1 / 21

Walking on Water

Walking on Water. Engineering Designs 100 section 12. Nikolas Collina, Anna King, Jake Maier, Cristina Youwakim Team 5: Water You Talking About.

scaron
Download Presentation

Walking on Water

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Walking on Water Engineering Designs 100 section 12 Nikolas Collina, Anna King, Jake Maier, Cristina Youwakim Team 5: Water You Talking About

  2. Our Mission is to design, test, manufacture, and market a functional device that gives an individual the ability to successfully walk on water while functioning well as a team.

  3. Table of Contents • Stakeholder Involvement • Sketches • Choosing Design and Materials • Improving Prototype • Final Thoughts

  4. The following stakeholders are interested in the success of this project. • Team Members • Dr. Colledge • Consumers • Users • Waste Management • Suppliers • Manufacturers • Investors

  5. The stakeholders want the following: (in order of importance) • Price • Quantity • Durability • Safety • Aesthetics • Can it do anything else?

  6. The final step was determining what exactly this product had to be able to do. • Maximum weight (200 lbs) • Stay afloat for the length of a pool • Stable enough to support someone’s wight • Portable • Durable • Fun for the user • Cost $100 or less (for us and consumer)

  7. We had several ideas about what our design should have looked like. Figure 3: Christina’s Idea Figure 2: Nick’s idea Figure 1: Anna’s Idea

  8. Figure 4:Final Sketch

  9. We used design matrixes to determine which idea would work best according to our specifications. Chart 1: Pairwise Matrix

  10. Chart 2: Weighted Martix

  11. Based on our criteria, there was a clear winner for our design. • Idea with score over a 3 • Ranked with a plus five on non weighted matrix

  12. For our calculations, we took several approaches in order to determine what would actually float. Chart 3: Calculations

  13. Our Bill of Materials was not very complex. Chart 4: Bill of Materials

  14. Problems With Initial Build Figure 5:Unbalanced Video 1: Testing

  15. SolidWorks Drawing Figure 6: Solidworks Drawing Figure 7: Actual Final Sketch

  16. Actual Prototype Figure 9: Prototype Figure 8: Solidworks Design

  17. Video 2: Final Testing

  18. The device needs improvement.

  19. The device still needs improvement. (summary + conclusion)

  20. The Gantt Chart… https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1KceqNvrCGQ5eAkyf2ykB1n8gmd-5m_x7USA73DLLNMs/edit#gid=0

  21. Questions?

More Related