560 likes | 931 Views
This study examines the incidence of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome (OHSS) in Germany and strategies for prevention. It highlights primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention approaches to reduce OHSS risk and improve patient outcomes.
E N D
Prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in OHSS patients Georg Griesinger University Clinic of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology VVOG Post-Universitaire Studiedag Zemst, 13 Nov 2008
Number of OHSS cases per year in Germany? • 0,41 (incidence DIR) x ~40.000 IVF cycles with ovarian stimulation per year = 164 OHSS cases
= 1.080 OHSS III cases per year in Germany Hum Reprod. 2006 Dec;21(12):3235-40
OHSS III° incidence: 2,1% 95% CI: 1.6 – 2.8 Fertility and Sterility Vol. 85, No. 1, 2006
OHSS [MeSH] AND fatality [MeSH] • death of a 31-year-old woman …who developed a fatal adult respiratory distress syndromeFineschi et al., 2006 • autopsy case of severe OHSS …..28-year-old Japanese female…… who died of rapid respiratory insufficiencySemba et al., 2000 • 21 yearoldwoman ……cerebralinfarction….complete persistent hemiplegia Hwang et al., 1998 • ........................
primaryprevention: intendedtodecreasetheoverallrisk in thegeneralpopulation • secondaryprevention: detectionofpatients atriskandpreventivemeasureonly in thosepatients • tertiaryprevention: prophylaxisoffurtherdamage in patientswith a disease
Long GnRH-agonist protocol De Angelo et al., 2004 E2 = 3,354 pg/ml Sens + Spec = 85% GnRH-antagonist protocol Papanicolaou et al., 2006 18 follicles >10 mm or E2 > 5,000 pg/l Sens = 83% Spec = 84% 5/53 CASES OF SEVERE OHSS STILL MISSED WITH THESE CRITERIA
Noreliabletesttoidentify all OHSS riskpatients • developovarianstimulationroutinesthatareassociatedwith a per se decreasedriskof OHSS (primaryprevention) • developmeasuresof OHSS preventionfor individual riskpatients, whicharesafeandefficacious, andcanthereforebeliberallyutilized (secondaryprevention) • developbettertreatmentregimenforpatientswithonsetof OHSS toavoidfurthercomplications (tertiaryprevention)
Ovarian stimulation • OHSS incidence reduction • Natural cycle IVF √ • In vitro Maturation √ • Cycle cancellation √ efficacy ? ? ---
Number-needed-to-treat-to-harm with a GnRH-agonist long protocol for OHSS III Kolibianakis et al., Hum Reprod Update 2006 EXPECTED OHSS III° INCIDENCE: 3.5% RR = 0.47, 95% CI 0.27–0.82, P = 0.01 NNT TO HARM = 53 (39 - 159) 3,46%
GnRH-antagonist vs GnRH-agonist long OHSS III Crude incidence of OHSS = 1.5%
A mild treatment strategy for in-vitro fertilisation: a randomised non-inferiority trial Incidence of OHSS = 1.4% Heijnen et al.,Lancet 2007; 369: 743–49
Coasting OHSS II-III in 3-10% Delvigne & Rozenberg, HRupdate, 2002
GnRH -antagonists
Novel concepts in Coasting E2 < 3000 pg/ml ? 4 follicles ≥ 16mm? Hyper response? hCG FSH FSH GnRH-agonist daily GnRH-antagonist daily n= 85, coasting ~ 1.5 days Ongoing pregnancy rate: ~ 60 % Severe OHSS: 1.5 - 7.5 % Gustofson et al., Hum Reprod 2006 Gustofson et al., Fertil Steril 2006
Novel concepts in Coasting RCT: 192 patients Aboulghar et al., RBMonline 2007
Coasting in Antagonist protocols Bahceci et al., 2006; Farhi et al., 2008
The final solutionto OHSS prevention….. • AbolishhCGas a triggeringagent!?
GnRH-agonisttrigger Gonen et al., 1990
Luteal phase after agonist trigger? • Progesteroneserumvalueswith • NO • lutealphasesupplementation Day ofadministrationofGnRH-a orhCG Beckers et al., 2003
Drastic luteolysis… • Will itprevent OHSS? Kol S, Fertil Steril 2004
OHSS I-II: RR with 95% confidence intervals (heterogeneity p = 0.57) OHSS III: RR with 95% confidenceintervals (heterogeneity p = 0.90) Update of: Griesinger et al., Hum Reprod update 2005
Evidence from observational, uncontrolled trials16 publicationstotal n= 1,091 OHSS risk patients a single case reported: late-onset OHSS in a pregnant woman Update of: Griesinger et al., RBMonline 2006
No difference between • 0.2 triptorelin or 0.5 mg buserelin and hCG • no. of oocytes • no. of MII oocytes • fertilisationrate • embryo Score • BUT: • ongoing PR drastically reduced Human Reproduction Update, 2006
Cryopreservation slow cooling vitrification 2 sec. - 50.000°C/min
Mean number of ETs: 2.1 Mean number of embryos transferred 2.1 Mean time-to-conception 21 weeks Cumulative incidence positive hCG test leading to live birth
Reduced hCG dose? • RCT, n= 80 PCOS • GnRH-antagonist protocol Kolibianakis et al., 2007
low dose hCG & OHSS? • Retrospective study, n=94 cycles • > 2,500 - 4,000 pg/mL 5000 IU • >4000 3300 IU Schmidt et al., 2007
Half dose/low dose hCG & OHSS? • Observational pilot study • 2.500 vs. 5.000 IU hCG • n = 21 OHSS high-risk patients • 62% ongoing pregnancy rate • 0 % OHSS Nargund et al., 2007 Craft, 2007
Clinical pregnancy rate per ET Griesinger, GebFra 2006
Novel concept: Luteal phase antagonist hCG 3 dayslater…. early OHSS GnRH-antagonist daily GnRH-antagonist daily FSH Report on 3 cases with early-onset OHSS Lainas et al., RBMonline 2007
Novel concepts in treatment: Cabergolin Background: Vascular fluid leakage VEGF VEGF R1 Cabergoline Dopamine R agonist Alvarez et al, JCEM 2007
RCT: placebo-controlled Intervention: Cab 0.5 mg, day hCG hCG+8 Patients: oocyte donors Inclusion: > 20 oocytes retrieved Alvarez et al, JCEM 2007 & Alvarez, Hum Reprod 2007