1 / 21

Lab 5: Realistic Integration

Lab 5: Realistic Integration. CS 282. Questions?. Any question about… SVN Permissions? General Usage? Doxygen Remember that Project 1 will require it However, Assignment 2 is good practice place Assignment 2 Is posted on the class website. The Plan. Go over methods of integration

samson
Download Presentation

Lab 5: Realistic Integration

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Lab 5: Realistic Integration CS 282

  2. Questions? • Any question about… • SVN • Permissions? • General Usage? • Doxygen • Remember that Project 1 will require it • However, Assignment 2 is good practice place • Assignment 2 • Is posted on the class website

  3. The Plan • Go over methods of integration • Euler’s method • Analytical • Approximation • Examine the boat problem • Program Runge-Kutta • Compare against analytical and euler methods • Plot position vs. time (due next week’s lab)

  4. Integration • We use integration to move our system forward in time given a force/control • If you remember the falling ball lab, we used an Euler method (kind of like cheating) to integrate • velocity = old_velocity + delta_time * acceleration • position = old_position + delta_time * velocity • There exists better methods, however, for integration.

  5. Analytical vs. Numerical • Let’s say we are trying to solve the equation x – 5 = 0 • Analytical methods solve for the exact answer • In this case it’s easy to come up the analytical answer x = 5 • Let’s assume we weren’t so smart. Then we could develop an algorithm to numerically solve this problem on a computer • The algorithm could have the computer “guess” the answer by testing different values of x. We could specify our “error tolerance” to speed this process up.

  6. The Boat Problem Forces on the boat: B = Buoyancy T = Thrust W = Weight R = Resistance If B = W, we can ignore the movement in y

  7. Euler Solution • new_velocity = old_velocity + acceleration * dt • new_position = old_position + new_velocity * dt • Pros: • Easy to compute • Easy to understand • This means it’s also easy to program • Cons: • Highly erroneous • Not stable (i.e. tends to not converge to the true solution)

  8. Exercise: Euler’s Method • Open up this week’s framework • Examine rigid_body.cpp • Notice that it is conveniently modeled like a boat • Take a look at the function “euler_update_state” • Make sure you understand each line in this function • This function is the Euler method of updating the boat’s state • Compile the code • Run the executable • Now let’s examine the analytical solution

  9. Analytical Solution • Here we see the equations for the velocity, distance traveled, and acceleration of the boat • Pro • The one, true solution • Cons: • Often hard to derive • For complex systems, infeasible to implement

  10. Numerical Method • Why not take advantage of the fact that we’re computer scientists? • Pros • More realistic compared to Euler’s method • Utilizes computational power • We do not have to analytically solve (which for some systems is infeasible) • Con • Not as accurate since its an approximation • Power depends on skill of programmer and the computational capacity of the computer

  11. What’s Runge-Kutta? • The numerical method we will be using today is called “Runge-Kutta” • Essentially, Runge-Kutta uses Euler’s Method and splits up the integration into four parts. It then takes the average of these parts, and computes the new integration. • The reason this works better is because after each split, it uses a newly computed control to re-integrate.

  12. Overview of Runge-Kutta • First, we compute k1 using Euler’s method of integration. • After this, we integrate while adding half of k1 to our velocity (or state). This allows us to solve for k2. • Next we integrate while adding half of k2, and solve for k3. • Finally, we integrate by completely adding k3 and solve for k4. • After averaging together all kx, we now have a new velocity (or state).

  13. 4th-orderRunge-Kutta Method k2 k4 k3 k1 xi xi + h/2 xi + h Credit to: Dr. E.W. SandtCivil Engineering DepartmentTexas A&M University

  14. Runge-Kutta Method (4th Order) Example Consider Exact Solution The initial condition is: The step size is: Credit to: Dr. E.W. SandtCivil Engineering DepartmentTexas A&M University

  15. The 4th order Runge-Kutta The example of a single step: Credit to: Dr. E.W. SandtCivil Engineering DepartmentTexas A&M University

  16. Exercise: Implement Runge-Kutta • The goal for today is to implement Runge-Kutta for simulating the movement of a boat. • And if you finish early, to start working on the graph due next week. • At the beginning of next week’s lab, you must turn in a graph comparing the position of the boat over time using • the Euler Method (already implemented) • the Analytical Method (plug into the equations) • Runge-Kutta

  17. Exercise: Implement Runge-Kutta • Let’s do the first step of Runge-Kutta • Follow the Euler method and compute k1 • This will involve you computing the Force and Acceleration • This gives us k1 = delta_time * acceleration • Now that we have k1, we can use this to compute the halves (k2 and k3)

  18. Exercise: Implement Runge-Kutta • Step two starts off nearly the same • However, when computing force, be sure to add half of k1 to your velocity • F = thrust - (drag * (velocity + k1 /2) ) • Solve for acceleration • Compute k2 like before • Step three is exactly the same as step two, except use k2 now.

  19. Exercise: Implement Runge-Kutta • Step four (surprise!) is exactly the same • Except, since we are integrating over the entire period, we do not halve our duration • Solve for k4 now • We need to average together our kx’s • k2 and k3account for double because we integrated only half of them. • So, we have 6 parts in total to average. • Finally, add the average to your velocity, and compute position like normal.

  20. Exercise: Implement Runge-Kutta • Go to lab5.cpp, and look in the DrawGLScene • Comment out the euler method, and add the appropriate call to the runge-kutta method • Examine Runge-Kutta running • It will be hard to visually notice a difference. Instead, run the Euler method for a short period, and compare the numbers.

  21. Comparison • For next week, you will be turning in a graph comparing the three methods. • Euler Method (already implemented), Analytical Method (plug into the equations), Runge-Kutta • Output the position at each time step to a file • Copy those numbers into excel (or the software of your choice) and plot a graph over time comparing the positions for each method. • For the analytical method, you can • a) Program the equations and run it • or b) Plug in time, solve them, and put the numbers into the graph

More Related