1 / 15

Second International FTA Seville Seminar September 2006

CAN ONLINE SOCIAL NETWORKS BE USED IN FORWARD-LOOKING STUDIES? O. Da Costa, R. Cachia, R. Compañó Institute for Prospective and Technological Studies Joint Research Centre / European Commission E-41092 SEVILLA. Second International FTA Seville Seminar September 2006. Overview.

Download Presentation

Second International FTA Seville Seminar September 2006

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. CAN ONLINE SOCIAL NETWORKS BE USED IN FORWARD-LOOKING STUDIES?O. Da Costa, R. Cachia, R. CompañóInstitute for Prospective and Technological StudiesJoint Research Centre / European CommissionE-41092 SEVILLA Second International FTA Seville Seminar September 2006

  2. Overview • Online Social Networks (OSN): • A new social phenomenon • A new communication tool • OSN for detecting changing social patterns • OSN Communities on Foresight • Assets & Limitation A graph showing typical network of friends in Orkut compiled by Orkut2dot

  3. What are online social networks (OSN)? • OSN is a group that primarily interacts via the internet. • As online communities, they are self-organised electronic networks organised around a shared interest or purpose [Rheingold, 1993]. • Significant socio-technical change has resulted from the proliferation of OSNs. Figure by J. Layton Networking by chain effect: « friends » connect with « friends-of-friends » who connect with « friends-of-friends-of-friends »

  4. Member’s Profile Networking « Friends » Tools for Network communication Communitiesof interest OSNs: Characteristics Example: Orkut

  5. Orkut: An OSN Case Study • Philosophy: • Organically growing network of trusted “friends“ • Membership by invitation-only • Features - members can: • introduce profiles (photo, hobbies, academic data, etc.) • join discussions or create their own • “rank” and write testimonials about others • Exponential Growth: • Jan 2004 created • Feb 2004: 100 000 • July 2004: 1.000.000 • Apr 2005: 5.000.000 • Jan 2006: 12.000.000 • Sep 2006: 29.000.000

  6. OSN: Members Age Structure Member are mostly young people in the18-25 age bracket with quite a gender balance. • Are they a representative selection of group who will be the “shakers and movers” in 20 years from now? • Do OSN reveal novel patterns amongst youngsters that may persist in a wider social scale? • Can we detect already: future change in social patterns or future visions (networked society)? Orkut Feb 2006

  7. OSN: A reflection of new social patterns? • Contacting, communicating and keeping in touch • Novel spaces for communicating and interaction • Difficulties in making yourself heard due to information overload • Changing Relations • Roles of media? • Collective collaboration • Networking across geographical locations • Influencing power?

  8. How to detect signals of change? • Systematic screening networks needed. Possible selection criteria • Size of networks • Level of activity • Area of activity • Data-mining of relational databases

  9. OSN: Assets • Relatively high motivation for voluntary Contribution • Anticipated Reciprocity, Increased Reputation, Sense of efficacy, Communication* and Mutual trust) • Cost • Relatively low with respect to alternative communication tools • Flexibility • New communities can be created any time • No geographical bounders * The Economies of Online Cooperation: Gifts and Public Goods in Cyberspace, 1999, Peter Kollock

  10. OSN: Some Limitations • Automatic screening procedure difficult: • Large networks • Data may be incoherent, contradictory, incomplete or non-codified • Role of coordinator is limited • Intrinsic time delay (people to not respond immediately) and an "open-ended character". • Profiles may not always be reliable • Privacy concerns • Spamming and bugging might influence results • Geographical bias (66.3% of Orkut members from Brasil)

  11. Join our OSN Foresight Community ! “Foresight & Future Studies”, Orkut, www.orkut.com/Community.aspx?cmm=143886 • Disclaimer: the authors have no relation or interest in the social network application selected for this undertaking.

  12. Other online tools with potential for Foresight

  13. Growth of Online Social Networks • Orkut • MySpace • Flickr • YouTube

  14. Input question Get answers 25 393 answers Vote for best answers

  15. Conclusion • OSN • New social phenomenon • Powerful large-scale communication tool • Currently being researched for marketing, investigation in social sciences and other • Objective of this presentation • Initiate debate about the potential of OSN in forward-looking studies • Further work required • In-depth investigation of limits, advantages and drawbacks • A tested research framework, which could be used as an analytical tool to conduct forward-looking studies • Various research methodologies and complementary approaches should be taken into consideration • Too early for assessing their potential, but prospects appear promising

More Related