LOGICAL FALLACIES. Common Mistakes in Weak Arguments. DEVELOPED BY JENIFFER VISCARRA. Definition. Logical fallacies are flaws in reasoning that lead to faulty, illogical statements. They are unreasonable argumentative tactics named for what has gone wrong during the reasoning process. .
Common Mistakes in Weak Arguments
DEVELOPED BY JENIFFER VISCARRA
Logical fallacies are flaws in reasoning that lead to faulty, illogical statements. They are unreasonable argumentative tactics named for what has gone wrong during the reasoning process.
Latin for to the man
Directly attacks someone’s appearance, personal habits, or character rather than focusing on the merit of the issue at hand. The implication is that if something is wrong with this person, whatever he/she says must be wrong.
How can you say he’s a good musician when he’s been in and out of rehab for three years?
Sara is divorced, so whatever relationship advice she gives you can’t be good.
It is the suggestions, not the person who makes them that deserve attention. Sara’s marital status has nothing to do with the quality of her advice. Isn’t it also possible that Sara could be married and give awful advice?
If my husband forgot to wash his dish, I would move out too. You did the right thing, Carol.
This category is for inductive fallacies, or faulty generalizations, arguments that improperly move from specific instances to general rules.
which means after this, therefore caused
This fallacy assumes that just because B
happened after A, it must have been caused
Politicians love this one.
Since Governor Bush took office, unemployment of minorities in the state has decreased by seven percent. Governor Bush should be applauded for reducing unemployment among minorities.
Before we pat the governor on the back, the speaker must show that Bush’s policies are responsible for the decrease in unemployment. It is not enough to show the decrease came after his election.
A hasty generalization is a conclusion based on insufficient or unrepresentative evidence.
Stereotyping and Sexism are forms of this fallacy. Take, for example common dumb blonde jokes:
Q: What do you call a blonde skeleton
in the closet?
A: Last year's hide-and-go-seek winner.
The only redheads I know are rude.
Therefore, all redheads must have bad
If the speaker only knows two redheads, then he has insufficient evidence to make the general claim about all people with that hair color.
An analogy points out similarities in things that are otherwise different. A false analogy claims comparison when differences outweigh similarities. Essentially, it’s comparing apples and oranges!
If we can put a man on the moon, why
can’t we find the cure for the common
While both things being compared here are related to science, there are more differences than similarities between space and biological advancements.
Fallacies of ambiguity appear to support their conclusions only due to their imprecise use of language. Once terms are clarified, fallacies of ambiguity are exposed. It is to avoid fallacies of this type that philosophers often carefully define their terms before launching into an argument.
A false dilemma asserts that a complex situation can have only two possible outcomes and that one of the options is necessary or preferable.
Either go to college or forget about making money.
This falsely implies that a college education is a pre-requisite for financial success.
Was it her college education that made Britney tons of money?
The arguer claims that there are only two options and one is unacceptable so we must accept the other. However in actuality there are other alternatives.
This is a kind of circular argument where the support only restates the claim.
Wrestling is dangerous because it is unsafe.
Jogging is fun because it is enjoyable.
Unsafe means the same thing as dangerous and fun means the same thing as enjoyable. This makes the reasoning circular.