tall buildings l.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Tall Buildings PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Tall Buildings

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 31

Tall Buildings - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 490 Views
  • Uploaded on

Tall Buildings. Performance-based guidelines and regulations. Joe Maffei Rutherford & Chekene. Jack Moehle UC Berkeley. Outline. Today’s tall buildings Applicability of PBEE to tall buildings PBEE practice needs PEER Tall Building Initiative. Buildings over 240 ft

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Tall Buildings' - sandra_john


Download Now An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
tall buildings

Tall Buildings

Performance-based guidelines and regulations

Joe Maffei

Rutherford & Chekene

Jack Moehle

UC Berkeley

outline
Outline
  • Today’s tall buildings
  • Applicability of PBEE to tall buildings
  • PBEE practice needs
  • PEER Tall Building Initiative
slide3

Buildings over 240 ft

(proposed, approved, or under construction)

San Francisco – 38; Los Angeles – 53; Seattle …

types of occupancy

CONDO

HOTEL

$

RETAIL

PARKING

Types of Occupancy

$

what s different about these buildings
What’s different about these buildings?
  • High-performance materials
  • Framing systems not satisfying code prescriptive limits
  • Non-prescriptive designs are accepted in the code by demonstrating at least equivalent seismic performance.UBC 1629.10.1, 1605.2, 104.2.8

after MKA

what is equivalent performance
What is “Equivalent” Performance?
  • Consider both the intended performance of the code and the performance of a typical good prescriptive design.
  • Equivalence to poorly-performing but code-prescriptive buildings should not be acceptable.
  • Use Seismic Peer Review.
two stage design
Two-Stage Design
  • Determine the strengths at nonlinear locations using the building code requirements
    • Code (DBE) level earthquake R factor
    • Minimum base shear
  • All other actions are designed to remain elastic under MCE level ground motions:
    • Wall shear, shear friction, wall flexure outside of intended yield locations, floor and roof diaphragms and collectors and connections, foundation perimeter walls, etc.
slide16

Example PBEE Practice Needs

Acceptability of yielding outside base hinge zone.

linear and nonlinear modeling assumptions
Linear and nonlinear modeling assumptions

Elastic ETABS Model

UCSD Wall

RUTHERFORD & CHEKENE

slide20

Wall: Eeff = 0.2Ec

Slab: Eeff = 0.1Ec

RUTHERFORD & CHEKENE

pbee practice needs
PBEE Practice Needs
  • Applicable ground motions
    • (e.g., T = 9 sec)
  • Ground motion scaling
  • Input motions for subterranean levels
  • Performance objectives

Structural Design (Joe’s top 15)

  • Minimum base shear
  • Capacity design factors
  • Inherent slab-outrigger effect
  • Story mechanism protection
  • Wall shear strength
  • Effective damping in NLRH analysis
  • Other NLRH assumptions
  • Effective elastic stiffness
  • Podium force transfer
  • Rational drift limits
  • P-delta modeling
  • Concrete slab to core wall connections
  • Steel framing to core wall connections
  • Deep mat slab behavior
  • Dual system requirements
tall buildings initiative
Tall Buildings Initiative
  • 24 month initiative to advance design of tall buildings
  • Main participants
    • PEER, SCEC, USGS, SFDBI, LADBS, FEMA
    • ATC, LATBSDC, SEAOC, SEAONC
    • Project Management Committee (T-PAC)
      • J. Moehle, Y. Bozorgnia
      • N. Abrahamson, M. Lew, P. Somerville
      • R. Hamburger, H. Krawinkler, M. Moore, F. Naeim
      • R. Lui
    • Kickoff meeting – 11 August 2006
scope
Scope
  • Tall buildings
  • Seismic design of structural system
  • Coastal California
  • Concrete and steel
  • Residential focus, but not excluding other occupancies
tasks
Tasks
  • Establish and operate Project Advisory Committee (T-PAC)
  • Research tasks
    • Consensus performance objectives
    • Assessment of ground motion selection and scaling procedures
    • Synthetically generated ground motions
    • Review of synthetically generated ground motions
    • Guidelines on ground motion selection and modification
    • Guidelines on modeling and acceptance criteria
    • Input ground motions for tall buildings with subterranean levels
    • Other tasks to be defined….
    • Guidelines for seismic design of tall buildings
  • Workshops, presentations, etc.
  • Final report to sponsoring organizations
performance objectives

What do you think of this performance scenario?

Rare earthquake scenario damage,

(one in ten chance of occurring during the 50-yr life of condominium towers)

Performance Objectives
  • Core group: W. Holmes, C. Kircher, L. Kornfield, B. Petak, N. Yousef
  • Approach: Obtain input from stakeholders, formulate strawman performance objective, workshop, …
selection and scaling of ground motion

Story level

Story Moment

Selection and scaling of ground motion
  • Core group: J. Moehle, S. Mahin, J. Hooper, T. Yang, C. McQuiod
  • Approach: Select ground motion bins, analyze building models to develop response statistics, and test various ground motion selection and scaling methods against the “true” result.
ground motion simulation review and selection and scaling guidelines
Ground motion simulation, review, and selection and scaling guidelines
  • Core group:P. Somerville, B. Aagaard, N. Collins, R. Graves
  • Approach: Develop waveforms for large-magnitudes, small distances in SF and LA, constrained by PSHA
  • Core group:P. Somerville, B. Aagaard, N. Collins, R. Graves
  • Approach: Develop waveforms for large-magnitudes, small distances in SF and LA, constrained by PSHA
  • Review:F. Naeim, Y. Bozorgnia, N. Abrahamson, B. Chiou, CB Crouse, D. Dreger, Y. Moriwaki, Y. Zeng
  • Guidelines: Y. Bozorgnia, N. Luco, F. Naeim, J. Hooper, N. Abrahamson, J. Maffei
guidelines for modeling and acceptance criteria
Guidelines for Modeling and Acceptance Criteria
  • Core group – J. Malley, G. Deierlein, H. Krawinkler, J. Maffei, M. Pourzanjani and J. Wallace
  • Approach: Workshop to identify key issues, assignments to experts to develop principles, procedures, and values.
  • Key issues:
    • Basic principles, including capacity design
    • General modeling issues (e.g., effective damping)
    • Podium force transfer
    • Modeling of various systems and elements (core walls, frames, coupling beams, etc.)
    • Foundation modeling (with Task 8)
input ground motions for tall buildings with subterranean levels

qf

ug

uf

Input ground motions for tall buildings with subterranean levels
  • Core Group: J. Stewart, C.B. Crouse, M. Lew, A. Mikami, F. Ostadan, E. Taciroglu
  • Approach: Report on the state of practice and “art,” and recommend future studies.
  • Key issues:
    • Quantifying ground motions in basements relative to free-field
      • Reductions of horizontal motions
      • Introduction of rotation
    • Are these effects significant at the EDP level (and beyond)?
    • Importance of flexibility of embedded sub-structure
final product
Final product

Guidelines for performance-based seismic design of

tall buildings

December 2008

pbee practice needs31

ROOF

Roof drift, ft

Wall base shear, k

Wall moment at 13th floor, 1000 x k-ft

Minimum

Maximum

Mean (m)

m + s

c.o.v.

Nonlinear

static

2.1

6.7

4.2

5.4

0.23

7600

29700

15500

22200

0.43

5500

513

1080

900

1090

0.21

760

13th

BASE

PBEE practice needs

(a) Building elevation

(b) Summary of results