100 likes | 177 Views
Explore the journey of improving program planning and implementation in Southern Sudan through monitoring mortality rates, key indicators, and demographic data. Learn about challenges faced, lessons learned, and recommendations based on experiences since 1993. Discover methods, considerations, and strategies for effective emergency response and transitional programs in the region.
E N D
a pvo perspective lessons learned from southern sudan
background • long term emergency response & transitional programs • Tonj County since April 1993 • Gogrial County since April 1998 • routine nutrition monitoring & annual food economy assessment used to inform food security projections and program design • this work conducted within the context of post 1998 famine conditions and emerging issues with SPLA in 1999/2000.
background • could program planning & implementation be improved by monitoring mortality rates in conjunction with other key indicators • how to keep Sudan on donor agendas by being able to provide accurate information on severity of the emergency • decided to research monitoring CMR and U5MR in conjunction with routine nutrition surveys
survey • combined HH census with routine 30 cluster nutrition survey (done routinely every 6 months) • “harvest” was chosen to delineate a 1 year recall period • respondents were asked about • live births in previous 1 year (since the end of the last harvest) • persons living in the house before the last harvest • household members died since the last harvest, (including age, gender & cause – verbal autopsy)
challenges / lessons learned can it be done ?? planning • access to standardized methods for data collection and examples from literature • reliable demographic / population data (rapid changes in Sudan due to famine, migration, war) • lack of public HIS & insufficient secondary data • access issues introduced selection bias • cultural sensitivities and ethical implications
challenges / lessons learned implementation • translation / back translation • low sample size (adequate for nutrition, but not mortality) • qualifications of available enumerators (in Sudan staff have often not even completed primary school) • recall period / age & dates • intensive training required – more than usual 5 days Many of these issues represent the usual issues with respect to survey work in these environments
challenges / lessons learned miscellaneous • attrition of agencies and staff from CHEs has implications for training and retaining competency • cost ($$, time, human resources) vs benefit with respect to program management & planning • important to report back to communities – high importance placed on death and particularly children – opportunities for greater participation
recommendations • establish policy on when to measure mortality & why • methods need to be as simple as possible / realistic • need tools for establishing demographics in CHE (measuring & triangulating) • provide training resources together with method (competencies can be developed in-house over time)
recommendations • tactical knowledge management strategies should accompany implementation of these types of initiatives • develop guidelines for reporting back to communities & major stakeholders • develop programming guidelines for field staff (programming options)
references • World Vision Sudan. Cross-sectional study of a rural population in Southern Sudan. Nairobi: World Vision Sudan, 1998. • World Vision Sudan. Nutritional Survey, Tonj County, Bahr el Ghazal, Southern Sudan. November 1999. Nairobi: World Vision Sudan, 1999. • World Vision Sudan. Nutritional Survey, Gogrial County, Bahr el Ghazal, Southern Sudan. November 1999. Nairobi: World Vision Sudan, 1999. • Medecins Sans Frontières. Refugee Health: An approach to emergency situations. London: Macmillan Education Ltd, 1997.