1 / 12

Good Scientific Practice Helga Nolte, Hamburg, Gerlinde Sponholz, Berlin

Good Scientific Practice Helga Nolte, Hamburg, Gerlinde Sponholz, Berlin. Estonian Research Council – September 17th/18th, 2015 – Tartu and Tallinn. Preventive measures in all university guidelines Educating young researches Fostering awareness Role model of experienced researchers

rmcnichols
Download Presentation

Good Scientific Practice Helga Nolte, Hamburg, Gerlinde Sponholz, Berlin

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Good Scientific Practice Helga Nolte, Hamburg, Gerlinde Sponholz, Berlin Estonian Research Council – September 17th/18th, 2015 – Tartu and Tallinn

  2. Preventivemeasures in all universityguidelines • Educatingyoungresearches • Fosteringawareness • Rolemodelofexperiencedresearchers • Responsible Mentoring • Organizationalmeasurestofoster GSP • Open and transparent systemsofdecisionmaking Estonian Research Council – September 17th/18th, 2015 – Tartu and Tallinn

  3. N. Steneck (2009): Introduction to the responsible Conduct of Research. DIANE Publishing , Darby PA Estonian Research Council – September 17th/18th, 2015 – Tartu and Tallinn

  4. Fanelli D (2009) HowManyScientistsFabricateandFalsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data. • PLosONE 4(5): e5738. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005738 21 Studies included Fabrication, falsification or alteration of results admitted, 2 % ( 1 % - 4 %) directly observed, 14 % (9 % - 20 %) Questionableresearchpractices admitted, 10 % (5 % - 34 %) directly observed, 29 % (6 % -72 %) Estonian Research Council – September 17th/18th, 2015 – Tartu and Tallinn

  5. Experience with Misconduct Gommel et al (2015) Teaching Good Scientific Practice: Resultsfrom a Survey andObservationsfromTwoHundredCourses. JUNQ 5/2: 11-16 Estonian Research Council – September 17th/18th, 2015 – Tartu and Tallinn

  6. Curriculum for Teaching Good Scientific Practice October 2009: first German version October 2011: English Version Curriculum “Good Scientific Practice” for Courses in Science and Medicine October 2012: revisionandextension http://www.ombudsman-fuer-die-wissenschaft.de Estonian Research Council – September 17th/18th, 2015 – Tartu and Tallinn

  7. GSP-Courses since 2009 Forstudents, doctoral and junior scientists/ PhD-students workshopshortworkshopintro- lecture2009 2 1 2010 5 3 12011 16 3 2012 41 122013 48 4 122014 63 5 14 2015 (01-08) 25 2 Estonian Research Council – September 17th/18th, 2015 – Tartu and Tallinn

  8. Contents of GSP Workshops Processof Research Good Scientific Practice - datamanagement Scientific Misconduct - publicationprocess - authorship Local, national - mentoring international - cooperation rules, codes - conflictofinterest - (researchwith human subjectsandanimals) Dealingwithconflicts; ombudssystem; potential consequences Estonian Research Council – September 17th/18th, 2015 – Tartu and Tallinn

  9. GSP Teachers‘ Training • 2013 3 • 2014 1 • 2015 planned 2 • 2016 planned 7 • Different extentandintensity • Different requestsandtargetgroups Estonian Research Council – September 17th/18th, 2015 – Tartu and Tallinn

  10. Teachers’ Training„Good Scientific Practice“ • Goals • The participants learn to develop and conduct workshops on good scientific practice. The participants will • acquire specific knowledge on good scientific practice • acquire specific knowledge on questionable practice and on scientific misconduct, and learn how to deal adequately with both • develop their teaching concepts • train their teaching skills • reflect their role as researchers, supervisors and mentors Estonian Research Council – September 17th/18th, 2015 – Tartu and Tallinn

  11. Teachers’ Training„Good Scientific Practice“ • Content • GSP: historical background; local, national and international guidelines, rules and recommendations • Scientific misconduct: causes, definitions, types, frequency and paradigmatic cases • Data management: generation, documentation, storage, ownership and safeguarding • Authorship and the process of publishing • Supervision and mentoring • Conflicts of interest and scientific cooperation • Dealing with conflicts and scientific misconduct: ombudspersons, whistleblowing, investigative commissions, procedures and consequences • National and international resources on “good scientific practice” • Teaching concepts: methodology, structure, case discussion, team teaching, evaluation Estonian Research Council – September 17th/18th, 2015 – Tartu and Tallinn

  12. Problems of implementation • Additional teaching load • Compensation for additional work (money, time..) • Teaching task voluntary or obligatory • Voluntary vs. mandatory participation of students • “Lone fighter” or network • Missing overview about the real demand / need • Discomfort in view of too much insider knowledge ! Estonian Research Council – September 17th/18th, 2015 – Tartu and Tallinn

More Related