1 / 16

Simulating the Tragedy of the Commons Using Agent-Based Modeling

Simulating the Tragedy of the Commons Using Agent-Based Modeling. Josh Lee Computer Systems Lab 08/09. Tragedy of the Commons -autonomous individuals -communal resources Experimental Economics -conventional economic wisdom Agent-Based Modeling -agent types -NetLogo. Abstract.

rlocker
Download Presentation

Simulating the Tragedy of the Commons Using Agent-Based Modeling

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Simulating the Tragedy of the Commons Using Agent-Based Modeling Josh Lee Computer Systems Lab 08/09

  2. Tragedy of the Commons -autonomous individuals -communal resources Experimental Economics -conventional economic wisdom Agent-Based Modeling -agent types -NetLogo Abstract

  3. Example: Waste -individuals contributing to group problem -finite resources Sahel -three-tier model -more complex, but more realistic/practical The Tragedy ofthe Commons

  4. “Understanding the Tragedy of the Sahel,” Corey L. Lofdahl -original Tragedy of the Commons ABMS “The Tragedy of the Commons,” Garrett Hardin -max goods v. max population -stabilization Background

  5. Sahel, overshoot-and-collapse Individual agent behavior -agent cooperation (or lack thereof); experimental economics -emergent behavior, dominant behavior types System Dynamics v. Agent-Based Modeling

  6. Fig. 1: Model, Upon Opening

  7. Adjustable Parameters “grass-growth-rate” “grass-energy” “cattle-energy” Likelihood of finding resources Example: -greater grass-growth-rate >greater cattle population >lower grass count >greater competition -long-term, greater instability Model Overview

  8. Fig. 2: Population Fluctuations (Instability)

  9. Drought Length, frequency Demonstrates instability Emergent Behavior Dominant behavior type Population stability Further Development

  10. Fig 4: Unique Emergent Behavior

  11. - systematically varies parameters - extensive data output BehaviorSpace

  12. -Stability decreases with increases in grass-energy; begins to have irreversible ramifications around ~17 -Human populations (higher level tier) less stable than cattle populations (lower level tier) BehaviorSpace

  13. -Raised cattle-threshold/people-threshold leads to greater stability -Greater stability leads to more clearly delineated population patterns Behavior Space, cont.

  14. “Greater stability leads tomore clearly delineatedpopulation patterns” V.

  15. Conclusions • -Greatest stability: minimal competition, ability to sustain at a steady population rate • -Stability: ability to counteract perturbances • -Balance between resources, population size, and reproduction rate

More Related