1 / 32

Collider Constraints On Low Mass WIMP

Collider Constraints On Low Mass WIMP. Haipeng An, University of Maryland Shanghai Jiao Tong University In collaboration with Xiangdong Ji, Lian-Tao Wang. 中国科学院理论物理研究所冬季研讨会 -- 暗物质与重子物质起源 2010.12.13-15. Outlines. Experiments;

sancha
Download Presentation

Collider Constraints On Low Mass WIMP

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Collider Constraints On Low Mass WIMP Haipeng An, University of Maryland Shanghai Jiao Tong University In collaboration with Xiangdong Ji, Lian-Tao Wang 中国科学院理论物理研究所冬季研讨会 -- 暗物质与重子物质起源2010.12.13-15

  2. Outlines • Experiments; • Possible Interactions Between WIMP and SM particles; • Tevatron Constraints on the parameter space; • Tevatron Constraints on direct detection cross section; • Relic abundance; • Flavor changing neutral currents.

  3. Direct Detection Experiments • CoGeNT Observed excess could be explained by WIMP signal with mass in the range of 6~11 GeV. Cross section 10-41~10-40 cm2. • CRESST-II CaWO4 32 events cannot be explained by known background. Can be explained by WIMP with mass around smaller than 15 GeV. And the cross section is about a few times 10-41 cm2 . • XENON100 Poisson smearing, null-result. New XENON100 result with a detecting power ten times larger will be published soon.

  4. 15 GeV 5 GeV Direct Detection Experiments

  5. Relic abundance • Thermal freezing-out • Thermal freezing-in (Multi-components) • SuperWIMP • Asymmetric dark matter • ... ... • Using relic abundance as a lower bound

  6. Study the properties of large extra dimension models Tevatron Constraints • Leading jet ET > 80 GeV; • pT of second jet < 30 GeV; • Vetoing any third jet with ET > 20 GeV; • Missing ET > 80 GeV. • 1 fb-1 of data from Tevatron, 8449 events observed. • SM background 8663±332; • Hard process is good enough. Goodman, Ibe, Rajaraman, Shepherd, Tait, Yu (1005.1286, 1008.1783); Bai, Fox, Harnik (1005.3797). Aaltonen et al. [CDF Collaboration], PRL 101, 181602, 2008.

  7. Contact Operator • In the work by Irvine group, effective four particle interaction is used to study the Tevatron constraint and LHC prediction. • However, in Tevatron the center-of-mass energy of the proton-anti-proton pair is 1.96 TeV, therefore if the mass of the intermediate particle is around a few hundred GeV, the interaction cannot be considered as a contact interaction. • Furthermore, if the result of CoGeNT is induced by elastic SI, MI collision between dark matter and nuclei, the effective coupling can be written as

  8. Z-boson mediator • MDM << MZ. • Coupling between MZ and DM should be smaller than 0.02. • Relic abundance is too large.

  9. Standard Model Higgs • If dark matter is a fermion, since the Yukawa couplings to light quarks are small. The relic abundance is too large. • However, if dark matter is a scalar, the relic abundance constraint can be avoided. (Xiao-gang’s talk)

  10. Possible Interactions • SM Higgs + Scalar dark matter is still possible. • Dark matter: Complex Scalar (Φ), Dirac Fermion (χ). • Mediator: Scalar (H’), Vector (Z’). • T-channel annihilation, colored particle. (Will be study elsewhere). • More complicated cases …

  11. gD=0.5, 1, 2, 3, 5 MZ’ = 5 GeV M* Vector Mediator with Fermion WIMP

  12. gD=0.5, 1, 2, 3, 5 430 GeV 450 GeV 480 GeV 500 GeV Tevatron constraint Cannot saturate Tevatron bound in perturbative region Contact operator case Vector Mediator with Fermion WIMP

  13. 15 GeV 5 GeV Vector mediator Scalar dark matter Scalar mediator fermion dark matter Vector mediator fermion dark matter Vector Mediator with Fermion WIMP

  14. Dipole Interaction • Perturbatively • Non-perturbatively

  15. Dipole Interaction

  16. Quark EDM (QCD sum rules) Pospelov, Ritz PRD 63, 073015 Direct detection cross section • Hadronic matrix elements • Electric Dipole coupling Belanger, Boudjema, Pukhov, Semenov “MicrOMEGAs2.2” (0803.2360). Fan, Reece, Wang (1008.1591).

  17. Direct detection cross section • Power counting SI: Spin-independent ~ O(1) SD: Spin-dependent ~ O(10-3~10-4) MI: Momentum-indenpent ~ O(1) MD: Momentum-dependent ~ O(10-6)

  18. Magnetic Interaction

  19. Tevatron Constraints on Direct Detection Cross Section MZ’ < M* constraint on gZ’ does not depend on gD. σ ∝ gD- 2 gD=1 gD=0.5

  20. Tevatron Constraints on Direct Detection Cross Section MDM=5 GeV MDM=15 GeV

  21. Relic Abundance • Ωh2 ≈ 0.1pb / σ. • We choose gD=1 as a benchmark scenario to study the relic abundance. • During the thermal annihilation MDM/T ≈ 20, during this era, dark matter particles are non-relativistic. • For some operators the annihilation cross section are suppressed by v2. JPC Group state of spin-1/2 fermion anti-fermion pair can only be 0-+ and 1--

  22. 5 GeV, 7 GeV, 10 GeV, 12 GeV, 15 GeV Tevatron Constraints on Relic Abundance (MZ’>80 GeV)

  23. Factor of 10 Tevatron Constraints on Relic Abundance (MZ’>80 GeV) σ ∝ MDM2 NR suppression

  24. Factor of 102 Dipole coupling (MZ’>80 GeV) σ ∝ MDM4

  25. Scalar Mediator with Fermion DM

  26. Vector Mediator and Scalar DM

  27. Scalar Mediator with Scalar Dark Matter (MZ’>80 GeV)

  28. Different Energy Scales • Collider: In the case of Mmediator < M*, the mediator is produced on-shell and then decay to DM-anti-DM pair, the energy flowing into the DM anti-DM pair is just Mmediator. • Thermal annihilation: The energy flowing into Z’ is 2MDM. Therefore, if the coupling is dimensional -1, like the dipole interaction case, the collider constraint on the thermal annihilation cross section is enhanced by a factor of (MDM/MZ’)2. Whereas, if the coupling is dimension 1, like the scalar mediator with scalar dark matter case, the constraint on thermal annihilation cross section is weakened by a factor of (MDM/MH’)2.

  29. LEP II constraints on Z’ coupling to leptons • If the MZ’ > 209 GeV, in the case of B-xL model, the constraint on x is that MZ’/gZ’ > 6.2x TeV. • If MZ’ < 209 GeV, the coupling between Z’ and leptons should be smaller than 10-2. • In the case of gD=1, MZ’=80 GeV, MD=15 GeV, ge=gmu=gtau=0.01, the relic abundance is Ωh2 = 0.58, which is about 5 times larger than the observed one. Since Ωh2 ~ 0.1pb / σ, the contribution of the annihilation cross section from hadronic sector needs to be at least 5 time larger than from the lepton sector. • If gD gets larger, the constraint from thermal relic abundance is weakened.

  30. Possible Interactions at gD=1, Mmediator>80 GeV • Other interactions are either suppressed by velocity or suppressed by MD / MZ’. • Except for the case of scalar mediator and scalar DM, the allowed cases are also stringently constrained.

  31. Flavor Changing Neutral Current • Quark rotation matrices can induce tree-level FCNC. In the case of new scalar mediator. • If the vector mediator is non-universally coupled to quarks, it also suffers from tree-level FCNC constraints.

  32. Summary • We consider elastic, single component, dark matter, specifically, complex scalar and Dirac fermion. The mediator we can considered are vector and real scalar. • In our study, the interaction is conducting by a propagating particle instead of a contact operator. • Collider constraints on the direct detection and relic abundance is studied especially for heavy mediator cases (M>80 GeV, gD=1).

More Related