1 / 15

CES Discussion on Internet Data Reporting

CES Discussion on Internet Data Reporting. EDR discussion. EDR discussion. EDR discussion. EDR discussion. EDR discussion. EDR discussion. EDR discussion. EDR discussion. EDR discussion. Chinese paper. Development of electronic reporting underway since 1998

ross-wagner
Download Presentation

CES Discussion on Internet Data Reporting

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CES Discussion on Internet Data Reporting

  2. EDR discussion

  3. EDR discussion

  4. EDR discussion

  5. EDR discussion

  6. EDR discussion

  7. EDR discussion

  8. EDR discussion

  9. EDR discussion

  10. EDR discussion

  11. Chinese paper • Development of electronic reporting underway since 1998 • Special feature: sharing data with local statistical bureaux • Currently implemented EDR for 5000 out of 180,000 enterprises (largest) • These account for 40-50% of assets and revenues • Excellent response rate: over 90% (monthly survey) • Used EDR for high priority special surveys (e.g. SARS)

  12. EDR discussion -- conclusions • You pay for high security • Generalised approach preferable • EDR should not be “add-on” but should involve re-thinking of “questionnaire” and a multi-mode processing flow • Interruption and resumption of questionnaire completion seems important (for longer forms) – but with design trade-offs involving security, complexity

  13. EDR discussion -- conclusions • Editing by respondents is helpful for quality – but too much of it can make EDR less user-friendly • Understanding respondent motivation is still in infancy

  14. Questions • To all authors: • What approach to use to protect the data from interception in both directions? Experiences? • Experiences with provision of past data? • Any unreported experiences with respondent research? • Should we create an ad hoc working group on EDR?

  15. Questions • To Austria: • Why have you restricted EDR to single business enterprises? • Do you have plans to expand EDR to other types of surveys ? • To Finland: • Why have you adopted both an in-house and a contracted approach? When do you use each? • Which one works better? • To Canada: - What are the advantages/disadvantages of adopting a highly secure “public key infrastructure” security approach? • Why do you have 2 approaches for collecting data electronically-EXCEL and Web ? • To China: what plans do you have to expand EDR to large number or respondents?

More Related