1 / 11

Determination of R – matrix

Determination of R – matrix. Supervisors : Prof. Nikos Tsoupas Prof. Manolis Benis Sándor Kovács Murat Yavuz Alkmini-Vasiliki Dagli. Abstract. In our work we calculated the transformation matrix of a linear charged particle optics element .

Download Presentation

Determination of R – matrix

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Determination of R – matrix Supervisors: Prof. NikosTsoupas Prof. ManolisBenis Sándor Kovács MuratYavuz Alkmini-VasilikiDagli

  2. Abstract • Inourworkwecalculatedthetransformation matrix of a linearchargedparticleopticselement. • y coordinates and theelevationanglesatthefinalpositionwereanalysedrelatedtoinitialcondition • Linearity of thechoseneinzellenswas tested • R-matrixwas tested forarbitraryinitialconditions

  3. Theory • R-matrixis a transformation matrix (rotationmatrix), whichtransportsabeam of particlesfromtheentrance of theelectrostatic (ormagnetostatic) elementtotheexit. • Transportmatrixcan be determinedinanycase of lineardevices. R-matrix is a numericalmodel of an opticalelement

  4. Einzellens • An einzel lens is a charged particle lens that focuses without changing the energy of the beam. It consists of three or more sets of cylindrical or rectangular tubes in series along an axis. It is used in ion opticsto focus ions in flight which is accomplished through manipulation of the electric field in the path of the ions.

  5. Parameters • Inthesimulationsweuseda simionexample(examples/einzel.iob) • Fixed parameters: • geometricalparameters of thelens • energy of theelectrons (50eV) • initialplane of theelectrons (x=-50mm) • datarecordingplaneafterparticlespassesthroughthedevice (x=140mm) • Potentialonelectrode 2 (V2=110V) • Variableparameters: • Initial y coordinates • Elevationangle

  6. Calculations Fromthepreviousequations: Ifweset=0° and y0>0mm then R11 and R21can be calculated. If we sety0=0 then>0°R12and R22can be calculated.

  7. We chosethevariables: y0 = 1 mm; 0= 0° Thenwegot a log file withthevalues: X(-50 mm) Y(1 mm) Elv(0 deg) X(140 mm) Y(0.0515507 mm) Elv(-0.554364 deg) UsingthepreviousequationsR11 = 0,051551 and R21= -0,554364 werecalculated. Changingthepreviousvariablesas: y0 = 0 mm; 0 = 1° X(-50 mm) Y(0 mm) Elv(1 deg) X(140 mm) Y(1.81902 mm) Elv(0.079828 deg) Followingthesamemethodwecalculated R12= 1,819020 and R22 = 0,079828.

  8. Finallythetransformation matrix (R) is found: Accordingtothetheory: det R = 1 Inordertoconfirmthevalidity of our R – matrixwehavetocalculatethedeterminant of it: det R = R11· R22 - R12 · R21 = 1,012514 ≈ 1 The calculatedR-matrixelementswere tested severaltimeswitharbitrary input parametersintherange of min=-5° tomax=5° and y0 min=-1 to y0 max=1.

  9. Conclusions • The difference from the theoretical value (det R = 1) is 1,25%! • The reason of thiserror is thatthereshould be higherorderaberrations. • Thisfirstorderapproximation is validonlyunder 1° elevationangle. • Linearitywascheckedatseveral y coordinatesinsidethelens and maximum deviationfromtheparaxialaxiswassmallerthan 10% of thelensradius. • Electrostaticlensesareverysensitivetoaberrations.

  10. Thankyouforyourattention!

More Related