1 / 21

Dealing with the Past and Mediation

Dealing with the Past and Mediation. Schloss Hünigen, MSP/FDFA 19.3.09 Mô Bleeker Senior Advisor Dealing with the Past /genocide prevention, FDFA. Dealing with the Past (DwP) and Mediation: Challenges and Opportunity for a sustainable Peace!. Overview of presentation:.

ros
Download Presentation

Dealing with the Past and Mediation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Dealing with the Past and Mediation Schloss Hünigen, MSP/FDFA 19.3.09 Mô Bleeker Senior Advisor Dealing with the Past /genocide prevention, FDFA

  2. Dealing with the Past (DwP) and Mediation: Challenges and Opportunity for a sustainable Peace!

  3. Overview of presentation: • Importance of DwP • Conceptual framework of DwP • DwP in mediation process • Final remark

  4. 1. Importance of Dealing with the Past • establishment of facts / truth (vs. myths) • individualization of guilt (vs. collective guilt) • culture of accountability (vs. impunity) • restatement of the law (vs. anarchy) • restoring confidence and ownership (vs. mistrust and marginalization) • restoring dignity to victims and perpetrators (vs. victimization) • deterrence and prevention (vs. recurrence of violence)

  5. Danger of recurrence of violence after signing peace agreements: • Rwanda: The breakdown of the 1994 Arusha Accords in Rwanda was followed by a genocide of some 800,000 people.  ~ 50 times more deaths than had occurred in the 1990-1993 civil war • Angola: 350,000 dead after peace agreement • Liberia:150'000 dead after several peace agreements

  6. Overview of presentation: • Importance of DwP • Conceptual framework of DwP • DwP in mediation process • Final remark

  7. Reconciliation Rule of Law Right to justice Right to know • Individual penal prosecution • International tribunals • Domestic and "hybrid" courts • Witness protection • Trial monitoring • Truth commissions • Commissions of inquiry • Documentation • Archives • Exhumations conflict transformation conflict transformation Victims ex-combatant de victimes Citizen Citizen citoyen Guarantee of non-recurrence Right to reparation • Disarmament, demobilization, reintegration • Institutional reform • Democratical control of security institutions • Lustration/vetting • Rehabilitation, Compensation, Restitution • Memorials, public apologies, Commemorations, • Educational material No Impunity Guarantee of non-recurrence FDFA 2006, taken from the Joinet principles and SG report 2004

  8. The Right to Know: Knowledge of the truth and duty to remember

  9. The Right to Justice: Right to a fair remedy and duty to investigate and prosecute

  10. The Right to Reparation: Reparation on an individual level and collective forms of reparation

  11. The Gurantee of Non-Recurrence: Vetting/Lustration Institutional Reform

  12. Overview of presentation: • Importance of DwP • Conceptual framework of DwP • DwP in mediation process • Final remark

  13. 5 key points to remember for mediators: • Holistic approach and inter-linkages • Context-specific • Timing and sequencing • Inclusion and Ownership • Implementing, monitoring &evaluating

  14. Pre negotiation phase: Suggestion for mediators: • inform the negotiating parties that this is the agenda item that will address a range of accountability issues all along the process; • inform the negotiating parties about international legal norms which forbid blanket amnesties for war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide; • Rather than focusing exclusively on justice mechanisms, however, point out that a range of restorative measures exists to adress accountability.

  15. Negotiation phase: Suggestion for mediators: • ensure that dealing with the past issues are presented in a consistent and coherent way to the extent possible during the negotiation phase; • include - at a minimum - an agreement in principle on dealing with the past in the peace agreement and refer its implementation and details to an annex/commission/committee; • ensure that any mechanism created for dealing with the past has a clear mandate and provisions for implementation and monitoring

  16. Implementation phase: Suggestion for mediators: • verify that the previewed mechanisms are implemented in a transparent and accountable manner; • verify that the combination of short- and long-term goals is realistic and reinforces the whole peace process; • facilitate a dialogue among relevant stakeholders, including state and non-state actors regarding the decision-making and implementation of dealing with the past.

  17. Key challenges: • A commitment to justice for those who have committed international crimes and/or serious human rights violations; • A general commitment to end impunity may not be enough, specify as much as possible; • Amnesty regime that encompasses crimes of sedition and the like, and lesser offenses that do not constitute international crimes; • Prisoner exchange; • Human rights-based vetting mechanism for security forces; • Restitution, rehabilitation, reintegration and compensation programs for victims and survivors, commemorative efforts and reintegration programs for former combatants.

  18. Concrete example: Kosovo • Option 1: Government Liaison Office on Dealing with the Past (DWP) • Priority Issues: Missing Persons, Prosecution of War Crimes and Crimes against Humanity, Truth-seeking Mechanism, • Documentation, Victim Compensation, Amnesty for Non Prescriptive Acts, Vetting for Public Employees • Option 2: Independent Working Group in Kosovo on DWP • Priority Issues: Same as Option 1 • Option 3: Government Liaison Office and an Independent Working Group on DWP • Priority Issues: Same as Option 1 • Option 4: Independent Mechanisms on Specific DwP Issues • Priority Issues: Missing Persons, Prosecution of War Crimes and Crimes against Humanity, Non-Judicial Truth-Seeking Mechanism, Victim Compensation

  19. Overview of presentation: • Importance of DwP • Conceptual framework of DwP • DwP in mediation process • Final remark

  20. Final remark: The objectives of peace-building and the mechanisms of accountability work in complementary ways.

  21. Thank you for your attention!

More Related