1 / 28

I.A.Yazynin, A.I. Drozhdin, A.Apyan 4 th Crystal Channeling Workshop CERN, March 27, 2009

I.A.Yazynin, A.I. Drozhdin, A.Apyan 4 th Crystal Channeling Workshop CERN, March 27, 2009. Simulations for new goniometer and crystals. Outline. Principles of estimation the efficiency Layout of collimation system Optimization of crystal (at channeling): Alignment Curve radius

saima
Download Presentation

I.A.Yazynin, A.I. Drozhdin, A.Apyan 4 th Crystal Channeling Workshop CERN, March 27, 2009

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. I.A.Yazynin, A.I. Drozhdin, A.Apyan 4th Crystal Channeling Workshop CERN, March 27, 2009 Simulations for new goniometer and crystals

  2. Outline • Principles of estimation the efficiency • Layout of collimation system • Optimization of crystal (at channeling): Alignment Curve radius Length Miscut Amorphous layer • Using of volume reflection effect • Comparison efficiency of systems • Simulation of full accelerator • Conclusion

  3. Principles of estimation the system efficiency • Include full transfer amplitude • Global losses – Ig (inefficiency): Number protons lost in accelerator after interaction with the collimation system. Amplitude of such protons bigger then aperture • Aperture losses – Ia: Part of global losses with small transfer amplitudes near the aperture.

  4. Sources of losses • We have two main sources: 1 - crystal or primary collimator 2 - secondary collimator. For estimation of losses we may use: losses protons in target from inelastic interaction ρ - density of protons at the age of collimator • Optimization – choice parameters of crystal with minimum losses at crystal and density on SC.

  5. Inefficiency from secondary collimators • For impact parameter dx>1mm losses are negligible and for design systems with crystals the main part of deflected beam must have the impact parameter bigger than 1mm. • At the equilibrium density D=1p/mm losses will be K1~0.008 • Were considered all 4 edges of secondary collimators: right, left, up, down • K2=0.046

  6. Two variants of simulation • Quick simulation: (~10^6p at 3 hour on PC) Short part of structure ~50 elements (system), amplitude limitation and 3D matrix with momentum part. Use approximation or MC modules. Tasks: Estimation efficiency, investigation parameters, choice optimal crystals. • Full simulation: Use full structure of ring. Defined and analyze losses on elements and radiation damage at consider work regime of accelerator. Ended estimation efficiency of system.

  7. Primary D49, secondary EO3 collimators and bent crystal location at the Tevatron EO straight section. January 20, 2009 A.Drozhdin, A,Apyan

  8. Beam parameters Aperture = 35σ, Amplitude limitation =17σ

  9. Beam guidance • Impact parameter =1.9 um , • rms of angle distribution = 13 urad, • Critical angle = 6.54 urad

  10. Losses of protons versus alignment • Optimum range of work – channeling case ~15urad, Ia~0.02% • In amorphous range Ia~1.5% • I1=l/Ln=5/450=1.1%, Namor~30, Nvr~20, Nch~0.5

  11. Beam distribution atinput E03 • 1 Optimal alignment = - 12 urad(channeling) Impact parameter for chan. part dR ~ 10 mm • 2 Volume reflection =200urad, dR ~ 5 mm

  12. Beam distributions at E03 in horizontal plane

  13. Amplitude distribution Global losses: from A=20 to infinity Aperture losses: from A=20 to 30 mm

  14. Optimization from curve radius of crystal

  15. Optimization from angle deviation of crystal • Optimum angle deviation 200-250 urad • Impact parameter 5-6 mm

  16. Miscut angle • Channeling efficiency (multi turn) • Miscat(mrad) Ich% • 0 88 • 1.6 86 • -1.6 14

  17. O-shape crystal • Density at age of collimator increase in ~5 time • Losses at channeling increase in ~ 2 time

  18. Efficiency of 1 interaction • Pc – input efficiency of channeling • Pd – output efficiency of channeling • Optimum for 1 interaction Rc=30-40m ~15Rcrit • Optimum for multiturn Rc=10-15m ~5Rcrit

  19. Influence of amorphous layer • Density of protons at the edge of SC (Dabs) is increasing slowly with thickness of amorphous layer. (see fig.2 also) • Increasing losses in the main defined by growing inelastically interaction of protons with crystal (Icry). Part of this losses shown by red pointed line (Iabs). Difference between red lines Iacc – Iabs is losses from SC. All losses may defined: Iacc=Icry x c1 + Dabs x c2, c1~0.01, c2~0.8. At new technique the thickness of layer may make very small < 1 µm.

  20. Vertical beam collimation • Losses and beam distributions practically such as for collimation in horizontal plane. • Small changes only from non equal dispersion.

  21. Using the volume reflection effect • Work range for VR rather big ~ 100 µrad (-220—120) (see blue line). • Inefficiency ~ 0.13% that at 8 time smaller than for usual collimation. • For simulation were used 12 crystals Si(110) with Rc=10m and full L=20mm. • Losses from crystal(1 source)~0.07% - half of all global losses

  22. Amplitude distribution of losses 1 – one stage collimation, 2- two stage, 3 – volume reflection, 4 – channeling. • Protons with A>35mm will be lost on the some periods, another in narrow places. In non dependence of really structure the losses on the elements of accelerator will be proportional to the density of losses.

  23. Initial particle population (right) and distributions on X and X’ (left) at crystal entrance for multi-turn simulations. February 3, 2009 A.Drozhdin, A,Apyan

  24. Three possible orientations of crystal with respect to circulating beam: with negative, zero and positive miscut angle. All calculations presented here are done for crystal without amorphous layer. January 20, 2009 A.Drozhdin, A,Apyan

  25. Particle position at crystal surface (top) at perfect alignment of crystal with respect to central line of accelerator for negative miscut angle of -1.6 mrad. Channeled particles, moving along the circular trajectory, leave the crystal exactly at the side surface (bottom line), but particles, passed the crystal as amorphous material along the straight trajectory, are located a little up of the side surface. Particle angle at crystal exit (bottom). Collimators E03 and F172 are at 6 sigma. February 25, 2009 A.Drozhdin, A,Apyan Not channeled Channeled particles Side surface

  26. Particle loss at collimator E03, F172 and crystal for differend miscut angle March 4, 2009 A.Drozhdin, A,Apyan

  27. Particle loss at accelerator aperture excluding collimators D49, E03, F172 and crystal for differend miscut angle March 4, 2009 A.Drozhdin, A,Apyan

  28. CONCLUSIONS • Using of channeling effect decrease the losses in accelerator more than hundred time. The range of angle alignment with good efficiency will be ~15 µrad Optimal curvre radius~10m, angle deviation 200-300 urad. Tolerance of miscat angle <=100urad, amorphous lair ~2um. O-crystal decrease efficiency in 2 time. • Using of volume reflection effect give decrease losses in the ten time. Optimal 12-14 strip with R~10m Very large range of angle alignment with good efficiency ~100 µrad.

More Related