1 / 32

Abbott Secondary Education Initiative

Introduce myself and ASEI. Where it came from? What it says? What some of the implications are for school and district leaders? test. SK:. Abbott Secondary Education Initiative. Education Law Center Information/Discussion Session December 13, 2005. Abbott Secondary Initiative.

salena
Download Presentation

Abbott Secondary Education Initiative

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Introduce myself and ASEI. Where it came from? What it says? What some of the implications are for school and district leaders? test SK: Abbott Secondary Education Initiative Education Law Center Information/Discussion Session December 13, 2005

  2. Abbott Secondary Initiative • Grew out of Abbott X decision, June 03 • Court-ordered review of reform plans for Middle/High Schools • ELC/NJ DOE formed workgroup to develop recommendations • Abbott Secondary Education Initiative is result

  3. Secondary issues • Graduation rates • Achievement gaps • College preparation & readiness • Previous implementation efforts

  4. Graduation rates • NJ has the highest HS graduation rate in the nation • NJ has one of the highest graduation rates for students of color • But this success is not evenly distributed across NJ communities Source: Center for Education Policy, Harvard Civil Rights Project

  5. Abbott Graduation rates • Abbott graduation rates are about 50%. Over 90% elsewhere in NJ. • 40-50% of Abbott grads now use SRA. • In 2002, 9500 students graduated by SRA. • NJ to phase out SRA over 4-6 yrs.

  6. Graduation rates • Urgency of issue for districts, state, communities, economy, NCLB, etc. • Graduation rates vs. test scores as focus of school improvement • Raises broader issues • Requires more fundamental changes

  7. Achievement gaps • About 70% of Abbott students pass HSPA in LA, 45% in Math • NJ averages are about 90% LA, 80% Math • 38% of whites over 25 have college degree. 21% Blacks, 16% Hispanics. • 20% gap between college graduation rates of Black/Hispanic students and whites/Asians. Source: ELC Indicators Reports, NJ Commission on Higher Education

  8. Recent secondary reform efforts in NJ • Standards and tests • WSR developers • Increased “rigor” (eg. American diploma project) • Abbott Secondary Education Initiative

  9. Before getting into specifics of ASEI, wanted to mentioned the national context which also played a significant role in shaping workgroup’s discussions and continues to do so as implementation phase begins. National Context • Increasing national focus on HS reform • Professional and Policy reports (“Breaking Ranks II,” Gov. HS Summit, Gates Foundation & others) • NCLB mandates and sanctions • Opportunity and challenge for NJ

  10. The growing consensus on “best practices” in secondary reform really has two basic sides. Higher academic expectations and demands and a set of reforms to bridge the gap between these expectations and the level of preparation of students entering high school. Lots of complicated issues, but acknowledgement of these two related areas is the basis some common ground between those promoting higher standards and more rigorous tests, and those who see personalization and small as shorthands for the supports needed to bridge gap between where students were and where they were expected to go. National Consensus on HS reform • Increased academic “rigor” • Higher standards, harder, high-stakes tests • College level work for all students • Smaller, personalized school environments • More professional collaboration (eg. teams, planning time, prof. dev.) • Choice, curriculum themes, and inclusion

  11. National Overview • Approx. 17,300 high schools in the US. • 70% of HS students attend schools with over 1,000 students. Nearly 50 percent attend schools with over 1,500 students. • In a typical high-poverty, urban US school, about half of incoming ninth-graders read at a sixth- or seventh-grade level. Source: Alliance for Excellent Education

  12. National context • Hispanic and Black students are more likely than white students to attend • large schools • schools with higher student-teacher ratios • Schools w/high concentrations of poverty Source: Pew Hispanic Center Report

  13. Growing research base of support for small school success. Like money, small size is being established as a necessary, if insufficient, element of secondary reform. Claims for Small Schools • Students in smaller schools: • post higher test scores • pass more courses and accumulate credits • graduate and go on to higher levels of education • Small schools help close achievement gaps between students in different socioeconomic and ethnic groups. Source: Alliance for Excellent Education

  14. Claims for Small Schools • Students in smaller schools have better attendance and lower dropout rates • In NYC, dropout rates for schools under 600 students are half those for schools over 2,000 • In Chicago, small schools have dropout rates one-third lower than big schools. • Smaller schools have lower rates of violence and vandalism & more positive school climate. Source: Alliance for Excellent Education

  15. Reasons for small school success • More personalized, supportive environment for students • More collaborative, team-based environment for staff • More school-based control over major decisions about resources, staffing, and use of time

  16. Concerns about small schools • Selectivity of student population • Need to include more students & staff • Facilities and resource issues • Ability to sustain sports programs, extra-curricular activities, diversity of course choices, etc.

  17. District review of all courses with teacher participation by 2008 to define content and level of courses that carry graduation credit. Abbott Secondary Education Initiative Major elements…. • Small, personalized learning environments for all students, 6-12 • Improved instruction for college/careers • Family advocacy system

  18. ASEI requires SLCs • SLCs for all Abbott HS/MS students by fall 2008 (HS/300, MS/250) • Teacher teams with 2-3 hours of common planning time per week. Stay with students over multiple years. • Curriculum themes. Choice for staff/students.

  19. ASEI supports improved instruction • Access to college prep for all • Curriculum aligned with NJ standards • Review of content in required courses • Professional development to support curriculum innovation and improved classroom practice

  20. Major change in some places. In elementary schools, everyone gets a reading group. In high schools every gets an advisory group. But also supports and time must be in place. In best settings, this becomes a freshman transition elective for 9th graders, a kind of combined academic tutorial, supervised study, support group and Homeroom. Many schools have in form, without content. ASEI requires family advocacy • Each student/family will be matched with a professional staff member in groups of 15-20 students/families per staff member • Advocates meet with assigned students weekly • Meet face-to-face with each family at least twice/yr. • Advocates receive professional support for this role, including training in multicultural perspectives. • Advocates assist in the preparation of an academic plan for each student

  21. ASEI requires • Equitable distribution of student academic profiles and demographic characteristics across SLCs. (no tracking) • Equitable distribution of staff experience and demographic characteristics across SLCs • Facilities planning to support SLCs

  22. Secondary Regulations • “Small organizational structures may include small learning communities and/or small schools in free standing facilities or within larger facilities…. • “Placement of teachers and students shall result in an equitable distribution of student academic achievement profiles, demographic characteristics and teacher experience, qualifications and racial/ethnic diversity…”

  23. Nothing about this is easy. But the reasons for attempting it are inescapable. Too many kids are not graduating. Too many others are graduating without the skills they need to succeed. We are losing too many of our kids to the streets, the unemployment lines, and the prisons. These problems won’t go away with business as usual. Abbott is the best schooling funding decision in the country for poor urban schools and if we don’t do a better job of implementing it, we will lose it. And if we lose it, it will be a disaster for our kids, our public schools, our communities and our state. But there’s a best case too. And that’s that the failure of existing practices to deliver the goods has to some exhausted the traditional bureuacracy that runs the schools and opened up space for change. And while some want to fill that space with vouchers and privatization, we also have a chance to fill it with our own visions of excellence and equity in public education. We can use Abbott to create the kind of schools we want to work in and send our own children to. Ultimately, if the secondary initiative is going to succeed, that’s what it will need to be about. ASEI challenge • Implement secondary initiative or “demonstrate that the goals are being achieved by alternative means.” • “I don't think there is a comprehensive city high school that works right now in New Jersey." Gordon MacInnes, assist. com. of ed.

  24. ASEI team. Sept. 30 rollout ASEI Implementation Timeline • Spring, 2005: ‘Phase I’ Districts selected • Jersey City, Orange, Elizabeth, Bridgeton • Fall. 2005: All districts form planning cmtes. • 2005-2008: NJ DOE provides professional development to all districts. National consultants/ASEI team. • Fall 2008, all Abbott High Schools/Middle Schools implement initiative

  25. Implementation efforts so far • Technical assistance providers • NJ ASEI team and training • Advisory Board • Status of phase one districts • Academic ‘rigor’ districts • Network mtgs. for all Abbotts

  26. Supplemental efforts • Community Foundation of NJ support for youth research/engagement projects • Site visits to model schools • ELC efforts • Need for networking/ across districts and constituencies

  27. Current implementation issues • Status of planning committees • Support for budget & facilities planning • Need for rollout/constituency building • Building technical assistance capacity • Equity concerns • Need for more coherence and higher profile around secondary reform statewide.

  28. Issues for discussion • Questions and concerns? • Who has a stake in seeing the reform succeed? • How do we reach/mobilize those groups? • Connections to make? Audiences to reach? • How to raise the political profile?

  29. Resources • Education Law Centerwww.edlawcenter.org973-624-1815skarp@edlawcenter.org

  30. Resources • Abbott Secondary Education Initiativehttp://www.state.nj.us/njded/abbotts/sei/ • Dr. Penelope Lattimore, Chief of Staff & Director of the Secondary Education Initiatives Phone: (609) 292-7451 Fax: (609) 292-4333 • Dr. Sandra G. Strothers Assistant Director, Secondary Education Initiatives

  31. Resources Technical Assistance Providers • First Things First/IRRE http://www.irre.org/ftf/ • High Schools That Work http://www.sreb.org/programs/hstw/hstwindex.asp

  32. Resources

More Related