1 / 1

Acknowledgments

EFFECTS OF FERTILIZER MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES ON NITRATE LEACHING AND AESTHETIC QUALITY OF ST. AUGUSTINEGRASS. Rajendra Gautam *, George Hochmuth * and Laurie Trenholm **

saul
Download Presentation

Acknowledgments

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. EFFECTS OF FERTILIZER MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES ON NITRATE LEACHING AND AESTHETIC QUALITY OF ST. AUGUSTINEGRASS. RajendraGautam*, George Hochmuth* and Laurie Trenholm** *Soil and Water Science Dept., UF; ** Environmental Horticulture, UF. • Turf color was monitored on a weekly basis by the use of NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index) turf color meter (Fig. 2 b). • Fig. 2. a) Leachate Sample collection assembly b) NDVI turf color meter • NO3-N loads (Fig. 3 and 4) of the leachate for any date were less than 0.12 kg ha-1 regardless of treatments and season. • The leaching load of NO3-N was significantly higher (0.0035 kg ha-1) in mid-April as compared to other times of the year (Fig.4). • Greater NO3-Nload was observed during early spring (slow growth rate of grass). • Higher rainfall amounts during June, July and August did not increase NO3-N leaching (faster growth rate of grass). • Fig. 3. Effects of season and treatments on NO3-N load • Fig.4. Seasonal effect on NO3-N leaching load (means with the same letter are not significantly different by LSD, P=0.05) • The NO3-N concentrations of the leachate was found to be always less than 0.3 mg/l (Fig.5) regardless of season and N rate • NO3-N concentrations with all the treatments during higher rainfall period (June, July and Aug.) were low (Fig.5) • Fig.5. Treatment effect on NO3-N concentration at different sampling dates • More than 75 % of turf in Florida is planted in urban residential venues (Hodges et al., 1994). • St Augustinegrass, is the most widely used lawngrass in Florida (Trenholm et al., 2000) and occupies about 36% of the total land under turf (Hodges et al., 1994). • Fertilization is important to maintain the health and quality of grass. • Landscape fertilization is cited by some as one of the common nonpoint sources of nitrate in groundwater (Puckett, 1995). • There is a need to develop N fertilizer management strategies that reduce nitrate leaching and maintain the health and quality of the grass. • To address this research need, this experiment was conducted at the Plant Science Research and Education Unit, Citra, Florida in 2011. • Determine a N management practice that maintains a healthy turf without significant nitrate (NO3-N) leaching loss. • Higher dose of N fertilizer (244 kg/ha) will not only result in enhanced color and aesthetics but also in greater NO3-N leaching. • Ten fertilizer treatments (Table.1.) were arranged in a randomized complete-block design with four replications. • Table.1. Treatment detail • *CRF=Controlled-Release Fertilizer • Drainage lysimeters(57 cm diameter and 80 cm deep) were installed (Fig. 1 a) with the top rim 10 cm below the surface of the soil. • Polythene tubing was connected at the bottom of the lysimeter and was conveyed to central sample collection box (Fig.2 a). • Lysimeters were filled with gravel in the bottom and then filled with the excavated soil. • ‘Floratam’St. Augustinegrass sod was planted in March 2010. • Leachate samples were collected every two weeks (Jan –Aug. , 2011) following EPA’s sample collection and handling procedure. • Leachate volume was measured for the calculation of NO3-N load • Samples were analyzed for NO3-N by Automated colorimetry, Method EPA 353.2 • Fig.1. a) Lysimeters with excavated pit b) Irrigation system • Application of 244 kg N/ha from CRF had similar effect on NO3-N load as the fertilizer dose of 195 kg N/ha as ammonium nitrate and no application of fertilizer (Fig.6). • However difference among treatments was observed (Fig.6). • The NO3-N load values with all the treatments were very low. • Fig.6. Treatment effect on NO3-N load (means with the same letter are not significantly different by LSD, P=0.05). • There were significant differences in NDVI values due to treatments. • Higher N rate resulted in greater values of NDVI (Fig. 7). • Fig. 7. Effect of fertilizer treatments on NDVI (means with the same letter are not significantly different at P=0.05) • The NO3-N leaching load (<0.02 kg ha-1) as well as the NO3-N concentration (<0.3 mg/L) of leachate were low throughout the study period. • However, NO3-N load during early spring was higher than for the summer(Fig. 4). • When the grass was growing faster (June, July and August) the load declined to near zero. • NO3-Nleaching from the high N rate (244 kg ha-1) with CRF was statistically equal to the N rate of 195 kg ha-1(ammonium nitrate) and control plots. • NO3-Nleaching was highest in the early spring and reduced in the summer • The leaching of NO3-N from St. Augustinegrass was very low (<0.15 % of fertilizer used) and hence does not have a significant role in NO3-N pollution of water bodies. • Higher values of NDVI for higher dose of fertilizer implies that the aesthetic quality of grass increased with the increase in fertilizer dose but did not increase the leaching loss. • Hodges, A.W., J.J. Haydu, P.J. van Blokland, and A.P. Bell. 1994. Contribution of the turfgrass industry to Florida's economy, 1991-92: A value-added approach. University of Florida Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences Food & Resource Economics Department Published as Economics Reoprt ER 94-1. • Trenholm, L. E., J.L. Cisar, and J.B. Unruh. 2000. St. Augustinegrass for Florida lawns. Univ. of Fl. Coop.Ext. Serv., ENH 5. Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, FL. • Puckett, L. 1995. J. Environ. Sci. Technol.29: 408-414. • Funding for this project is being provided by Agrium Advanced Technologies and University of Florida. Special thanks goes to Dawn Lucas , Basil Wetheringtonand Stephen Thomas at University of Florida. BACKGROUND LSD=0.013 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION OBJECTIVES . HYPOTHESIS LSD=0.0089 MATERIALS AND METHODS CONCLUSIONS a ab bc bc bc bc bc bc Acknowledgments c c c c c Figure 3: Average NO3-N leaching load for 13 leachate collection events ( p=0.073) REFERENCES Fig 1. Lysimeter ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

More Related