in Cabinet (Sec’y State) • GW limited polarization: most unwilling to believe his administration could be evil with the great hero at its head • But, increasingly GW was an AH partisan + divisions about how US should look grew • Doc H

  9. III. Anglomen and Gallomen A. The French Revolution • F Rev (was FR heir to AR?) and renewed B-F war ignited divide • GW declares neutrality • 1793: TJ resigns bc GW too pro-Brit • Anglomen and Gallomen fight over meaning AR • Doc D • Neutrality easy to declare, diff maintain: B+ F willing step on young, weak US

  10. B. Genet • Citizen Edmond Genet (1793) sent to US: acts as if US F satellite + staging ground for attacks on B and S appoints George Rogers Clark commander of army attempting to raise; demands GW call special session Congress to resolve Am policy toward F; threatens to go over GW’s head to Am people • Some success in raising money + troops, esp. among those who want to take more land

  11. C. British Provocation and Jay’s Treaty • B extend embargo to Carib, seize 250 Am ships, claim right to stop all AM ships on high seas to search for deserters (grab all sorts people) John Jay sent to negotiate • Jay has no cards to play basically gives up Am rights to high seas + allows B same power to regulate Am trade as under Navigation Acts (but gets withdrawal Western forts) • Jay burned in effigy

  12. GW throws weight behind Treaty, narrowly passes (evidence sectionalism and partisanship) • GW attack as partisan + corrupt • Va DR toast: call for speedy death • Still powerful enough guarantee JA election • Relations w/F disintegrate: revocation F-Am pact, negotiators sent to F XYZ Affair calls for war; even greater pol’l division (parties and society)

  13. IV. Alien and Sedition Acts (1798) • Increasingly paranoid style of politics: not just opponents but enemies of nation (traitors) • Doc S • War imminent, worst enemies w/in: Gallic devotees, supposed F armies in West, and immigrants sent by F to start a rev (esp. Catholic Irish) • Naturalized Irish voting DR Alien Act • Lengthened residency req from 5 to 14 yrs, empowered Pres to imprison or deport “enemy aliens” in case of war

  14. Sedition Act • Speak or print or write scandalous or malicious criticism of gov’t (even if true) heavy fine or prison • Used as weapon against DR papers • Mathew Lyon (Spitting Lyon): July ’98: libel vs. Adams pleads unconstitutionality: imprisoned, kept writing, elected to House (from jail), and in 1800 cast deciding vote for TJ • Enforcement of sedition loose (only 10 of 25 convicted), and # DR papers doubles

  15. V. Revolution of 1800 • Election of 1800 broke hold of Feds (except Judiciary) and rise of DRs • Successful, nonviolent transition of power from one party to another during period intense partisan rancor • Produced legitimacy of political opp. + opp. entitled to gain reins of power if established a strong following (although F and DR still hate + fear each other) • How? Deep belief and faith in Const. (and otherwise) checks on excessive power • Party now an additional check on power of gov: necessary evil

More Related