decentralisation and centralisation contradictory or complementary n.
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
Decentralisation and Centralisation: Contradictory or Complementary

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 11

Decentralisation and Centralisation: Contradictory or Complementary - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 111 Views
  • Uploaded on

Decentralisation and Centralisation: Contradictory or Complementary. Colin Mair, Chief Executive, Improvement Service. Scope. The simple narrative Complications Directions of travel. The Simple Narrative: Looking Out. Very small number of very large councils

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Decentralisation and Centralisation: Contradictory or Complementary' - ros


Download Now An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
decentralisation and centralisation contradictory or complementary

Decentralisation and Centralisation: Contradictory or Complementary

Colin Mair, Chief Executive, Improvement Service

scope
Scope

The simple narrative

Complications

Directions of travel

the simple narrative looking out
The Simple Narrative: Looking Out

Very small number of very large councils

Lowest ratio of councillors and councils to population in Europe

Limited fiscal and constitutional empowerment

Low voter turnout: limited confidence

some comparisons
Some Comparisons

Norway: 19 counties and 434 municipalities (4,676,305)

Denmark: 98 municipalities and 5 ‘regions’ (5,515,575)

Finland: 20 ‘regions’ and 342 municipalities (5,255,068)

the simple narrative looking back
The Simple Narrative: Looking Back

Scotland 1974: 203 councils; diverse rather than uniform; 50% local taxation

Scotland 1996: 32 councils; uniformity of functions and empowerments; under 20% local taxation

Loss of major functions: public health; community health care; college sector; police and fire services

slide6
So….

Centralisation across 50 years: whole system

Loss of “localness” and closeness to communities

Systematic intergenerational inequalities: highly local

Reversing the trend: spatial; fiscal; cultural

slide7
But….

“Competencies” and “delegations”: rights, standards and decentralisation

Financial pressures: economies of scale and skill (note: fiscal powers = fiscal returns)

Outcomes and inequalities: national and local roles; culture and values

slide8

Government Finance and Demand

2009/10 – 2017/18 (% real terms)

NB. Projected cash cuts from 2016/17 – 2018/19

slide9
But….

“Competencies” and “delegations”: rights, standards and decentralisation

Financial pressures: economies of scale and skill (note: fiscal powers = fiscal returns)

Outcomes and inequalities: national and local roles; culture and values

challenges
Challenges

Form of decentralisation that enhances and does not limit rights

Intelligent aggregation/centralisation: protecting capacity and productivity to deliver to communities

Managing national and local contributions to outcomes: “community up”; “community in the round”

“What matters is what works”: Differential decentralisation

end points
End Points

“This could happen just now” but….

Political and executive culture….letting go

Empowerment and subsidiarity: “community up” but….

Beyond purely territorial focus: identity and interests