slide1 n.
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
Integration of Structural Engineering into Fire Engineering Design

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 20

Integration of Structural Engineering into Fire Engineering Design - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 109 Views
  • Uploaded on

Integration of Structural Engineering into Fire Engineering Design LEUNG Siu-man Chief Structural Engineer Buildings Department. Building (Construction) Regulation 90 – Fire Resisting Construction. Every building shall be designed and constructed so as to –

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Integration of Structural Engineering into Fire Engineering Design' - rosalyn-lynch


Download Now An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
slide1
Integration of Structural Engineering into Fire Engineering Design

LEUNG Siu-manChief Structural EngineerBuildings Department

building construction regulation 90 fire resisting construction
Building (Construction) Regulation 90 – Fire Resisting Construction

Every building shall be designed and constructed so as to –

  • Inhibit the spread of fire within the building and to nearby buildings by dividing the building into compartments;
  • Provide adequate resistance to the spread of fire and smoke by the separation of different uses in a building by compartment walls and floors and by the separation of the building from any adjoining building or site;
  • Maintain the stability of the building in case of fire; and
  • Provide adequate resistance to the spread of fire over the roof of one building to another having regard to the position of the building.

In other words, every building shall be designed and constructed so

as to provide adequate resistance to spread of fireand smoke and

to maintain its stability.

high casualty fire incidents in hk
High casualty fire incidents in HK
  • Garley Building (1996) : 40 fatalities
  • Mei Foo Sun Chuen (1997) : 9 fatalities

Practice Note for AP & RSE 204 issued in 1998 :

  • to provide guidance on fire engineering approach to meet the fire safety objective and performance requirements of B(C)R90
fire engineering design
Fire Engineering Design

Active Fire Services Installation

Passive Fire Design

Fire Safety Management System

Total Fire Safety in Buildings

slide7

Three dominant criteria to ensure that the fire resistant compartment is maintained so as to allow sufficient time for safe evacuation and rescue operation – The “Fire Resistance Period” concept

  • Insulation (I) to prevent developing excessive temperature on the unexposed surface of the building element;
  • structural Integrity (E) to maintain the separating function in preventing spread of flame and smoke;
  • ability for Load-Bearing (R) structural element to support the load under fire.
structural fire engineering generally comprises the consideration of three aspects
Structural Fire Engineering generally comprises the consideration of three aspects :
  • Modeling of possible fire scenarios
  • Calculation of heat transfer to the structure
  • Assessment of the structural response at

elevated temperatures

example of a restrained partition compartment wall
Example of a restrained partition compartment wall

The 3m high concrete compartment partition wall, which is

constructed of d=100mm thick and restrained both at the top by a

fire protected steel beam and the bottom by the concrete floor slab,

is subjected to a natural fire condition with the fire exposed wall

surface at a temperature T0 higher than the fire unexposed wall

surface.

slide10
Assuming there is negligible flexible movement at the top and bottom

restraints, the restrained bow (or lateral thermal displacement) yR [1]

2 HT0 gap

 H

For T0 = 900 C ;  = 9.0 x 10-6 /C; E = 20,000 N/mm2

H = 3000mm ; the gap at the top of compartment wall = 10mm

yR = 132mm

The restraint stress R

E ( T0 gap )

H

R = 95 MPa

 (i.e. which is much greater than the crushing strength of partition wall of 20 MPa)

[1] O’Connor D J, Structural Engineering design for fire safety in buildings. The Structural Engineer/ Volume 73/ No. 4, 21 February 1995

sensitivity study of parameter on integrity of compartment wall under fire condition
Sensitivity study of parameter on integrity of compartment wall under fire condition
  • (N.B. The basic case in bold: Gap = 10mm, L = 3m and T0 = 900 oC)
  • From the sensitivity analysis, the following findings are observed: -
  • Sufficient gap size would significantly reduce the restraint stress in the compartment wall
  • The increase in compartment wall height would increase the restraint stress mildly whereas the increase in bow deflection is much greater
  • The change in temperature would significantly change the restraint stress in the compartment wall
according to bs 5950 part 8 the limiting temperature of steel members in tension is as follow
According to BS 5950 Part 8, the limiting temperature of steel members in tension is as follow:

Table 1

slide14

The forces taken by each steel rod at fire limit state calculated by using a finite element program SAFE, the structural capacities of steel rods at ambient temperature provided by the manufactures, the calculated load ratio of the steel rods, and the respective limiting temperatures derived by interpolation of Table 1 are as follow:

slide15
Deficiency

The platform is supported by hanger rods which can

only take tensile loads. Excessive relative elongation

of individual rods heated up under fire may render

these affected rods losing their supporting action (i.e.

no longer in tension). This will cause a load

redistribution and increase the load on the other

remaining hanger rods jeopardizing their original fire

limit state designed for.

slide16
Common Problems
  • FRP ratings are mainly evaluated for individual building elements only
  • Structural aspect concentrated on strength and relied on FRP ratings as guideline on the use of respective element and material types
  • Large deformation and plastic strains allowed in fire limit state design, but may hinder the overall fire performance of the compartment
slide17
Thermal analysis relating to structural response of building elements ignored or not properly considered

Structural Fire

Engineering Engineering

Gap

factors to consider for fire engineer structural engineer
Factors to consider for Fire Engineer & Structural Engineer

(a) The selected fire cases should be critically reviewed to ascertain if they generally

cover the worst scenario.

(b) The derivation of the fire load should be conversant with the local condition rather

than simply refer to overseas fire load data.

  • Some unprotected steel members might be subjected to a temperature close to the limiting temperature in case of fire. However, the structural design of the steel structure should take into account the stress reduction factor of steel at elevated temperature.
  • The derived surface temperature of the material subjected to elevated temperature has to account for the heat effects of thermal conductivity of materials, which may further raise the surface temperature.
  • The behaviour of natural fire set up of an open frame structure in the laboratory may be different from the real fire on the spot. In particular, the prevailing wind and other actual building layout, which may accelerate and increase the temperature of the structural material, have to be taken into consideration.
  • Calculation of fire resistance ratings, based on full compartment burn-out.
  • Development of suitable acceptance criteria for the design and use of timber, steel, concrete and glazing and their material limitation.
conclusion
Conclusion
  • Importance of other design parameters affecting the structural design in performance base approach to be observed
  • Design criteria should be incorporated in the coming Code of Practice (Fire Engineering Design)