1 / 34

The California Integrated Seismic Network: Project Status

The California Integrated Seismic Network: Project Status. Program Management Group Presented to CISN Steering and Advisory Committees at UC Berkeley, 30 August 2006. Quick Review of Technical Status. Statewide Monitoring. Focused Urban Monitoring. Dual Data Transmission.

royal
Download Presentation

The California Integrated Seismic Network: Project Status

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The California Integrated Seismic Network:Project Status Program Management Group Presented to CISN Steering and Advisory Committees at UC Berkeley, 30 August 2006

  2. Quick Review of Technical Status

  3. Statewide Monitoring

  4. Focused UrbanMonitoring

  5. Dual Data Transmission • CGS CIT • 5 strong motion stations in metropolitan Los Angeles region • UCB CIT • 30 strong motion & broadband stations statewide • Goal to exchange 60 stations

  6. CISN Backbone • 5 dedicated T1 links • Auto-failover to Internet via IP tunnels • Monitoring/alarming software operational • Networks now exchanging CISN seismic data

  7. Integration and Standardization • Real and near real-time integration of parametric and waveform data from 13 seismic networks • PG&E as of 8/17/2006 • Calpine soon? • Developing software to integrate of CGS, CI/USGS, NCSN, and UCB real-time systems

  8. CISN Webpage

  9. Progress toward Statewide Monitoring through CISN Software

  10. Melding of many complex systems Earthworm front-end TriNet back-end NCEDC/SCEDC data archiving Java, C, C++, Perl, SQL, Fortran, Solaris, Windows, Oracle, etc.. Same software across CISN means: Same configurations, same products Full parametric exchange All waveforms used (including NSMP, CGS) New methods easier to implement Failover behavior can be modeled and understood • Code is now developed by all partners • An example of how CISN works well • An example of how CISN doesn’t work well

  11. SCSN: RT system

  12. NC ≠ SC Menlo Park Berkeley • Network split across the SF Bay • Requirement for robust operation if one half fails • Different systems • Field hardware • Telemetry • Institutions • Software • Cannot compute ML for all quakes

  13. Required development for NC implementation • Replaced proprietary messaging software with CMS software • Implementation of “location” codes (statewide) • Station metadata • Proxy waveserver • Implementation of Md in Trinet software • ML calibration (statewide) • Testing, testing, testing

  14. Post-processing Prototype functional as of July, 2006 Md implemented and Q/C’ed SNC → SNCL ready Testing and training 10/15/2006 switch Real-time processing After post-processing switch Conversion of alarming software New quick-review Testing 12/31/2006 switch NCSS Software Transition Status

  15. CISN: Statewide Version 1.0 • Will rely on three real-time services: • Continuous “reduced” amplitude exchange • “Pick” exchange • Proxy waveserver for post-processing • Real-time alarming • NC and SC will each alarm for their authoritative box for M<4.0 and statewide for M≥4.0. • The QDM filter will post the first solution, which in some cases may be superseded by the authoritative solution, or possibly NEIC. • Statewide ShakeMap • Produce statewide ShakeMap at three centers (PAS, MP/BK, and CGS). • Operate one statewide web portal for ShakeMap • Post-Processing and Archiving • Each center (PAS and MP/BK) will post-process and archive parameters and waveforms in it's region of responsibility. • CGS will post-process and distribute SM data and engineering quick reports. • Timeline: Prototype by 30 June 2007

  16. Budget and Funding

  17. Funding Status (review) • The CISN Strategic Plan goals were established for the level of funding that we anticipated in 2001. • At its inception in 2001 the CISN asked OES for $6.6M per year. • This funding was cut to and has remained at the $2.4M per year for the last three years. • Full ANSS funding expected in 2001 and subsequent years has not occurred. • level-funding for CIT, UCB, and USGS NCSN/SCSN and NSMP network operations for the last three years

  18. USGS/ANSS $7.7M NCSN (USGS Menlo Park) UCB/REDI and UCB/NCEDC SCSN (Caltech & USGS Pasadena) SCEDC UCLA (Factor) UCSD (Anza) NSMP apportioned OES $2.4M Caltech UCB CGS CGS/CSMIP $5.4M Buildings Lifelines Ground response (~1/3 of budget effort) UC Berkeley $0.5M SCEC $0.15M Caltech ~$0.2M USArray ~$0.2M NOAA - $0.1M CISN 2005 Funding Overview

  19. CISN Funding Total ~$16.65M

  20. 9% 12% 47% 10% 7% 15% CISN Expenditures Expenditures for California Seismic Monitoring Operate and maintain stations DataCenters Real-time operations and response Management Process improvement new products New/Upgraded stations

  21. New Developments

  22. V1.3 released 8/29/2006 “Web services” support Better GIS layers Email integration Scale dependent GIS layers Sort on magnitude Events with tsunami info tagged ~420 users registered ~75 users connected CISN Display

  23. dot.ca.gov emd.wa.gov hko.gov.hk kmi.com lacofd.org meteorology.gov.mv morganhill.ca.gov mwdh2o.com nbcuni.com noaa.gov abc.com atsb-malaysia.com.my BNSF.com dot.ca.gov calquake.com cityofalhambra.org co.monterey.ca.us co.sanmateo.ca.us conservation.ca.gov dogami.state.or.us Connected Users of CISN Display • oes.ca.gov • rdmd.ocgov.com • redlandspolice.org • scd.hawaii.gov • semprautilites.com • solanocounty.com • tribune.com • usace.army.mil • water.ca.gov • wsdot.wa.gov

  24. ENS:Earthquake Notification System • User-configurable E-mail & SMS messages • Adopted by ANSS • 41,000+ users

  25. CISN Alert Map (prototype)

  26. CISN and EarthScope • SAFOD • Data recording by NCSN • Data archiving at NCEDC • USArray • Data Sharing from existing stations • Sharing of technology • Plate Boundary Observatory • Borehole stations near fault zones • GPS

  27. CISN/USGS/SCECCollaboration on Earthquake Early Warning • CISN • Provide waveforms and implement front end processing • Caltech/USGS/ UC Berkeley • Development and testing of individual algorithms • SCEC • Comparison of performance of algorithms • Testing for great earthquakes using synthetics

  28. Conversion of NCSN backbone telemetry • Data collected at nodes • Analog telemetry precluded upgrades • Mix of satellite, leased land lines, and microwave • 6 year project

  29. NetQuakes RFP • USGS SEED funding to develop new SM instrumentation for urban areas • Designed to accelerate rate of new installations • Current bottlenecks • Purchase Cost • Permitting • Installation • Telemetry costs

  30. San Fernando CISN & ANSS TriNet Number/Yr 3600 more stations needed to achieve Vision 2005 goal of 5500 stations It will take ~70 years at this rate

  31. NetQuakes hardware • COTS computer hardware (~$500) • Removable memory cards • Full O/S (Linux?) • Wireless (802.11g) capability • AC power with modest battery backup • No GPS • NTP synchronization (±10 msec accuracy) • ANSS TIC WG-D Class “C-B” hardware (~$300) • Digitizer: ≥ 16bits resolution • Sensor: ≥ 87dB dynamic range over 0.1-35Hz

  32. Functionality • Triggered only • Data queued until successfully uploaded • Uploaded data used when event is detected by regional seismic network • Periodic SOH messages issued • Periodic queries to check for new software • Periodic NTP synchronization • Ability to add new algorithms

  33. Installation and Servicing • Volunteer hosts solicited • Technician installs device • Bolt cradle, orient device, configure device, determine GPS coordinates • Hosts swap out batteries and bad units (not technicians)

  34. NetQuakes Status • Proposals from vendors due 9/6/2006 • Award to be made by 9/26/2006 • At least 3 prototypes • Up to 250 more units • Prototypes due no later than 6/30/2007 • Goal is 100+ new urban SM stations/year

More Related