1 / 12

Bad housing wrecks lives

Bad housing wrecks lives. Shelter’s Children’s Service Improving Joint Working between Housing and Children’s Services How can Scrutiny help? Peta Cubberley Regional Children’s Coordinator (London/SE). Aims and Objectives. Aim

roz
Download Presentation

Bad housing wrecks lives

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Bad housing wrecks lives Shelter’s Children’s Service Improving Joint Working between Housing and Children’s Services How can Scrutiny help? Peta Cubberley Regional Children’s Coordinator (London/SE)

  2. Aims and Objectives • Aim • To inform Scrutiny Officers in London of Shelter’s Children’s Services in London and nationally. • To highlight the issue of children’s homelessness in London and the impact on children’s well-being and life chances. • Objectives: • To encourage scrutiny and overview functions to consider local authorities’ joint working between their housing and children’s services. • To urge that children’s housing (homelessness, bad housing, overcrowding) is considered as a cross-cutting issue across all policy areas.

  3. Regional Children’s Policy Coordinators • Principal areas of work: • Children’s Centre Work • To coordinate the delivery of Shelter’s housing advice services to children’s centres in England • Good Practice Work • To facilitate the wider take up of more effective models of service delivery to children • Policy Influencing Work • To influence policy and implementation at national, regional and local levels where they relate to children and housing

  4. The extent of the problem in London • As at end September 2008, CLG reported statistics (P1E data) from Local Authorities in London show: • 49,955households living in temporary accommodation. • Of these, 39,568had dependent or expected children. • The total number of dependent or expected children in these households was 76,429. (This is 2/3of the total figure in England - 104,635). • Overcrowding: • Over 200,000 households are living in overcrowded conditions in London – the majority of whom are social sector tenants. 4

  5. Every “Homeless” Child Matters? • How the ECM outcomes are undermined by bad housing • Being healthy • Increased risk of ill health, disability, mental and emotional health problems and a wide range of respiratory problems. • Staying safe • Increased risk of accidents in the home; higher risk of isolation and fear in community. • Enjoying and achieving • Higher risk of lower educational achievement, as homeless children miss more days of school through lateness, truancy, exclusions, bullying. • Making a positive contribution • Increased instances of behavioural problems such as aggression, hyperactivity & impulsivity, also impacting educational & social outcomes. • Achieving economic well-being • Increased risk of family being caught in a cycle of poverty, unemployment and social exclusion, due to lower levels of educational achievement and poorer heath.

  6. Government guidance • Guidance for strategic managers in Housing Services, Children’s Services and their partner agencies. • Published May 2008 • Thematic areas: • 16 & 17 year olds • Care leavers • Children of families living in temporary accommodation • Children of families found intentionally homeless • Shelter involved in development of document. www.communities.gov.uk/publications/housing/goodpracticeguide 6

  7. Where are the Interfaces between Children’s Services and Housing? • Inter Agency Governance • Clear commitment from DCS, Housing, Children’s Trust Boards, LSPs, Lead Members, LSCBs on joint up working. • Integrated Strategies • CYPPs & Homelessness Strategies - thorough involvement in development, implementation and monitoring of policies. • Opportunities for joint funding identified & shared resources. • Integrated Processes • Joint Protocols & Pre-action protocol arrangements • Use of CAF by housing officers. • Information Sharing – housing department informs CYPS where families in TA have been placed. • Integrated Front Line Delivery • Co-location of staff between housing and CYPS. • More outreach, more shared training, more understanding in schools & children’s centres of risks to outcomes for homeless children.

  8. Opportunities to consider housing issues • Example: • Provision of 0-5 Services in Hackney • Report included a section on housing which identified the formal and informal links between housing and children’s centres. However, the report also identified gaps, and made two recommendations to the commission: • Involvement of housing providers on children's centre steering groups to foster mutually beneficial working relationships between them. • Undertake analysis of where and when a housing advice surgery might be offered to parents as part of the universal services provided to children’s services. • This report provides an excellent “hook” for my engagement with Hackney’s CYP and Housing services on this, and ultimately other, areas of joint working. 8

  9. Other opportunities….housing is a cross-cutting issue Joint working between housing & children’s services – Using the ‘checklists’ in the joint CLG/DCSF guidance, to scrutinise to what extent is your authority meeting these recommendations? Information sharing/partnership working – To what extent are arrangements in place to share information across housing and CYPS (children’s centres, schools, youth services, health services)? Links to child mobility; child protection; no child ‘slipping through the net’. Child Poverty Agenda – To what extent are housing and CYPS working together to: Improve access to housing advice/debt/benefits advice?; Mitigate the impact on children of bad housing/overcrowding/TA. What other examples/opportunities can you think of? DISCUSSION

  10. Outcomes to date – Children’s Centres • Children’s Service Advice Line available to all Children’s Centres in England. • 575 cases opened by Children’s Service Advice Line • Developed partnership with ‘Home-Start’ providing access of our advice line to further 275 schemes nationally. • Shelter Advisers providing Housing Advice sessions from Children’s Centres in all regions – subject to capacity. • Shelter Advisers delivering ‘Housing Information Workshops’ – in London alone over 120 Children’s Centre workers reached. • Many Children’s Centres ‘linked in’ to Shelter’s local offices and building relationships & improving effective signposting to them. • More Housing Departments agreeing to share details of families placed in Temporary Accommodation with Children's Centres. 10

  11. Outcomes to date – Policy Influencing • Audited a two tier authority’s Joint Protocol on 16/17 Year Olds • Promoted pooled funding to provide TA outreach workers in Children’s Centres • Influenced bid for DCSF Child Development Grant pilot to be targeted at children in temporary accommodation • Influenced planned refurbishment of a family hostel which will provide Children’s Centre and Extended School outreach. • Influenced Homelessness Strategies including aims to reduce children’s school moves; introduce 16/17 year old protocol; develop peer education; introduce systems for information sharing; use of Notify by children's service staff. • Secured commitments to deliver CAF training to Housing Officers • Involvement in Government Offices , JISPs, Child Poverty strategies and local children’s centre networks. 11

  12. Bad housing wrecks lives For more information please contact: Peta Cubberley – London & South East 0844 515 1272 peta_cubberley@shelter.org.uk

More Related