deemed energy savings and cost effectiveness of 80 plus power supplies n.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Deemed Energy Savings and Cost-Effectiveness of 80-Plus Power Supplies PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Deemed Energy Savings and Cost-Effectiveness of 80-Plus Power Supplies

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 13

Deemed Energy Savings and Cost-Effectiveness of 80-Plus Power Supplies - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 80 Views
  • Updated on

Deemed Energy Savings and Cost-Effectiveness of 80-Plus Power Supplies. RTF January 2007. From Linear to Switching Power Supplies. Published Estimates. Ecos (August 2005) 82 kWh per unit residential 90 kWh per unit commercial 85 kWh weighted average NEEA (March 2005)

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

Deemed Energy Savings and Cost-Effectiveness of 80-Plus Power Supplies


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    Presentation Transcript
    1. Deemed Energy Savings and Cost-Effectiveness of 80-Plus Power Supplies RTF January 2007

    2. From Linear to Switching Power Supplies

    3. Published Estimates • Ecos (August 2005) • 82 kWh per unit residential • 90 kWh per unit commercial • 85 kWh weighted average • NEEA (March 2005) • 76 kWh per unit residential • 88 kWh per unit commercial • 74 kWh per unit commercial with network off • 82 kWh per unit weighted average net of network off

    4. Key Factors for Binned Savings Estimates • Hours in each power consumption bin • Developed by Intel & Ecos • Set to fit total consumption • Total consumption based on several sources • Roth 2002, LBL for Energy Star, Ecos • Efficiency by power consumption bin • Base case: Intel 2005 required efficiency • 80-Plus: Bench tests conducted by EPRI-PEAC • Time in standby mode • LBL “After Hours” report

    5. Changes Since Estimates • Higher computer power requirements • Increase savings • Improving efficiency of non 80-Plus power supplies • Decrease savings • Identified added savings from power factor correction • Add ~25 kWh • Penetration of network off-hours control • Unknown

    6. Savings from Power Factor Correction

    7. Cost Estimates • Incremental cost of $5/unit • Declining to $2.50 by 2010 • NEEA program costs estimates ~ $40 per unit • Lifetime: 4 years • No O&M costs • NEEA B/C ratio: Over 5.0 for venture plus market effects

    8. Issues • Update NEEA assumptions? • Include indirect savings from power factor? • Adopt Ecos estimate for servers? • Estimate HVAC interactions?

    9. Options

    10. Recommendations • Stick with NEEA estimate for now • Ignore savings from power factor correction until Ecos adopts them • Ignore HVAC interaction • Review Ecos server application savings when programs are deployed for servers