1 / 11

Data Feedback System for the National Postsecondary Education Cooperative (NPEC)

Data Feedback System for the National Postsecondary Education Cooperative (NPEC). Presented by Brenda Albright Joe Collins Executive Director of NPEC Pinkerton Computer Consultants. Data Feedback Project Goal #1.

rico
Download Presentation

Data Feedback System for the National Postsecondary Education Cooperative (NPEC)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Data Feedback Systemfor the National Postsecondary Education Cooperative (NPEC) Presented by Brenda Albright Joe CollinsExecutive Director of NPEC Pinkerton Computer Consultants

  2. Data Feedback Project Goal #1 • 1. Develop an application that will dynamically create Institution Indicator Reports based on IPEDS Staff, Finance, Completion and Enrollment data.

  3. Data Feedback Project Goal #2 • 2. Report data specific to the institution, as well as data from a Comparison Group of institutions based on Carnegie Code, Control Number, Region,Enrollment Size and Geography. Example: San Francisco State University Carnegie Code = 21 (496 institutions) Control = 1 (249 institutions) Region = Southwest and Far West (58 inst.)

  4. Data Feedback Project Goal #3 3. Distribute Institution Indicator Reports to institutions via Email and US Postal Mail.

  5. Organizations Involved

  6. IPEDS Data Sources/Collections 1. Institutional Characteristics Directory and general information about each institutions – for Carnegie classification and control values. Collected in the Fall. 2. Fall Enrollment Institutional enrollment as of October 15, by enrollment status, level, race/ethnicity and gender of student. Collected in the Spring. 3. Staff Institutional employees by occupational activity, race/ethnicity and gender. Collected in Fall of odd-numbered years. 4. Finance Institutional revenues, expenditures and other financial information. Collected in the Spring. 5. Student Financial Aid The number and percent of full-time, first-time, degree/certificate-seeking undergraduate students receiving student financial aid, by type of aid. Collected in the Spring.

  7. IPEDS Dataflow

  8. Comparison Groups 67 Comparison Groups Smallest Group = 5 institutions Largest Group = 91 institutions Average Group = 39 institutions

  9. Administration Console

  10. Review Prototype of Data Feedback Report

  11. Questions and Discussion Joe Collins Pinkerton Computer Consultants Alexandria, Va. collinsj@pcci.com

More Related