1 / 54

Controversies in the Management of Subacromial Impingement

Controversies in the Management of Subacromial Impingement. Yemi Pearse MA (Oxon) FRCS(Orth) Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon The London Shoulder Partnership Shoulder Unit St George’s Hospital 16 th November 2016. www.thelondonshoulderpartnership.co.uk.

rosser
Download Presentation

Controversies in the Management of Subacromial Impingement

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Controversies in the Management of Subacromial Impingement Yemi Pearse MA (Oxon) FRCS(Orth) Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon The London Shoulder Partnership Shoulder Unit St George’s Hospital 16th November 2016 www.thelondonshoulderpartnership.co.uk

  2. Subacromial impingement / Subacromial pain syndrome Most common presentation of pain and dysfunction in middle age shoulder but treatment is controversial Conflict between advocates of surgery and advocates of physical therapy for management of subacromial pain Polarized views regarding efficacy of either

  3. Ketola S, Lehtinen J, Arnala I, Nissinen M, Westenius H, Sintonen H, Aronen P, Konttinen YT, Malmivaara A, Rousi T. Does arthroscopic acromioplasty provide any additional value in the treatment of shoulder impingement syndrome?: a two-year randomised controlled trial. JBJS(Br) October 2009 Arthroscopic acromioplasty provides no clinically important effects over a structured and supervised exercise programme alone in terms of subjective outcome or cost-effectiveness when measured at 24 months. Structured exercise treatment should be the basis for treatment of shoulder impingement syndrome, with operative treatment offered judiciously until its true merit is proven.

  4. Controversy 2.5-fold increase in 10 years between 1996 and 2006 in number of acromioplasties performed in New York In last 10 years in UK 746% increase in arthroscopic subacromial decompression Excellent results in cohort studies for both surgery and physical therapy

  5. The problem Poor understanding of pathology Poor real evidence for all interventions - no placebo controlled trials (ethics and practicality)

  6. A painful condition resulting from impingement of the rotator cuff under the coracoacromial arch. Neer 1972. Ache at anterolateral border of acromion radiating to upper arm Pain is worse with overhead activity or repetitive work Painful arc on elevation of the arm

  7. Neer described 3 stages of impingement syndrome • Oedema and haemorrhage of the bursa and cuff (patients less than 25 years old) - No surgery required • Irreversible changes such as fibrosis and tendinitis of the rotator cuff (25 to 40 years old) – bursectomy and CAL division after 18 months of conservative treatment (acromioplasty usually not required) • More chronic changes (eg partial or complete tears) associated with type III acromion - anterior acromioplasty

  8. Difference in acromial morphology noted as early as 1875 by Hamilton and 1909 by Goldthwaite Bigliani 1986 139 cadaver shoulders 3 types of acromial morphology • Flat (17%) • Curved (43%) • Hooked (40%)

  9. - No correlation between acromial shape and cuff pathology - Progression to cuff tear cannot be from acromial abrasion as most partial thickness tears are joint side or intrasubstance - No evidence of inflammatory cells and “tendinitis” on histological evaluation

  10. So what is impingement?

  11. Rotator cuff muscles (in particularly supraspinatus) create a virtual centre of rotation for glenohumeral motion Upward vector force (deltoid) is converted to a turning moment as deltoid acts around virtual centre of rotation

  12. Cuff deficiency will result in proximal humeral migration due to reduced opposition to pull of deltoid

  13. In vivo (load bearing static xrays) humeral head remains centred on elevation in normal subjects but rises in patients with rotator cuff pathology In vivo (video fluoroscopy) humeral head rises between 45o and 90o in healthy subjects with fatigue Dynamic ultrasound shows that the CAL bulges in rotator cuff disease Wang et al. Ultrasound Med Biol 2009

  14. CAL is poorly named • not a ligament but a retinaculum • increases efficiency of muscle pull by avoiding bowstringing • Contact between supraspinatus and coracoacromial arch is inevitable and probably desirable • BUT compression of the tendon is bad

  15. Tendon homeostasis Repair Damage

  16. Tendon homeostasis TIMPs MMPs

  17. Tendinosis Damage Repair

  18. Tendinosis Appropriate mechanical loading results in homeostasis Inappropriate loading results in upregulation of MMPs and catabolic cytokines no mechanical stimulus (tendons need tensile load) excessive mechanical stimulus (too much tensile load) compression (tendons hate compressive load) Thornton et al. Br J Sports Med 2008

  19. Tendinosis Absence of inflammatory cells Tenocytes change characteristics - Change in N:C ratio - Change in EM composition - Become secretory rather than synthesizing cells Note fibre disorientation Efficiency of load transmission from muscle to bone declines

  20. Supraspinatus has greater susceptibility than rest of rotator cuff - Compressive forces from coracoacromial arch - Isometric (unlike internal and external rotators) therefore greater interface stresses

  21. Failure of tendon homeostasis - TENDINOPATHY

  22. Supraspinatus works harder Poor load transmission Failure of tendon homeostasis - TENDINOPATHY

  23. Supraspinatus works harder Poor load transmission Pathological tensile load on tendon Failure of tendon homeostasis - TENDINOPATHY

  24. Supraspinatus works harder Poor load transmission Failure of tendon homeostasis - TENDINOPATHY Tendon compressed against CAL Muscle fatigues more quickly Humeral head rises with abduction/ elevation Narrowing of acromiohumeral distance

  25. Supraspinatus works harder Poor load transmission Pathological tensile load on tendon Failure of tendon homeostasis - TENDINOPATHY Tendon compressed against CAL Muscle fatigues more quickly Humeral head rises with abduction/ elevation Narrowing of acromiohumeral distance

  26. Support by other cuff Increase aerobic capacity Supraspinatus works harder Poor load transmission Pathological tensile load on tendon Failure of tendon homeostasis - TENDINOPATHY Tendon compressed against CAL Increased elasticity in CAL Muscle fatigues more quickly Humeral head rises with abduction/ elevation Narrowing of acromiohumeral distance

  27. Support by other cuff - Pain inhibition - Supraspinatus works harder Poor load transmission Pathological tensile load on tendon Failure of tendon homeostasis - TENDINOPATHY Tendon compressed against CAL PAIN Muscle fatigues more quickly Humeral head rises with abduction/ elevation Narrowing of acromiohumeral distance

  28. Support by other cuff E - Pain inhibition - Supraspinatus works harder A Poor load transmission Pathological tensile load on tendon Failure of tendon homeostasis - TENDINOPATHY D Tendon compressed against CAL PAIN Muscle fatigues more quickly Humeral head rises with abduction/ elevation B Narrowing of acromiohumeral distance C -

  29. A – Supraspinatus works harder Reduce work of suprapsinatus by addressing - Capsular restriction - Glenohumeral instability - Poor scapular control - Poor kinetic chain / core strength - Poor trunk rotation

  30. Increase “travel distance” by: • Rotation of trunk • Medialisation of scapula • External rotation of shoulder

  31. With decreased travel distance shoulder muscles have to work harder to achieve same angular velocity

  32. Support by other cuff Increase aerobic capacity B – Muscle fatigues Supraspinatus works harder Poor load transmission Failure of tendon homeostasis - TENDINOPATHY Often adaptive changes have already occurred and aerobic conditioning exercises can be “flogging a dead horse” Offload supraspinatus by addressing • Inappropriate technique • Inappropriate activities • (Inadequate conditioning) Tendon compressed against CAL Muscle fatigues more quickly Humeral head rises with abduction/ elevation Narrowing of acromiohumeral distance

  33. C – Narrowing of acromiohumeral distance Address posteroinferior capsular restriction • Posterior capsule stretches • Sleeper stretches

  34. C – Narrowing of acromiohumeral distance Address scapular dyskinesia Scapula rotates during abduction 2.5 to 24 degrees GH:ST ratio = 4.3:1 24 degrees to full abduction GH:ST ratio = 5:4 Abnormal GH:ST ratio narrows outlet

  35. D – Tendinopathy Orthobiologics • PRP • Autologous blood • Growth factors “Mechanomodulators” • ECSWT • Needling

  36. E – Pain inhibition Acupuncture Analgesia and NSAIDs Steroid injection

  37. Accurate assessment and tailored therapy One size does not fit all and multiple potential ways to “break the vicious cycle” Need to have been alive long enough to develop tendon degeneration and impingement is almost always secondary in young and in absence of structural lesion correctable

  38. Support by other cuff E - Pain inhibition - Supraspinatus works harder A Poor load transmission Pathological tensile load on tendon Failure of tendon homeostasis - TENDINOPATHY D Tendon compressed against CAL PAIN Muscle fatigues more quickly Humeral head rises with abduction/ elevation B Narrowing of acromiohumeral distance C -

  39. Support by other cuff E - Pain inhibition - Supraspinatus works harder A Poor load transmission Break vicious circle Escape from tendinopathy to tendon homeostasis Pathological tensile load on tendon Failure of tendon homeostasis - TENDINOPATHY D Tendon compressed against CAL PAIN Muscle fatigues more quickly Humeral head rises with abduction/ elevation B Narrowing of acromiohumeral distance C -

  40. Accurate assessment and tailored therapy 4 mechanical techniques applied sequentially while patient performs the activity or movement that most closely reproduces their symptoms 1. Techniques to reduce the thoracic kyphosis 2. Scapular positioning techniques 3. Humeral head positioning procedures 4. Pain and symptom neuromodulation procedures

  41. Accurate assessment and tailored therapy 4 mechanical techniques applied sequentially while patient performs the activity or movement that most closely reproduces their symptoms Identifying technique(s) that reduce symptoms Focus on these

  42. Judicious use of steroid injection Action unknown Long acting pain killer – stop pain inhibition Anabolic effect on supraspinatus and other cuff muscles (kick start versus temporary boost) I only ever give one

  43. Surgery is for when therapy fails Accept humeral head will migrate proximally Accommodate this with subacromial decompression • Reduces compression on tendon • Breaks vicious cycle Continue to optimise adaptive changes

  44. With this approach controversy is artificial Comparative studies are meaningless and miss the point No placebo controlled trials for either operative or non-operative treatment but numerous cohort studies Recommend • Detailed assessment • Shoulder symptom modification procedure • Surgery if correctables corrected but symptoms persist

  45. Questions?

  46. Clinical assessment Age (usually 40 +) Anterosuperior pain “in the muscle” Weakness may be present but is secondary to pain and should resolve if pain is abolished Apparent stiffness may also be secondary to pain Clinical tests lack sensitivity and specificity

  47. Clinical assessment Neer 75% to 97% sensitivity 30% to 50% specificity reported Hawkins 92% sensitivity 25% to 45% specificity reported Kessel and Watson painful arc 30% to 97% sensitivity 10% to 80% specificity reported

More Related