1 / 17

Surface scattering

Surface scattering. Chris Allen (callen@eecs.ku.edu) Course website URL people.eecs.ku.edu/~callen/823/EECS823.htm. Outline. Factors affecting scattering Simple  models More complex  models Where to find more information. Factors affecting surface scattering.

Download Presentation

Surface scattering

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Surface scattering • Chris Allen (callen@eecs.ku.edu) • Course website URL people.eecs.ku.edu/~callen/823/EECS823.htm

  2. Outline • Factors affecting scattering • Simple  models • More complex  models • Where to find more information

  3. Factors affecting surface scattering • The scattering characteristics of a surface are represented by the scattering coefficient,  • For surface scattering, several factors affect  • Dielectric contrast Large contrast at boundary produces large reflection coefficient Air (r = 1), Ice (r ~ 3.2), (Rock (4  r 9), Soil (3  r 10), Vegetation (2  r 15), Water (~ 80), Metal (  ) • Surface roughness (measured relative to ) RMS height and correlation length used to characterize roughness • Incidence angle, () • Surface slope Skews the () relationship • Polarization VV  HH» HV  VH

  4. Factors affecting surface scattering • Surface roughness (measured relative to ) • RMS height and correlation length used to characterize roughness •  is the surface height standard deviation • ℓ is the surface correlation length

  5. Surface roughness and scattering • Rayleigh criteria for “smoothness” • Phase difference between two reflected rays < /2 • Which leads to the following constraint on RMS height • Frauenhofer criteria for “smoothness” • Phase difference between two reflected rays < /8 • Which leads to the following constraint on RMS height

  6. Surface roughness and scattering • The Rayleigh criterion states that if the phase difference  (due to propagation) between two reflected rays shown (see Fig. 2.1) is less than /2 radians, then the surface may be considered smooth. • From the geometry we know (eqn 1) • which, if set < /2, leads to the Rayleigh criterion for a surface to be • considered smooth, that is (eqn 2) • Derive the Rayleighcriterion from the information provided. • Show all of the stepsleading to eqns (1) and (2)

  7. Surface roughness and backscatter • Backscatter is the special case where o = s, o = s

  8. Backscatter from bare soil • Note: At 1.1 GHz,  = 27.3 cm

  9. Simple  models • For purposes of radar system design, simple models for the backscattering characteristics from terrain can be used. • A variety of models have been developed. • Below are some of the more simple models that may be useful. • () = (0) cosn() • where  is the incidence angle and n is a roughness-dependent variable. • n = 0 for a very rough (Lambertian) surface [() = (0)] • n = 1 for a moderately rough surface [() = (0) cos()] • n = 2 for a moderately smooth surface [() = (0) cos2 ()] • or • () = (0) e – / o • where  is the incidence angle and o is a roughness-dependent angle. • In both model types (0) depends on the target characteristics

  10. More complex  models • Less simple backscattering models • A is the illuminated area • k is the wavenumber, k = 2/ • ℓ is the surface correlation length • r is the permittivity of medium 2 relative to medium 1 • r is the permeability of medium 2 relative to medium 1 • (0) is the 2nd derivative of correlation coefficient at the origin •  is the incidence angle •  is the surface height standard deviation • 2|(0)| is the mean-squared surface slope • Backscattering assumed throughout, unless specified otherwiseo = s, o = s • r = 1 also assumed

  11. More complex  models • Small-perturbation model – or – Incoherent scattering from a slightly rough surface • constraints: • rough surface-height standard deviation << incident wavelengthk < 0.3 or  < 0.048  • average surface slope  the standard deviation times the wavenumberrms slope< 0.3 or  < 0.21ℓ

  12. More complex  models • Small-perturbation model – or – Incoherent scattering from a slightly rough surface

  13. More complex  models • Coherent reflection coefficients for rough planar surface • Incoherent scattering from a very rough planar surface • constraints: • radius of curvature >>  , isotropic roughness, ℓ << A • shadowing and multiple scattering ignored • where s = 4 2 / ℓ2

  14. More complex  models • Incoherent scattering from a very rough planar surface

  15. More complex  models • Incoherent Kirchhoff surface scattering– or –Geometric optics model • constraints: • ℓ > 1.6  • ℓ2 > 2.76   •  > 0.25  • shadowing and multiple scattering ignored • where p and q represent the transmit and receive polarizations, hence pp represents co-polarized backscattering (hh or vv) andpq represents cross-polarized backscattering (vh or hv)

  16. More complex  models • Incoherent Kirchhoff surface scattering– or –Geometric optics model • 2|(0)| is the mean-squared surface slope • – or – • 2|(0)| = m2

  17. Where to find more information • Ulaby FT; Moore RK; Fung AK; Microwave Remote Sensing, Vol. 2, Artech House, 1982 • Fung AK; "Review of random surface scatter models," Proc. SPIE, vol. 358, Applications of Mathematics in Modern Optics, pp. 87-98 1982 • Davies H; "The reflection of electromagnetic waves from a rough surface," Proc. IEE, 101(part IV), pp. 209-214, 1954 • Ruck GT; Barrick DE; Stuart WD; Kirchbaum CK; Radar Cross Section, Vol. 2, 1970

More Related