1 / 33

CS 501: Software Engineering

CS 501: Software Engineering. Lecture 7 Requirements I. Administration. Assignment 1: Due Friday at 5:00 p.m. Submit by email. • Feasibility study (group assignment) Remember to send a copy to your client • Survey (individual assignment) Sending email to cs501-l@lists.cs.cornell.edu

rrimmer
Download Presentation

CS 501: Software Engineering

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. CS 501: Software Engineering Lecture 7 Requirements I

  2. Administration Assignment 1: Due Friday at 5:00 p.m. Submit by email. • Feasibility study (group assignment) Remember to send a copy to your client • Survey (individual assignment) Sending email to cs501-l@lists.cs.cornell.edu All mail to this address must be sent from an email address in the cornell.edu domain. To block spam, all mail from outside Cornell is rejected.

  3. Quiz 1 -- Part of Question 1 What are the visibility requirements of your project? How does your process provide visibility? Visibility is an aspect of the software development process -- keeping everybody informed of the progress, e.g. with schedules, milestones, presentations, reports, etc. What risks do you see for your project? How does your process manage risk? Risks can be categorized by (a) function, (b) timeliness, (c) resources.

  4. Lectures on Requirements Analysis and Specification Requirements I: Requirements Analysis Requirements II: Models -- Scenarios and Use Cases Requirements III: Informal Methods of Specification Requirements IV: Formal Methods of Specification

  5. Requirements Analysis and Definition • The requirements analysis and definition establish the system's services, constraints and goals by consultation with users. They are then defined in a manner that is understandable by both users and development staff. • This phase can be divided into: • Requirements analysis • Requirements definition • Requirements specification • Requirements define the function of the system from the client's viewpoint.

  6. Why are requirements important? Causes of failed software projects (Standish Group study, 1994) Incomplete requirements 13.1% Lack of user involvement 12.4% Lack of resources 10.6% Unrealistic expectations 9.9% Lack of executive support 9.3% Changing requirements & specifications 8.8% Lack of planning 8.1% System no longer needed 7.5% The commonest mistake is to build the wrong system.

  7. Requirements in Software Development Feasibility and Planning All process models include a requirements activity Requirements Design Operation and Maintenance Implementation

  8. Requirements in the modified Waterfall Model Feasibility study Requirements System design Program design Implementation (coding) Testing Acceptance & release Operation & maintenance

  9. Requirements in iterative refinement Evaluation/acceptance Requirements Design Implementation

  10. Requirements in Iterative Refinement Concurrent Activities Initial Version Requirements Outline Description Intermediate Versions Design Implementation Final Version

  11. Goals during the requirements phase • Understand the requirements in detail (analysis). • Describe the requirements in a manner that is clear to the client. Ensure that the client understands the description of the requirements and their implications. • Describe the requirements in a manner that is clear to the people who will design and implement the system. The Requirements Documentation is the defining document that describes the goals of the system that is being built. It may form a legal contract between client and software developers.

  12. Requirements Analysis Requirements Specification Requirements Model The requirements process Feasibility Study Feasibility Report Work with the client to understand the requirements Organize the requirements in a systematic and comprehensible manner Documentation of Requirements Requirements Analysis (optional)

  13. Requirements analysis High-level abstract description of requirements: • Specifies external system behavior • Comprehensible by customer, management and users Should reflect accurately what the client wants: • Services that the system will provide • Constraints under which it will operate Often described in a separate document for consultation with the client. "Our understanding of your requirements is that ..."

  14. Requirements analysis: interviews with clients Client interviews are the heart of the requirements analysis and definition. Clients may have only a vague concept of requirements. • Allow plenty of time. • Prepare before you meet with the client • Keep full notes • If you do not understand, delve further, again and again • Repeat what you hear • Small group meetings are often most effective

  15. Requirements analysis 1. Identify the stakeholders: • Who is affected by this system? Client Senior management Production staff Computing staff Customers etc., etc., etc., Example: Andrew project (Carnegie Mellon and IBM) • Who can disrupt this project?

  16. Viewpoint analysis Example: University Admissions System • Applicants • University administration Admissions office Financial aid office Special offices (e.g., athletics, development) • Computing staff Operations Software development and maintenance • Academic departments

  17. Requirements analysis 2. Understand the requirements in depth: • Domain understanding Examples: Philips light bulbs • Understanding of the real requirements of all stakeholders

  18. Requirements analysis 3. Organize the requirements: • Classification into coherent clusters (e.g., legal requirements) • Recognize and resolve conflicts (e.g., functionality v. cost v. timeliness) Example: Dartmouth general ledger system

  19. Realism and verifiability Requirements must be realistic, i.e., it must be possible to meet them. Wrong: The system must be capable of x (if no known computer system can do x at a reasonable cost). Requirements must be verifiable, i.e., it must be possible to test whether a requirement has been met. Wrong: The system must be easy to use. Right: After one day's training an operator should be able to input 50 orders per hour.

  20. New and old systems In requirements analysis it is important to distinguish: • features of the current system • proposed new features Clients often confuse the current system with the underlying requirement. A new system is when there is no existing system. A replacement system (or subsystem) is when a system is built to replace an existing system. A legacy system is an existing system that is not being replaced, but must interface to the new system.

  21. Requirements analysis: negotiation with the client Sometimes the client will request some functionality that is very expensive or impossible. What do you do? • Talk through the requirement with the client. Why is it wanted? Is there an alternative that is equivalent? • Explain the reasoning behind your concern. Explain the technical, organizational, and cost implications. • Be open to suggestions. Is there a gap in your understanding? Perhaps a second opinion might show other approaches. Before the requirements phase is completed the client and development team must resolve these questions.

  22. Functional requirements Requirements about the functions that the system must perform that will be identified by analyzing the use made of the system • Functionality • Data • User interfaces Understanding and specifying the functional requirements is the theme of the next three lectures.

  23. Non-functional requirements Requirements that are not directly related to the functions that the system must perform Product requirements performance, reliability, portability, etc... Organizational requirements delivery, training, standards, etc... External requirements legal, interoperability, etc... Marketing and public relations Example: In the NSDL, the NSF wanted a system that could be demonstrated by the end of 2002

  24. Example of non-functional requirements • Example: Library of Congress Repository • Use systems that the client's staff are familiar with: • Hardware and software systems (IBM/Unix) • Database systems (Oracle) • Programming languages (C and C++) • Recognize that the client is a federal library: • Regulations covering government contracting • Importance of developing a system that will be respected by other major libraries

  25. Unspoken requirements • Examples: • Resistance to change • Departmental friction • Management strengths and weaknesses • Discovering the unspoken requirements is often the most difficult part of developing the requirements.

  26. Requirements documentation (continued on next slide) The form of documentation varies, but is likely to contain the following: General Purpose and scope of system Objectives and criteria for success List of terminology, organizations involved, etc. Description of current system(s)

  27. Requirements documentation (continued) Requirements of proposed system Overview Functional Requirements Usability requirements Non-functional requirements System models Scenarios Use cases Models used during analysis

  28. Requirements documentation (continued) Detailed specifications Business rules, specifications, etc. (e.g., reference to an accounting standard) Data flow, sources of data, data validation etc., etc., A common fault in requirements documentation is to gloss over the details. This results in misunderstandings between the client and the developers.

  29. Evolution of requirements • If the requirements definition is wrong, the system will be wrong. • With complex systems, understanding of requirements always continues to improve. Therefore... • The requirements definition must evolve. • Its documentation must be kept current (but clearly identify versions).

  30. From an old exam question An online information system is being developed using a modified version of the Waterfall model. It is likely to be based on Web technology. (i) How much should the choice of technology be considered during the feasibility study? (ii) In how much detail should the choice of technology be specified during the requirements phase of the project? (iii) At what stage should the decision be made to use an Apache Web Server 2.0 with Tomcat 4.1?

  31. From an exam question (answer) How much should the choice of technology be considered during the feasibility study? During the feasibility study it is important to know that the project is technically feasible. This can be achieved by identifying one possible technical approach and analyzing it sufficiently to show that it is capable of fulfilling the requirements of the system. It can also be used to estimate costs of hardware, software, etc. However, this is only a possible approach. When the system design is carried out in detail, totally different technology may be chosen (e.g., not Web-based).

  32. From an exam question (answer) In how much detail should the choice of technology be specified during the requirements phase of the project? A requirement is a statement of need as expressed by a client. The client's requirements are that the system collects certain data, saves it, and carries out specified processes, e.g., displaying it, performing calculations, etc. The decision of how to store and manipulate the data (e.g., using specific Web technology) is usually not a requirement of the client. It comes later, as part of the design.

  33. From an exam question (answer) At what stage should the decision be made to use an Apache Web Server 2.0 with Tomcat 4.1? This is part of the System Design *

More Related