1 / 38

Situational Criminology/Crime Prevention

Situational Criminology/Crime Prevention. Sam Poyser. Aims. What is situational criminology/crime prevention The case against traditional criminology & for situational criminology Routine Activities & Rational Choice theories explained Hot spots (briefly) & Hot products

romney
Download Presentation

Situational Criminology/Crime Prevention

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Situational Criminology/Crime Prevention Sam Poyser

  2. Aims • What is situational criminology/crime prevention • The case against traditional criminology & for situational criminology • Routine Activities & Rational Choice theories explained • Hot spots (briefly) & Hot products • SCP of child sexual abuse • Critique

  3. What is situational criminology/crime prevention? • Intervening in the causal chain to prevent crime from occurring

  4. Traditional Criminological concernsBrantingham & Brantingham (1991) • Crime has 4 determinants: the law, an offender, a target & a place • Classical perspective concerned primarily with the law, • Positivist criminology with the offender, • Leaves: target & the place (situational factors) • Traditional Criminology about trying to understand & explain crime and criminality • Looks at issues such as psychological & social disadvantage for example • Aims to help fashion a humane CJS – emphasises the need to reform criminals & deal with societal inequalities

  5. The case against traditional theorising • Criminological theories always provisional & incomplete • Impossible to achieve a ‘true’ understanding of crime - Focus on the causes of crime (e.g. poverty, etc) simply results in ‘utopian’ proposals for change • No evidence to show that deterrence through punishment has significant effect on crime rates • Treatment programmes to ‘change’ individual offenders are unproductive • Crime control through social reform not realistic/difficult to measure • Criminology needs to pay far more attention to practical utility and should be focused on helping to find ways to control crime (Clarke, 2004)

  6. The case for situational criminology/crime science • Much research indicates that crime can be immediately reduced by focusing on the reduction of situational opportunities (Clarke 1997) • Criminologists must be prepared to abandon theories unless they assist the mission of controlling crime • Criminology should help to find ways to tighten security & increase the risks of being caught. i.e. should be concerned with prevention & control • The more helpful theories are those that assist crime policy, such as:

  7. ‘Defensible space’ theory (or informal social control) • Newman (1973) - 3 factors increase crime in residential areas: • Anonymity (neighbours don’t know each other) • Lack of natural surveillance (easier to offend, unnoticed) • Many exits (easier to escape)

  8. Developed ‘defensible space’ model for a residential area that creates a physical environment inhibiting crime - 4 elements: • 1) Territoriality: • creation of a physical environment so that there are clear demarcations of a zone’s ownership - residents feel that they ‘own’ & belong to their building & thus can & should defend it • 2) Surveillance: • design of buildings to maximise the ability of inhabitants to observe their own territorial areas - can increase the no. of observers & the probability an offender would be seen

  9. ‘Defensible space’ theory (or informal social control)…continued • 3) Image: • design of an environment so that stigma is minimised • Offenders will be deterred or encouraged by visual cues from the space & its inhabitants – related to ‘Broken Windows’ Theory • 4) Safe zones: • the location of the building in respect to streets, parks, & other physical features of the neighbouring environment - barriers should be created between private, public, & semi-public space. This makes private space, defensible space.

  10. Example: Maximises the number of “eyes on the street” Reduces likelihood of offending as more chance of apprehension (& enhances feelings of security)

  11. The more helpful theories are those that assist crime policy: Routine Activities Theory • Routine Activities Theory: (Cohen & Felson, 1979: 589): • ‘Unlike many criminological enquiries, we do not examine why individuals or groups are inclined to criminality, but rather we take criminal inclinations as given & examine the manner in which spatio-temporal organisation of social activities helps to translate their criminal inclinations into action’ • For a crime to occur 3 elements must converge in time & space: • The presence of likely offenders • The presence of suitable targets • The absence of a capable guardian

  12. Routine Activities Theory • Increases in crime rates accompanied changing patterns of routine activities • Increased no. of working women & single households • More activities outside the home = more time away from the home • Large no.s of capable guardians removed - homes more vulnerable • Simultaneously, ‘consumer revolution’ = increasing no. of suitable targets - smaller, lighter, portable, valuable electronic goods • Crime increased not because of social decline but because of growing prosperity!

  13. The more helpful theories are those that assist crime policy: Rational Choice Theory • Emphasises the rationality & voluntary thought processes of offenders & decision-making processes behind whether or not to offend at any given time • Criminal = calculates dis/advantages associated with certain activities • Prevention is aimed at altering the decision making process to increase risk or effort of crime & decrease the rewards

  14. Rational Choice Theory • Decision to offend is: • - taken freely & actively - made in response to immediate circumstances in which offence is contemplated - based upon calculation of costs & benefits • Offenders act rationally in response to opportunities • So if opportunity can be removed, the level of crime can be reduced • We should take more account of specific situations where crimes are committed & of the thinking offenders might undertake

  15. Situational Crime Prevention - Cornish and Clarke (2003) - 5 Ways to Modify a Situation • Increasing the effort the offender must make to carry out the crime. • Increasing the risks the offender must face in completing the crime. • Reducing the rewards or benefits the offender expects to obtain from the crime. • Reducing or avoiding provocations that may tempt or incite offenders into criminal acts • Removing excuses that offenders may use to “rationalize” or justify their actions. • 'Twenty-five Techniques of Situational Crime Prevention’ by Cornish and Clarke (2003):

  16. Suitable targets: Hot spots & hot products • ‘Hot spots’ = places that have a high rate of reported crimes (Sherman et al., 1989) • Crime not spread evenly across all places, people or times - preventive measures must be directed to where crime is most concentrated. • E.g. Repeat victimisation - people/places that suffer a series of crimes in a relatively short period of time (Farrell and Pease, 1993). Helpful in focusing efforts to prevent burglary • Focusing on ‘hot spots’ & giving priority to ‘repeat victims’ of crime proved useful for crime reduction measures

  17. Suitable targets - Hot spots & hot products • ‘Hot products’ = consumer items that are most attractive to thieves. • Clarke (1999): we should focus policy & research on ‘hot products’ - suitable targets - valuable, small, portable consumer goods. • Ultimate hot product is cash - helps determine distribution of many kinds of theft, inc. commercial robberies, muggings, burglaries

  18. Hot products: Understanding, anticipating & reducing demand for stolen goods. Police Research Series Paper 112 • Review of the most stolen items for a variety of theft types: • For each kind of theft, specific items are consistently chosen by thieves • Residential burglaries: thieves most likely to pick jewellery, videos, cash, stereos, televisions • Shoplifting: items depend on the store - e.g. supermarkets likely to lose cigarettes, video tapes, beauty aids & non-prescription medicines • Certain items (inc. cigarettes, alcoholic drinks, fashion items) are at risk of being shoplifted wherever sold. • BCS: for thefts involving personal possessions, cash more frequently taken than anything else – followed by vehicle parts, clothing & tools.

  19. Relatively few hot products appear to account for a large proportion of all thefts. • Key attributes of hot products are summarised by CRAVED, - 6 elements making products attractive to thieves: • Concealable • Removable • Available • Valuable • Enjoyable • Disposable • This explains which products are stolen…but how much they are stolen may depend on 1 attribute: ease of disposal

  20. Wortley & Smallbone (2006): Apply a SCP model to sexual offences against children • Explanations of sexual offending against children: offenders are traditionally portrayed as internally driven to offend • SCP approach examines the immediate external setting to identify factors that permit or encourage abuse • Evidence suggests that sex offences against children are very much mediated by opportunities & other environmental conditions • Need to systematically identify & alter these problematic environmental elements

  21. Wortley & Smallbone (2006) • Interviewed 323 convicted sex offenders • Found that immediate environmental factors were very important in decision to offend in many cases • E.g. the mean age for onset of offending was 32 years old – early 30s is an age when many men are assuming child care/other supervisory roles with children – opportunity to offend is very much increased

  22. Wortley & Smallbone (2006) Locations for finding a child (extra-familial): • Domestic settings were most popular: • Over 50% accessed victims through: a friend’s home, through baby-sitting, at offender’s block of flats or place of employment • (Domestic setting most common place to access victims/commit crime but difficult to access re: SCP) • But public sphere was also important: • A public toilet (13%), a shopping centre, park, swimming pool or church (11%), a playground (5%), an amusement arcade (4%) and at the Cinema (3%) • Public settings offer the greatest potential – e.g. through design of public toilets, extending guardianship, controlling access,

  23. Scenario • Abuser goes to a shopping centre to watch young children – a young girl seems to be alone (opportunity) • Decision to offend will be based on presence/absence of situational risk factors such as whether: • The child is really alone or temporarily separated from guardian • The child’s guardian is actively searching for them & may return at any moment • Offender is surrounded by a crowd who could be alerted by the child’s cries • Offender notices surveillance cameras & fears being caught on tape • Shopping centre is regularly patrolled by security officers • More likely to offend if child is alone & unsupervised by a guardian, near an exit, without any potential witnesses & there’s an absence of cameras & security officers • So a cost-benefit analysis is made • Such considerations only help re: ‘stranger-danger cases’, but are still worthy of attention

  24. Situational crime prevention of rape?...of corporate crime? • http://www4.gu.edu.au:8080/adt-root/uploads/approved/adt-QGU20090623.115822/public/02Whole.pdf - Murray, M. (2007) • Some very interesting findings • Re-imagining crime prevention: controlling corporate crime? • Anne Alvesalo, Steve Tombs, Erja Virta and Dave Whyte (2006)

  25. The case against situational criminology • Situational criminology was developed primarily by the Home Office in late 70s – Administrative criminology - ‘Administrative’ refers to the politically pragmatic nature of this work. • A managerial solution to crime - “…content to manage the problem & keep it from overwhelming the forces of law & order” (Clarke, 2005: 57) • There are many reasons why people might commit crime, some which may override free will & rationality • Sometimes the risk itself may be an attraction, e.g. joyriding, drug taking, etc – scp has less to say about crimes that may evoke some expressive dimension

  26. The case against situational criminology • Issues of privacy, civil liberties & human rights - particularly the emphasis on surveillance (we are the most heavily ‘watched’ and ‘monitored’ countries in the world) – fears that we have "sleep-walked into a surveillance society" • There are up to 4.2m CCTV cameras in Britain - about one for every 14 people. • Emphasis on environment-centred techniques of ‘target hardening’ may accelerate community segregation/social exclusion • Fragments society – outsiders seen as potential offenders, not innocent visitors? - increases fear/culture of mistrust/suspicion? • Surrounding people with security technologies may increase fear – ‘outside’ is dangerous: • “Once people retreat into the private sphere of the ‘fortress family’ or…the ‘defended enclosure’ the world beyond becomes firmly cast as the source…of danger” (Loader, 1997, p. 157) – do we want to live in gated communities? (Atkinson et al, 2004)

  27. The case against situational criminology • Emphasis on target hardening has encouraged government policy which ignores the conditions which give rise to crime (Young, 1994). • Measures focus not on the causes of crime, but the control of the opportunities to commit crime – how far do we want to control our environment? • Giddens (1991) in the name of trying to control crime ‘risks’ we have seen the emergence of an ‘engineered society’ – technologically-based social-control (Gary Marx, 1995) • Are these measures always used to protect us? Are there other reasons for using them?: ‘Security means safety; safety means shoppers; & shoppers means profits. . .’ (Beck & Willis, 1995: 232). • Not a ‘once and for all cure all’ – must be sustained even when the problem appears to have been solved & often need to be adjusted in response to criminal adaptations

  28. Displacement • SCP measures may lead to crimes being displaced • Reppetto (1976) identified 5 forms of displacement: • Temporal - The crime is committed…at a different time • Tactical – …using a different method • Territorial – …in a different area • Target – …against a different target • Functional – A different type of crime is committed • Barr & Pease (1990) - 6th category: • Perpetrator displacement – Prevented crimes are committed by different offenders

  29. Displacement • Consequences of preventing prostitution in residential area: • - some may move area – territorial • - some may use massage parlours, cards in phone booths – tactical • - some may operate at times least problematic - temporal • - some may turn to other crimes e.g. shoplifting – functional • - some may give up – i.e. not commit the crime – go & get a legitimate job

  30. Displacement • Those who accept displacement might occur, argue - since not ALL crime is displaced, some benefit exists • Displacement may well lead to crimes being committed elsewhere but if these are lesser crimes (benign displacement) then ok? • Displacement is positive as long as “the deflected crime causes less harm & misery than the original crime” (Pease, 1997, p978) • But some evidence of malign displacement – frustrated shoplifter may decide to rob the store

  31. Diffusion of benefits • Sometimes the reverse of displacement can occur • Rather than crime being exported to other times/places benefits can spread beyond the intended area/target – Felson & Clarke (1999) found: • When CCTV cameras were introduced to monitor 3 car parks at Surrey Uni, crime declined not only in these but also in another that did not have CCTV • When CCTV cameras were put into 5 double-decker buses (out of a fleet of 80 in North England), vandalism by school kids dropped for the whole fleet • Potential offenders may be aware that new prevention measures have been introduced but are often unsure of their precise scope – short-term benefit?

  32. Durkheim (1895) - argued for the ‘normality’ of crime & deviance & for limits to crime control in the ‘good society’ • …so an orderly, conforming, highly controlled, highly regulated society is not necessarily a ‘healthy’ society?

  33. References • Cohen, L. and Felson, M. (1979) ‘Social Change and crime rate trends: a routine activity approach’, American Sociological Review 44: 588-608 • Clarke, R. and Felson, M. (1993) Routine activity and rational choice. New Brunswick: Transaction • Clarke, R. (1999) Hot products: Understanding, anticipating and reducing demand for stolen goods. Police Research Series Paper 112. London: Home Office • Clarke, R. (2004) ‘Technology, Criminology and Crime Science’, European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 10: 55 - 63 • Crawford, 1998 • Gilling, D. (1997) Crime Prevention: Theory, policy and politics, London: UCL Press • Hughes, G. (2002) Understanding crime prevention: Social control, risk and late modernity, Buckingham: Open University Press. • Wortley, R & Smallbone, S. (2006). Applying situationa pricipals to sexual offences against children. In Wortley & Smallbone. (Eds). Situational prevention of child sexual abuse. Devon: Willan • Young, J. (1994) ‘Incessant Chatter: Recent Paradigms in Criminology, in M. Maguire, R. Morgan and R. Reiner (eds), Oxford Handbook of Criminology (1st edn). Oxford: Clarenden Press

  34. Take a walk on campus and identify some places/areas that might benefit from situational crime prevention • Identify/devise some low-cost situational crime prevention methods that would make your halls of residence/house more secure

More Related