140 likes | 233 Views
Explore how gender influences walking preferences, with a focus on group behavior, communication styles, and safety concerns among college students.
E N D
Gender Differences in Walking Preferences Jenny Braun, Sarah J. Hickman, Jeremy Owens Hanover College 2005
Introduction • Women’s bathroom • Groups of women walking to class • Do women travel in groups more often than men travel in groups?
Research • People in Groups • People need interactions with others to feel a sense of belonging (Baumeister & Leary, 1995) • When in a group people feel less anxious and self-aware (Carron, Estabrooks, Prapavessis, & Hausenblas, 1999)
Research (cont.) • Gender Differences in Groups • Women prefer closer proximity to each other than men (Barnard & Bell, 1984) • Females value communication with emotional support (Burelson, 2003 ) • Males value communication that maintains independence (Burelson, 2003 )
Hypothesis • Women are more likely to walk in groups than men are
Methods • Subjects were observed while they were walking to and from class • On a small, Midwestern college campus • Observer recorded the gender of every person and whether or not the person was traveling alone or in a group
Results • 961 observations were collected • 60% of the total observations were female • 36% of females walked in a group • 30% of males walked in a group
Percent Walking in Group Chi Square(1) = 3.60, p = .058
Same Gender Walking in Group Chi Square(1) = 4.08, p = .043
Discussion • Safety Concerns • Women may feel uncomfortable walking alone • Women alone are at greater risk than men for robbery and sexual assault • Men may feel more comfortable walking alone
Discussion • Gender Roles • Male: agentic • Female: communal • Williams & Best, 198
Future Research • Gather research via video camera • Gather more varied results • Observe in different locations • Urban vs. Rural • College-aged vs. Different Age Groups
References Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachment as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497-529. Berdahl, J. L. & Anderson, Cameron. (2005). Men, women, and leadership centralization in groups over time. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 9(1), 45-57. Burleson, B. R. (2003). The experience and effects of emotional support: What the Study of cultural and gender differences can tell us about close relationships, emotion and interpersonal communication. Personal Relationships, 10(1), 1-23. Carron, A. V., Estabrooks, P. A., Prapavessis, H., & Hausenblas, H.A. (1999). Reductions in the social anxiety of women associated with group membership: Distraction, anonymity, security, or diffusion of evaluation? Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 3(2), 152-160. Hjorthol, R. (2001). Gendered aspects of time related to everyday journeys. Acta Sociologica, 44(1), 37-49. Leary, M. R., Nezlek, J. B., Downs, D., Radford-Davenport, J., Martin J., & McMullen, A. (1994). Self-presentation in everyday interactions: Effects of target familiarity and gender composition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67 (4), 664-673.
References (cont.) O'Neil, J. M., Helms, B. J., Gable, R. K., David, L., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1986). Gender-role conflict scale: College men's fear of feminity. Connecticut: Plentum Publishing Corporation. Rudman, L. A., Goodwin, S. A. (2004). Gender differences in automatic in-group bias: Why do women like women more than men like men? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(4), 494-509. Sriram, N. (2002). The role of gender, ethnicity, and age in intergroup behavior in a naturalistic setting. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51(2), 251-265. Timmers, M., Fischer, A. H., & M. A. S.R. (2003). Ability versus vulnerability: Beliefs about men's and women's emotional behaviour. The Netherlands: Psychology Press Ltd. Williams, J. E., & Best, D. L. (1990). Sex and psyche: Gender and self viewed cross-culturally. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications.