1 / 26

Converting Pension Problem into Solution: Cap Weighting vs Fundamental Indexing

This article explores the use of cap weighting and fundamental indexing as potential solutions to the pension problem. It highlights the drawbacks of cap weighting and presents fundamental indexing as a more efficient alternative. The growth and success of fundamental indexing in the US and Europe are also discussed.

Download Presentation

Converting Pension Problem into Solution: Cap Weighting vs Fundamental Indexing

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Does Cap-Weighting “Weigh us Down"?Converting part of the Pension Problem into part of the Pension Solution Robert D. Arnott / arnott@rallc.com Pensions & Investments December, 2006

  2. Equities: Part of the Problem,or Part of the Solution • Liabilities have the Character of Long Strips and TIPS • Equities don’t. They create risk unrelated to the liabilities and take assets out of the markets that match liabilities. • Long Strips and TIPS produce a yield of 4-6% • Equities are used to reach for added returns. But, what if the risk premium is smaller than in the past. • Stocks are currently part of the pension problem • Stocks become an important part of the solution, if … • The return is far higher than bonds, and • The mismatch with liabilities is diminished.

  3. Our Biggest Bets are in Equities – Can We Improve our Indexes?!

  4. Problems with Cap Indexes • Introduces substantial growth bias • Fully participates in every market bubble • Fully participates in every market decline • Stocks selected by a committee (S&P, MSCI) • Or by formulas which are closely-guarded secrets • Most turnover is in the smallest names But the most important problem— • Over weights all over priced stocks • Under weights all under priced stocks

  5. The Return Drag of Cap-Weighting • The Efficient Markets Hypothesis • Price identically equals true fair value for all assets at all times • Hardly anyone believes this • If price equals true fair value plus or minus an error … • Overvalued will have higher market capitalization and higher valuation multiples than they should • This creates the size and value effects • How likely is it that the top ten in market cap and the top ten in true fair value will be the same stocks? • Some of the top market cap get there through pricing error • None get there as a consequence of being undervalued!

  6. Stocks at the Top Tend to Underperform Here’s where 20-25% of the index is invested … Source: Research Affiliates, LLC

  7. Can We Improve on Cap-Weighting?

  8. Alternative Measures of Size • Main Street uses Fundamentals: • Income or Cash Flow • Sales or Revenues • Book Equity Value (Shareholders Equity) • Gross Dividends Paid • Creating an Index based on “Fundamentals” • An equity Index of 1000 stocks • Companies selected by fundamentals • Companies ranked by fundamentals • Companies weighted by fundamentals • This a Valuation-indifferent Index • Strips away linkage between portfolio weight and any over- or under-valuation

  9. Comparison of Indexes

  10. Twenty Largest Holdings on 12 / 31 / 2005

  11. Sector Weights Over Time,Capitalization Weighting

  12. Sector Weights Over Time,Fundamental (Composite) Weighting

  13. How Well Does the Fundamental Indexing Concept Work Outside of the US?(Japan Analysis Courtesy of Nomura Research Institute)

  14. Fundamental Index™ Japan1983-2005 Cumulative Performance

  15. RAFI™ Alpha Comes From Sector Bets and Stock Selections!

  16. RAFI™ Sectors vs. S&P Sectors (1/3)

  17. RAFI™ Sectors vs. S&P Sectors (2/3)

  18. RAFI™ Sectors vs. S&P Sectors (3/3)

  19. Where Do We Go From Here?

  20. Fundamental Index™ Emerging Markets1987-2005 Cumulative Performance

  21. Uses for a Fundamentals Index • Can serve as a broad market portfolio that replaces both value indexes and cap-weighted core indexes • Can replace active managers not likely to deliver 2.0% in net of fees value added • Can be a benchmark for active managers, freeing them from pressure to track an inferior cap-weighted index • Can provide a basis for a quantitative long/short portfolio • Can be a basis for a more efficient full market portfolio of international and/or global stocks

  22. How is RAFI Growing in the US and Europe? • Current size is over $5 billion • Up six-fold from $800m at the start of the year. • FTSE has 12 licensees offering RAFI-based product • PIMCO adopted RAFI for enhanced indexing in 6/05 • Currently $600m assets • PowerShares launched ETF based on passive RAFI in 12/05 • Already over $800m assets, 3% value added with 99% correlation • Nomura has launched Kokusai and Japan portfolios in 11/05 & 2/06 • Over $300m assets; strong value added in both, in a bull market • CalPERS invested over $1B in 6/06; 1% added in 4 months • Expecting to launch EAFE portfolio this month • First European client was Nobel Foundation in 2/06 • Over 3% added in first eight months • Swedish National Pension (AP2) has over $1B invested • Handelsbanken launched first Pan-Europe ETF in 10/06 • Lyxor (largest European-Based ETF provider) plans Dec launch • Several other jumbo players, who prefer to remain anonymous, are planning large allocations before yearend.

  23. What About the Asset/LiabilityMismatch?

  24. Which Risk Do You Want To Control?

  25. Fundamental Indexes™ andAsset/Liability Mismatch

  26. Are We Blinded by Theory? • Theory does a Marvelous Job explaining how the world ought to work • Theories are sometimes provable, based on certain assumptions • Gaps between theory and reality are normal • Still, some observers cling to theory as fact • Assume a theory is correct description of reality • Assume that, therefore, the assumptions are correct • This is exactly backwards!

More Related