1 / 16

R&D of Strip/Block Scintillators

R&D of Strip/Block Scintillators. E.P.Jacosalem, S.Iba, N.Nakajima, H.Ono, A.L.Sanchez, A.M.Bacala & H.Miyata GLD Calorimeter Group 8 th ACFA Workshop on Physics and Detector at the Linear Collider EXCO, Daegu , Korea July 12, 2005. Contents:. Introduction

riona
Download Presentation

R&D of Strip/Block Scintillators

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. R&D of Strip/Block Scintillators E.P.Jacosalem, S.Iba, N.Nakajima, H.Ono, A.L.Sanchez, A.M.Bacala & H.Miyata GLD Calorimeter Group 8th ACFA Workshop on Physics and Detector at the Linear Collider EXCO, Daegu , Korea July 12, 2005

  2. Contents: • Introduction • Research Design and Methodology • Scintillator’s length and surface covering dependence on Pulse Height (Strip type) • Position dependence (Strip type) • Scintillator’s thickness dependence (Block type) • Results • Summary • Future plan

  3. Introduction • Motivation • R&D for new calorimeters • Needs fine segmentation • Small scintillators • Calorimeter Designs (GLD) • Past and Existing • Layers of strip type plastic scintillators (10x200x2mm) • Layers of tile type scintillators (40x40x1mm) • PMT as read out • WLS Fiber • Under construction • Stack of Z-layer + X-layer strip scintillators (10x200x2mm) + Tile-layer (40x40x1mm) • Absorber placed in between layers • SiPM/MPC (Multi pixels Photon Counter) as read out • WLS fiber

  4. Newdesign? • smaller scintillators • strip type for EM and hadron analog calorimeter • block type for digital hadron calorimeter • best light collection efficiency • WLS fiber • Photon Sensor Photon sensor Photon sensor • This study focuses • small strip and block type sensors • different surface coverings • different lengths • thickness Photon sensor Calorimeter Design under construction

  5. Research Design & Methodology • Sensor : Strip type scintillator ( length: 4,8,12, 16cm) Block type scintillator (thickness: 2, 4, 5, 6 and 8mm) • Trigger : Scintillator (about 1cmx8cmx5mm ) directly connected to PMT • Source : 90Sr (beta-ray) • WLS fiber diameter: 1.0mm ; 1.6mm (length: 20 cm) • PMT (sensor) : 16 Ch MAPMT H6568-10, HV : -950V • PMT (trigger) : H3164, HV : -900V Setup

  6. Research Design & Methodology cont.. 10x40x2mm 10x80x2mm 10x120x2mm 10x160x2mm Strip Type Scintillator 3M Radiant Mirror Film Teflon 10x60x2mm BlackSheet White Paint with Teflon White Paint Surface Covering (1.7mm groove for 1.6mm WLS fiber) Gold Coat • Compared each type using • ADC system • Used WLS fiber with diameter of 1.0mm and 1.6mm • Determined the systematic error White Paint Aluminum Evaporation 10x40x2mm scintillator (1.4mm groove for 1mm fiber)

  7. Research Design & Methodology cont.. 8mmthick 5mmthick 6mmthick 4mmthick 2mmthick 10x10mm teflon-wrapped scintillator Block Type Scintillator • fiber hole of 1.1mmΦ at the center • fiber not pass through the other end (1.0mm distance) • measured the thickness dependence on pulse height. sketch of block scintillator

  8. Pulse Height Signal Source point 10mm 2.5 mm pedestal Top view signal Strip-type Sensor Source point 5.0mm 2.5mm To PMT Top view Block-type Sensor Research Design and Methodology cont.. To PMT fitted pulse height • Plotted the pulse height (ADC Counts) vs. sensors length with different surface covering • Measured and plotted the position dependence across and along the strip scintillator To PMT Source point location

  9. 3M radiant mirror film Teflon White paint with teflon White paint Aluminum evaporation Black sheet Gold 3M radiant mirror film Teflon White paint with teflon White paint Aluminum evaporation Black sheet Gold Systerror Results: • 3M radiant mirror film has the greatest pulse height. • There is a trend that pulse height slightly increases with sensor’s length for 3M radiant mirror film and Teflon.

  10. Results cont.. syst error 3M radiant mirror film Teflon White paint with teflon White paint Aluminum evaporation Black sheet • 3M radiant mirror film has greatest pulse height. • 3M radiant mirror film and teflon wrapped scintillators showed that good total reflection occurred when thin air gap is present between reflector and scintillator.

  11. Results cont.. PMT 1.6mmΦ WLS_3Mmirror film 1.0mmΦ WLS_3Mmirror film 1.6mmΦ WLS_ Teflon 1.0mmΦ WLS_ Teflon measurement across the strip WLS fiber measurementalong the strip Keyhole Position Dependence along the Strip Scintillator (2.5 mm from the center) Position Dependence along the Strip Scintillator (2.5 mm from the center) • Position dependence along the strip scintillator showed the uniformity of light transmission from the sensor to PMT.

  12. Results cont.. Position Dependence across the Strip Scint (3M radiant film) 1.6mmΦ WLS ; source positioned @ 10 (bl) and 20mm (gr) from the far end small peaks 1.6mm 1mmΦ WLS ; source positioned @ 10mm (bl) and 20mm (r) from the far end Fiber diameter 1mm • ‘dip’ is 40% corresponds to scint. thickness(300microns) f0r 1.6mmΦ fiber • small peaks near the fiber (1.6mmΦ fiber) • no significant difference on pulse height values across the strip at 2 different locations (20mm and 10 mm from end) • light yield increases about 100% as fiber diameter is increased from 1.0mm to 1.6mm for 3M radiant mirror film.

  13. Results cont.. 3M radiant mirror film Teflon Thickness Dependence of Block Type Scintillator for Digital Hadron Calorimeter • No peak observed at 8mm thick. • Pulse height almost proportional with scint thickness for 3M radiant mirror film. • Light output at 6mm is larger than that of strip scint (10x40x2mm) then the block scint is enough for digital hadron calorimeter.

  14. Summary 1. 3M radiant mirror film covered scintillator found to have the greatest pulse height for both WLS fiber diameters (1.0 & 1.6mm). 2. There is a trend that pulse height slightly increases with sensor’s length for 3M radiant mirror film and Teflon. 3. 3M radiant mirror film covered scintillators using 1.6mmΦ WLS fiber had about 100% greater pulse height compared to scintillators with 1.0mmΦ fiber.

  15. Summary cont.. 4. Position dependence along the strip scintillator showed the uniformity of light transmission from the sensor to PMT for 3M radiant mirror film and teflon wrapped scintillators. 5. ‘dip’ is 40% corresponds to scint. thickness(300microns) for 1.6mmΦ fiber 6. Block type scintillator’s pulse height is almost proportional to its thickness

  16. Future plans • Do simulation for light transmission for the strip and block type scintillator. • Test the best light yield scintillator using photon sensor (MPC/SiPM) as read out through WLS fiber. Thank you very much...

More Related