1 / 6

Hugh Davis Learning Technologies University of Southampton, UK

FREMA : e-Learning Framework Reference Model for Assessment Assessment: Priorities and Challenges for 2006. Hugh Davis Learning Technologies University of Southampton, UK. Gap Analysis. Use Cases. Use Cases. Use Cases. Common Usage Patterns. Anatomy of a Reference Model.

sbrister
Download Presentation

Hugh Davis Learning Technologies University of Southampton, UK

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. FREMA: e-Learning Framework Reference Model for AssessmentAssessment:Priorities and Challenges for 2006 Hugh Davis Learning Technologies University of Southampton, UK

  2. Gap Analysis Use Cases Use Cases Use Cases Common Usage Patterns Anatomy of a Reference Model • Domain Definition • Overview of the domain, and how projects and standards fit within it • Identifying Common Usage Patterns • Scoping the FREMA Project • Developing Use Cases • Formal descriptions of usage patterns • Gap Analysis • Mapping of Use Cases to the Services in ELF Reference Impl’ • Service Profiles • Formal descriptions of those services Service Profiles • Reference Implementation • Of key/core services • Examples • Validation • Resource Assessment Domain Definition

  3. Issues • How do we continue CAA Centre’s work? • How can JISC promote innovative practice? • How do reference models work together? • (How) should we address different disciplinary practices? • The scope of our Reference model

  4. Challenges • Integrating manual processes and eProcesses – • including paper delivery • accessibility • personalisation

  5. Priorities • Sustainability of Teams and Technology • Reference implementation (of the assessment space) • Continue developing RQP and marking services • Promote interoperability • Kickstarting QTI v2 • Promote item banking – a reason to interoperate!

  6. Reference model work needed • Reference Implementation of the whole domain • More time to develop the domain definition and use cases • Develop the overlap with other reference models • Ensure FREMA evolves as community resource • Grow community www.frema.ecs.soton.ac.uk

More Related