1 / 12

The U.s. grain arsenal

The U.s. grain arsenal. Food as a weapon. Political and Economic Agenda. President Hoover – used food relief to support anticommunist forces in Eastern Europe. President Carter – boycotted grain against Soviet Union after their involvement in Afghanistan.

satin
Download Presentation

The U.s. grain arsenal

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The U.s. grain arsenal Food as a weapon

  2. Political and Economic Agenda • President Hoover – used food relief to support anticommunist forces in Eastern Europe. • President Carter – boycotted grain against Soviet Union after their involvement in Afghanistan. • Post WWII – U.S. gave food aid to Italy and France to suppress lingering socialist sympathizers.

  3. Public Law 480 • Pl 480 originated in 1954 as a means to open new foreign markets for our agricultural goods. • Also provided us a tool to control the value of our agricultural commodities. We dump excess food on foreign markets. • $30 billion worth of agr. commodities in last 25 years.

  4. Types • Title 1 – Offer low interest loans to food-deficient countries so they can pay us back in the purchase of U.S. food stocks. Create dependency. • Title 2 – Charity donations of food aid to “friendly” countries for emergency and non-emergencies. Creates dependency. • Title 3 – Like title 1, but loans are eligible to be forgiven. Creates dependency.

  5. Examples • Bangladesh – since 1974, 90% of all aid has been title 1. Although their government subsidizes the price, more than 90% of the food goes to the middle class. Advantages the more wealthy and disadvantages the poor. • South Korea – in 1975, $6 billion of the proceeds from the sale of title 1 credit went to their military budget.

  6. Cooley Program • Established in 1971, it further advantaged U.S. farmers and agricultural corporations by giving funds in local currencies instead of U.S. dollars. • This prevents the depreciation of the dollar.

  7. Food Colonialism • In many cases, title 1 credit has only been awarded after formal agreements to increase purchases from the U.S. • Have assisted countries in transitioning into wheat and grain dependency and developing businesses that require U.S. imports such as local livestock. • EAT AMERICAN! • Dependency on U.S. imports has strategically been implemented to increase our global political leverage.

  8. Chile • 1970 – Socialist government under president Salvador Allende took power. • White house, CIA, and TNCs, collectively suspended all title 1 credits to Chile under their common political and economic agenda. • Food security at risk due to dependency on food aid loans. • U.S. also denied the sale of food of cash.

  9. Chile Continued. • 1973 – The socialist Allende government was successfully overthrown by a local military coup supported by the United States. • U.S. supported the new government with $52 million in title 1 credits. • This made up 84% of all loans to S. America. • U.S. supported a military dictatorship to strengthen its own political and economic power.

  10. Chile Aftermath • Chile became the world’s 9th largest purchaser of U.S. arms. • 30% unemployment. • Inflation up 600%. • Infant morality up 18%. • 80% of an average citizen’s income went towards food. • Average caloric deficiency of 40%.

  11. Changes in PL 480 • 1975 – Congress stated that ¾ of title 1 credits must be given to “poor” countries. (countries with per capital GNP of $300 or less) • 83% of non-food aid given out to countries above “poor” line • Poverty line was changed to $520 so the U.S. could continue to lend to ally countries and new countries with economic potential in industries such as oil.

  12. Conclusion • The United States has and is continuing to use food as a means to gain global political and economical leverage. • Humanitarianism and peace have been used to cover up and justify this selfish agenda. • Our history of international food aid demonstrates this with the many instances in which the U.S. has disregarded democratic and poor populations in favor dictatorships and militaristic goverments.

More Related