massive fluid resuscitation l.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Massive Fluid Resuscitation PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Massive Fluid Resuscitation

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 60

Massive Fluid Resuscitation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 390 Views
  • Uploaded on

Massive Fluid Resuscitation. D. John Doyle MD PhD FRCPC Cleveland Clinic Foundation March 2003. Outline. Clinical Need for Massive Fluid Resuscitation What to Fluids to Give? When to Give Colloids When to Give Blood Products Things to Look Out For Avoiding Overzealous Resuscitation

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Massive Fluid Resuscitation' - rob


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
massive fluid resuscitation

Massive Fluid Resuscitation

D. John Doyle MD PhD FRCPC

Cleveland Clinic Foundation

March 2003

outline
Outline
  • Clinical Need for Massive Fluid Resuscitation
  • What to Fluids to Give?
  • When to Give Colloids
  • When to Give Blood Products
  • Things to Look Out For
  • Avoiding Overzealous Resuscitation
  • Limits to Hydroxyethyl Starch Administration
what is massive fluid resuscitation
What is Massive Fluid Resuscitation?
  • No strict definition
  • Over 10 liters of crystalloid / colloid (?)
  • Usually involves an unstable patient
  • May involve massive transfusion
what is a massive transfusion
What is a Massive Transfusion?

Massive transfusion is the replacement of more than one blood volume (about 65 ml/kg) with blood components within several hours. (Some authors say 10 units of blood in under 24 hours).

clinical need for massive fluid resuscitation
Clinical Need for Massive Fluid Resuscitation
  • Massive Trauma / Crush Injuries
  • Ruptured AAA
  • Liver Transplantation
  • Cardiac Redo Cases That Go Sour
  • Spinal Correction Surgery
  • Surgical Misadventure (eg, IVC tear)
slide6

Some Sources of Massive Blood Loss

from www.trauma.org (trauma image bank)

Car Accidents

Earthquakes

Penetrating Trauma

slide7

Penetrating Trauma

from www.trauma.org (trauma image bank)

28 yr old male, motorcycle collision, fall over pieces of wood. The patient was haemodynamically normal, conscious, just demanding the removal of the stick. Nevertheless, he was submitted to an emergent left thoracotomy, and left laparotomy. The piece of wood was just located behind the sternum and in front of the heart with no major vascular or cardiac injury found, only a perforation of the diaphragm. Intraabdominally, the piece passed between the left lobe of the liver and the spleen with no further injury. We found this almost unbelievable! Source: Luis Filipe Pinheiro, Viseu, Portugal

slide8

from www.trauma.org (trauma image bank)

Widened Mediastinum from Aortic Tear

physiologic response to volume loss
Physiologic Response to Volume Loss
  • 15% loss - tachycardia to maintain cardiac output in the face of a reduction in stroke volume, orthostatic hypotension
  • 30% - tachycardia, tachypnea, decreased pulse pressure, hypotension, mental changes
  • 30-40% (1500-2000 cc) - tachycardia, tachypnea, mental changes, narrow pulse pressure, moderately severe hypotension
  • Over 40% volume loss - life-threatening, clammy extremities, pallor, thready pulse, severe hypotension, unresponsiveness, decreased or absent urine output
slide10

The following chart outlines the classes of shock, their presenting signs and symptoms, and the guidelines for resuscitation. These are guidelines only. The amount of blood lost is estimate only as a starting point for resuscitation. Clinical parameters must guide the response to therapy. Estimated Fluid and Blood Requirements in Shock (Based on Patient's Initial Presentation) Emergency War Surgery NATO Handbook: Part II: Response of the Body to Wounding: Chapter IX: Shock and Resuscitation

what fluids to give
What Fluids to Give?
  • Crystalloids [start with crystalloids]
    • Ringers
    • Saline
    • Special crystalloids
  • Colloids [rule of thumb: start colloids at 15 - 20% blood volume loss]
    • Blood Products
    • Albumin
    • Pentaspan
    • Special colloids
where the iv fluid goes
Where the IV fluid goes
  • Colloids

Albumin, HES

  • Almost 100 %Intravascular/ Plasma Volume

Crystalloids

NS, RL

75 % Extravascular

25 % Intravascular/

Plasma Volume

rule of thumb start colloids at 15 20 blood volume loss
Rule of thumb: Start Colloids at 15 - 20% Blood Volume Loss

Example (20% blood loss rule of thumb)

  • 77 kg man
  • Blood volume estimated at 65 ml/kg x 77 kg = 5 liters
  • 20% blood volume = 1 liter of blood
  • Crystalloid replacement for 1 liter blood is 3-4 liters
  • Thus, consider starting a colloid after 3-4 liters of crystalloid given to replace lost blood
colloids
Colloids
  • Human serum albumin (5 and 25%)
  • Fresh frozen and stored plasma
  • HMW hydroxyethyl starch
  • LMW hydroxyethyl starch
  • Dextrans
  • Gelatins
advantages of colloids
Advantages of Colloids
  • Less edema
  • Less volume administered
  • Less thermal load effect for given level of plasma volume expansion
  • Volume administer stays in intravascular space longer
concerns with colloids
Concerns with Colloids
  • Decreased hemoglobin
  • Dilution of plasma proteins (Dextrans, HES)
  • Dilution of coagulation factors (PT, PTT)
  • Pulmonary edema
  • Allergic reaction
artificial colloid solutions
Artificial Colloid Solutions
  • Hydroxyethyl Starches (HESs)
    • LMW (Pentraspan, PentaLyte)
    • HMW (Hespan,Hextend)
  • Dextrans
  • Gelatins

Artificial colloids, unlike crystalloids, are complex entities that undergo a regulatory approval process similar to that for a drug.

human serum albumin
Human Serum Albumin
  • Most abundant protein in the plasma
  • MW 69,000 daltons
  • Prepared from human donor plasma in isotonic saline
  • Source of unending controversy
dextrans
Dextrans
  • Linear polysaccharides produced from sucrose by Leuconostoc Mesenteroides bacterium
  • Much less common use today
  • Two main forms
    • Dextran 70 (MWw 70K)
    • Dextran 40 (MWw 40K)
hespan 6 hydroxyethyl starch
Hespan (6 % Hydroxyethyl Starch)
  • Available as 6% solution in normal saline w/ osmolarity of 310 mOsm/l;
  • Plasma volume expansion for more than 24 hrs
  • Like Dextran, can be associated w/ urticarial & anaphylactoid reactions
  • Half life for 90% of particles is 17 days, whereas that of remaining 10% is 48 days
  • Dosage: - usually 500-1000ml (do not usually exceed 1500ml/day) IV at a rate not to exeed 20ml/kg/hr;); -
  • Precautions: - Not a substitute for blood or plasma; - Contraindicated in patients with severe bleeding disorders, severe CHF, or renal failure with oliguria or anuria;
hespan and heparin mix ups
Hespan and Heparin mix-ups

Problem: A fatal error occurred when a nurse mistakenly selected and administered two heparin 25,000 unit per 500 mL premixed bags instead of HESPAN (hetastarch) for a patient who was actively bleeding. Such mix-ups have been reported on several occasions to USP, ISMP and FDA. Although this is primarily a nomenclature issue (both names include the characters h-e-p-a and n in the same sequence), the drugs are also found in similar IV bags with blue and red labeling. Since Hespan may be used in patients who are actively bleeding, the danger of inadvertent heparin administration is obvious.

Recommendation: Since hetastarch is now manufactured generically by other companies, consider using an alternate to Hespan and refer to hetastarch products by generic name. If Hespan remains in stock, do not store alphabetically next to premixed heparin products. Label products, storage bins, and automated dispensing machine pockets with a reminder about error potential. ISMP has communicated with FDA and the manufacturer about this serious problem.

http://www.ismp.org/MSAarticles/A4Q99Action.html

slide22

Hextend (6 % Hydroxyethyl Starch)

From: Wilkes: Anesth Analg, Volume 94(3).March 2002.538-544

hes pentaspan
HES - Pentaspan
  • Synthetic plasma volume expander
  • Average MW 200,000 – 300,000 daltons
  • Plasma volume expansion exceeds volume of Pentaspan infused – lasting 18-24 h
  • 12-24 h improvement in hemodynamic status
  • 70% excreted in the urine in 24 hr
  • Metabolised by serum amylases
massive fluid resuscitation sources of trouble
Massive Fluid Resuscitation: Sources of Trouble
  • Not enough experience (lack of proactive management)
  • Not enough help
  • Not enough lines
  • Not enough fluid warmers
  • Not monitoring coagulation
massive fluid resuscitation things to look out for
Massive Fluid Resuscitation: Things to Look Out For
  • Hypothermia
  • Hypocalcemia and hypomagnesemia
  • Coagulopathy
  • Acidosis
  • Severe anemia
  • Airway edema
predicting life threatening coagulopathy in the massively transfused trauma patient
Predicting Life-Threatening Coagulopathy in the Massively Transfused Trauma Patient

Cosgriff N, Moore EE, Sauaia A, Kenny-Moynihan M, Burch JM, Galloway B Predicting life-threatening coagulopathy in the massively transfused trauma patient: hypothermia and acidoses revisited. J Trauma 1997 May;42(5):857-61;

Postinjury life-threatening coagulopathy in the seriously injured requiring massive transfusion is predicted by persistent hypothermia and progressive metabolic acidosis.

what mechanisms lead to coagulopathy in massive transfusions
What Mechanisms Lead to Coagulopathy in Massive Transfusions?

Coagulation defects develop primarily from dilution of protein coagulation factors and platelets when crystalloid, colloid and red blood cells are used to replace lost volume.

Hypothermia frequently also plays a role.

massive fluid resuscitation using p lasma poor red cells
Massive Fluid Resuscitation Using Plasma-Poor Red Cells

“Hypofibrinogenemia develops first followed by other coagulation factor deficits and later by thrombocytopenia. Therefore the use of fresh frozen plasma (FFP) is the primary intervention to treat abnormal bleeding encountered in the replacement of massive blood loss with plasma-poor red cells.”

Replacement of massive blood loss.Hiippala S. Vox Sang 1998;74 Suppl 2:399-407 

characteristics of coagulopathy with massive transfusions
Characteristics of Coagulopathy with Massive Transfusions

Coagulopathy associated with massive transfusion is characterized clinically by microvascular bleeding or oozing from the mucosa, wound and puncture sites.

Surgeons will complain that clot formation ins impaired.

how should coagulopathy from massive transfusions ideally be treated
How Should Coagulopathy From Massive Transfusions Ideally be Treated?

Empirical formulas using ratios of various components to volume administered are often inadequate to appropriately treat or prevent coagulopathy of massive transfusion.

Treatment should include restoration of systemic perfusion, maintenance of normal temperature and blood component therapy supported by laboratory tests.

consequences of using plasma poor red cells
Consequences of Using Plasma-Poor Red Cells
  • Plasma-poor red cells are now commonly used instead of whole blood or packed red blood cells to supply hemoglobin during blood loss.
  • Since the plasma content of plasma-poor red cells is rather small, a deficit of plasma and coagulation factors develops earlier than during transfusion of whole blood or packed red blood cells .
when to give blood products
When to Give Blood Products
  • Rules for homologous packed cells
  • Rules for autologous whole blood
  • Rules for plasma, FFP
  • Rules for platelets
  • Rules for cryoprecipitate
  • Rules for albumin
  • Rules for synthetic blood (investigational)
platelets
Platelets
  • In patients with thrombocytopenia, the risk of hemorrhage increases progressively once the platelet count drops below 100,000/µL.
  • With normally functioning platelets, most major surgery can be safely performed if the count remains within the range of 50,000-75,000/µL.
are prophylactic platelets and ffp indicated in massive transfusion
Are Prophylactic Platelets and FFP Indicated in Massive Transfusion?

“Platelets should not be routinely administered during massive transfusion. While thrombocytopenia may develop in massively transfused patients, administration of platelets should be reserved for the patient exhibiting microvascular bleeding and a platelet count less than 50 x 109/L. Platelet transfusion may be necessary for patients with intermediate platelet counts (50-100 x 109/L) if it is determined the risk for more bleeding is significant.”

[http://www.asahq.org/ProfInfo/Transfusion/Massive.html]

are prophylactic platelets and ffp indicated in massive transfusion36
Are Prophylactic Platelets and FFP Indicated in Massive Transfusion?

“As the development of thrombocytopenia is a highly individual phenomenon, the transfusion of platelets should be guided by repeatedly determined platelet counts.”

Replacement of massive blood loss.Hiippala S. Vox Sang 1998;74 Suppl 2:399-407 

clotting factors
Clotting Factors
  • Blood normally contains a relative abundance of each clotting factor and hemorrhage is a rare occurrence unless any one of these factors is reduced to less than 50% of normal.
  • Deficiency of a single factor is usually the result of an inherited coagulation deficiency disorder.
  • Acquired coagulation disorders are usually the result of multiple factor deficiencies.
slide38

Are Prophylactic Platelets and FFP Indicated in Massive Transfusion?

“FFP also should not be administered prophylactically for massive transfusion. In the massively transfused patient, clinical bleeding associated with coagulation factor deficiencies is unlikely until factor levels fall below 20 percent of normal. In the clinical setting, this usually does not occur until greater than one blood volume has been replaced and the PT and PTT are less than 1.5 times control values. In the event the PT and PTT cannot be obtained in a timely fashion, FFP may be administered for correction of microvascular bleeding in patients transfused with more than one blood volume.”

[http://www.asahq.org/ProfInfo/Transfusion/Massive.html]

another viewpoint on massive blood transfusions
Another Viewpoint on Massive Blood Transfusions

“In the past, prophylactic fresh-frozen plasma (FFP) and platelets transfusion has been said to have no place. However, relying on a specific biological diagnosis of the hemostatic defect is an unrealistic view in high bleeding rate situations.”

“Considering the time scale for laboratory screening and blood components availability, the use of FFP is advocated as soon as one blood volume has been replaced.”

“ If platelet counts and units may be more easily obtained, platelets transfusion may be guided by repeatedly determined platelet counts.”

Massive blood transfusion, blood volume expansion and hemostasisHématologie. Vol. 6, Issue 3, May - June 2000: 191-7, Reviewshttp://www.john-libbey-eurotext.fr/articles/hma/6/3/191-7/en-resum.htm

how should coagulation be monitored during massive transfusion
How Should Coagulation be Monitored During Massive Transfusion?

Routine coagulation tests that evaluate protein coagulant activity, ( PT, PTT, INR and thrombin time), do not reliably predict perioperative bleeding, but they help identify patients with deficiencies of coagulation factors. Standard laboratory tests along with platelet count and fibrinogen level should guide the use of component therapy.Bleeding time is not predictive of perioperative bleeding and is rarely accessible in the operating room setting. The activated clotting time (ACT) is influenced by both hypofibrinogenemia and coagulation factor deficiencies, and this lack of specificity limits ACT as a useful test during massive transfusion.

[Modified from http://www.asahq.org/ProfInfo/Transfusion/Massive.html]

slide41

How Should Coagulation be Monitored During Massive Transfusion?

Whole blood clotting analysis, as seen with the Thromboelastograph® (TEG) and Sonoclot®, provides a dynamic picture of the entire clotting process.

Both the TEG and Sonoclot® measure the viscoelastic properties of blood. These tests evaluate the development of a blood clot from the initial fibrin strands to eventual clot retraction or lysis.

The usefulness of TEG or Sonoclot® during massive transfusion has not been established.

[http://www.asahq.org/ProfInfo/Transfusion/Massive.html]

hes and massive blood transfusions
HES and Massive Blood Transfusions

“Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) solutions are frequently used and differ in their pharmacological properties.”

“An acquired von Willebrand syndrome may result from the infusion of high molecular weight (MW) or of large volumes of medium MW HES solutions.”

“HES solutions infusions should be restricted according to recommended dose limits.”

Massive blood transfusion, blood volume expansion and hemostasisHématologie. Vol. 6, Issue 3, May - June 2000: 191-7, Reviewshttp://www.john-libbey-eurotext.fr/articles/hma/6/3/191-7/en-resum.htm

example disastrous liver transplant
Example: Disastrous Liver Transplant
  • Preexisting coagulopathy
  • “Bad feeling” about outcome
  • 5 IVs to start, 2 more (femorals) started during the case
  • 142 units packed cells
  • Arrived in ICU alive, but died soon after
slide44

MEGA TRANSFUSION FOR LIVER TRANSPLANTATION(Posting to GASNet Anesthesiology Discussion Group)

D. John Doyle

Two weeks ago my resident and I (with help from nurses and others) gave the following blood products in the on-going resuscitation of a patient undergoing an eleven hour liver transplant: - 142 units of packed cells - 61 units of fresh frozen plasma - 15 liters of 5% albuminAs well, cryoprecipitate and platelets were given, along with about 25 liters of crystalloid. We had seven IVs, of which four were warmed. All blood bags were pressurized to 400 mmHg with a wrap-around bag system. The hemoglobin concentration on arrival (alive!) in the surgical ICU was 11.3 g/dl. This may be something of a record. Does anyone know of similar stories either from the literature or from personal experience?

slide45

Reply 1You were just getting warmed up! I personally assisted in getting500 donor units in the room for one patient, and I have been told bya reliable source whose name you would recognize that over 1000 unitshave been used in a single case. Both of these were some years ago,and it is my impression that the overall situation is now muchimproved. The case I knew of personally did not survive to leave theoperating room. It might be hard to get data on the actual records,as those who know about them might not want to confess. I am nowsomewhat out of touch with this, as I have not done livers myself forthe past 11.5 years.

slide46

Reply 2Bravo! I have given 195 packed red cells for a livertransplant, but we were using a rapid infusion system. Thereservoir filter got clogged and we had to replace it duringongoing blood loss. Not fun. I guess you now have powerfullydeveloped forearms from pumping up those bags.

slide47

Reply 3My experience with these mega transfusions for livertransplants (> 100 units) is that although they usuallyarrive in the ICU, they usually do not leave the hospitalalive. I wonder if we shouldn't have the surgeons pack thewound after a fixed amount of blood is given, (and the liverseems to be adequately sutured in place), and then return thepatient to the OR on the next day if the patient is stillalive. The amount of blood wasted seems a shame.

slide48

Reply 4Your message prompted several questions, which I hope willstimulate discussion: 1) is the patient still alive?; 2) if not,was the expenditure of such expensive resources worth it?;3)if so, does it appear s/he's going to make it?; 4) is livertransplantation something we should be doing, something weshould be investing such resources in?Thoughts, everyone.

slide49

Reply 5 - Response to Replies 1-4More on Megatransfusions in Liver TransplantationIn response to discussion on the above topic, I am providing the additional information about my mega-transfusion case (142 units of packed cells).Yes, the patient died (no suprise), but he lasted over 48 hours in the ICU with increasingly more aggressive inotropic support (dopamine +epinephrine +levophed), continuing replacement of blood losses, and even high-frequency jet ventilation on and off. He gained about 50 kg (preop under 100kg; 150 kg at death) from third spacing.

slide50

Reply 5 - Continued

We did not use a rapid infusor as (eg, Level One), but avoided hand pumping by using a air regulator system set at a pressure of 400 mmHg hooked up to four or more "wrap around" pressure bags with velcro tabs. All blood was filtered to avoid clogging the filters in the blood sets; filters were changed after 3 or so bags (otherwise the filter resistance would be too high). Despite four blood warmers, a heated humidifier, two forced air heaters and a very warm OR, nasopharyngeal temperature was only 32.2 Celsius at the time of unclamping. (We have seen V Fib on unclamping with colder temperatures)We used the QT interval to "monitor" calcium levels. Despite giving calcium periodically,at one point the ionized calcium was 10% of the lower limit of normal! (At that point we drew up 6 g of CaCl2 in a 60cc syringe and gave it over about 30 minutes.)

slide51

Reply 5 - Continued

This case gave us (and the surgeons) much to think about in terms of patient selection. Some of my colleagues are particularly distressed to find that some (many) of the patients are (reformed) alcoholics.D. John Doyle

slide52
Minimal Volume Resuscitation

Recent studies have shown possible adverse outcomes with aggressive fluid resuscitation and restoration of blood pressure prior to control of bleeding source, esp. in penetrating torso trauma.

(Minimal volume fluid resuscitation : Aim for MAP of 40 mm Hg or a SBP of 60 to 80 mm Hg)

slide53
Immediate Versus Delayed Fluid Resuscitation for Hypotensive Patients With Penetrating Torso Injuries
  • Bickell, W.H., et al, N Engl J Med 331:1105, 1994
  • Prospective trial of 598 patients with penetrating torso trauma and systolic BP < 90 mm Hg
  • Standard resuscitation vs limited resuscitation (until time of surgical intervention)
limited resuscitation
Limited resuscitation
  • 375 mls IV fluid
  • Initial BP 72 mm Hg systolic
  • 30% mortality
  • 23% complication rate
standard resuscitation
Standard Resuscitation
  • 2,480 mls IV fluid
  • Initial BP 78mm Hg systolic
  • 38% mortality (p=0.04)
  • 30% complication rate
comment by dr edward crosby
Comment by Dr. Edward Crosby

Two solitudes are evolving regarding the optimum timing and scale of fluid administration after penetrating trauma.

One view is that immediate fluid resuscitation should be avoided in victims of penetrating trauma, since restoration of the blood pressure may promote further hemorrhage. This may result in the need for massive blood transfusion with resultant dilutional coagulopathy, and technical surgical difficulties.

Dr. Edward Crosby, University of Ottawa

comment by dr edward crosby57
Comment by Dr. Edward Crosby

The opposing (and more conventional) view is that fluid resuscitation should be started immediately since the longer the period of shock the greater the risk of developing multiple system organ failure. An argument against fluid restriction is that the blood pressure at presentation is an important factor influencing survival following trauma with the incidence of multisystem complications correlating with the duration and intensity of shock. An additional concern is that, should there be barriers to rapid surgical intervention, non-resuscitated patients may exsanguinate while awaiting operation.

comment by dr edward crosby58
Comment by Dr. Edward Crosby

The majority of patients assessed by Bickell were in hospital within 30 min of reported injury and entered the operating room in less than one hour of hospital time. Finally, it must be recognized that the reviewed studies (animal and human) address models and clinical situations relating to penetrating injury and are not generalizable to the patient population with blunt traumatic injury.

Dr. Edward Crosby, University of Ottawa

slide59

SpecialOpsMedicine.Com

“The only benefit of "controlled shock" management of a patient with penetrating body cavity trauma and an uncontrolled internal arterial hemorrhage is a hope that the hemorrhage will eventually clot. Hopefully, a stasis at a low BP will occur allowing a clot to form. Studies have shown, in the early stages of fibrinogen clot formation, raising the systolic pressure above 80mm Hg will weaken or break the clot formation causing the bleeding to resume. That’s why a therapeutic goal of 70-80mm Hg and a pulse of <120 BPM is desired to prevent this clot from weakening. The state of controlled shock can only be maintained for a short period of time (1-2 hours) before systemic complications and organ failure begin to occur. Rapid evacuation and transport to a surgeon, and an infusion of the whole blood are the only treatments that will save the patient’s life.”