classical and neo classical criminology l.
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Classical and Neo-Classical Criminology PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Classical and Neo-Classical Criminology

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 27

Classical and Neo-Classical Criminology - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Uploaded on

Classical and Neo-Classical Criminology. Kelly Cheeseman Dial AJ 325. The Backdrop of Classical Criminology. The prior church regime/demonology Challenge of the aristocracy and reign of church Began to examine human nature and social conditions

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Classical and Neo-Classical Criminology' - richard_edik

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
classical and neo classical criminology

Classical and Neo-Classical Criminology

Kelly Cheeseman Dial

AJ 325

the backdrop of classical criminology
The Backdrop of Classical Criminology
  • The prior church regime/demonology
  • Challenge of the aristocracy and reign of church
  • Began to examine human nature and social conditions
  • Rise of the cities and fall of the agricultural era
  • Classical criminology was created from writings about law and society less than from thinking about criminal behavior
enlightenment thinking
Enlightenment Thinking
  • Hedonism
  • Social contract
  • Secularization of Society
  • Human Dignity
founders cesare beccaria 1738 1794
FoundersCesare Beccaria 1738-1794
  • Wrote: On Crimes and Punishments ( 1764)
  • Beccaria believed people want to achieve pleasure and avoid pain
  • Crime and its outcomes provide some pleasure
  • Thus to deter crime pain on some level must be administered
  • What types of pain? Who administers it?
founders jeremy bentham 1748 1833
FoundersJeremy Bentham 1748-1833
  • British philosopher who helped popularize Beccaria’s views.
  • Believed that punishments are in themselves harmful, so what they try to prevent must be more evil than the punishment.
  • Father of utilitarianism
  • Creator of deterrence theory
classical criminology
Classical Criminology
  • Decisions to violate the law are weighed against the possible punishment for such a violation
  • To deter crime, the pain of punishment must outweigh the benefit of illegal gain.
assumptions of human nature
Assumptions of Human Nature
  • Individuals have free will: Freedom to make personal behavioral choices unencumbered by environmental factors such as poverty or ideological beliefs
  • Individuals maximize utility: (i.e., happiness, food, resources) by weighing the benefits and costs of their future actions before deciding on behavior
four utilitarian objectives of punishment

When it cannot prevent a crime, to convince the offender to commit a less serious one.

To prevent all

criminal offenses.

To prevent a crime

as cheaply as possible.

To ensure that a criminal

uses no more force than

is necessary.

Four Utilitarian Objectives of Punishment
classic deterrence theory
Classic Deterrence Theory
  • Primary Purpose of punishment is deterrence rather than vengeance
  • Severity: Punishment must be just severe enough to overcome the gain from a crime. Punishment that is too severe is unjust, and punishment that is not severe enough will not deter
  • Without proper proportionality, people will not be deterred from committing more serious crimes ( i.e. if rape and murder were both punished with death, a rapist would have little reason to refrain from killing the victim
classic deterence celerity and certainty
Classic Deterence: Celerity and Certainty
  • Celerity: swiftness with which criminal sanctions are applied after the commission of crime ( where does apprehension fit in?)
  • Certainty: probability of apprehension and punishment for a crime.
    • If I am caught will they really punish me? ( mere threats versus carrying out)
what is proportionality
What is proportionality?
  • Rape
  • Theft of a cell phone
  • Theft of a car
  • Killing a husband/mistress when you catch them in bed together
  • Assault
  • People who neglect/abuse those in a nursing home
General Deterrence

Depends on fear of penalties

Convincing potential offenders that the potential pain outweighs the potential benefits

Specific Deterrence

Focuses on the individual offender

Convince him/her not to repeat their criminal behavior

absolute and marginal deterrence
Absolute and Marginal Deterrence
  • Absolute Deterrence: A particular punishment can deter a type of crime completely.
  • Marginal Deterrence: A relatively more severe penalty will produce some reduction in crime
  • State vs. informal control
the purposes of punishment
The Purposes of Punishment
  • General Deterrence – By punishing the offender we hope that others considering committing the same crime will not think it worth it
  • Specific Deterrence – same as above, but with respect to that offender themselves, not others
  • Incapacitation – if the offenders is in jail, society is safe
  • Retribution – offenders “deserve” punishment as a payment to society for their crimes
  • Moral Outrage – Catharsis and relief for society
  • Rehabilitation – may provide and opportunity to help/change the offender
  • Restitution – offenders should compensate their victims
classical crim today
Classical Crim. Today
  • Are criminals today influenced by a theory that is rooted in the 17th/18th century?
  • Historically
    • Bill of Rights
    • Thomas Jefferson – desire to end death penalty in US
    • Prisons
    • Punishment fit the crime
  • Neo-classical criminology/Rational Choice/Routine Activities Theory
rebirth of classical thoughts in the 70 s and 80 s
Rebirth of Classical thoughts in the 70’s and 80”s
  • National surveys fail to find rehabilitation programs “that work” end of rehab in 70’s
  • Thinking About Crime by James Q. Wilson debunks view that crime was a function of external forces
  • Wilson proposes a forceful reaction to crime, otherwise, those sitting on the fence will get the idea that “crime pays”
  • “get tough on crime”
the deterrence hypothesis
The Deterrence Hypothesis
  • When the certainty, severity, and celerity of criminal sanctions are high in a population, criminal behavior will be low.
  • Should be a significant decrease in violent crime
food for thought
Food for thought
  • The 5 countries with the highest homicide rates that do not impose the death penalty average 21.6 murders per every 100,000 people.
  • The 5 countries with the highest homicide rate that do impose the death penalty average 41.6 murders every 100,000 people.
  • States with DP have higher murder rates than those without the DP.
  • Does this show that deterrence theory does not work?
rational choice theory born out of economics
Rational Choice TheoryBorn out of economics
  • Assume individuals desire utility (e.g. happiness, wealth, etc.)
  • Operating within their means ( or constraints) individuals attempt to achieve their desires goals)
  • The ‘rational Choice” is the one that obtains desired goals (e.g., the most utility) for the lowest cost.
  • Material or monetary benefits
  • Non-pecuniary benefits ( psychological gains, excitement, revenge, sense of accomplishment, reputation and honor)
  • Material costs
  • Psychic costs: possible feelings of guilt from committing crime, shame from friends
  • Opportunity costs: time that could be spent doing something else
  • Expected punishment costs ( the main focus of deterrence theorists)

Criminals tend to

overestimate the money they receive

from crime

Criminals believe there

is no choice, legitimate

work is not available.

Criminals are overly

optimistic about getting

away with each

individual crime

Research indicates that crime pays

relatively little. Then why do so many

criminals continue to commit crime?

structuring crime
Structuring Crime
  • Not only do criminal structure their career but they rationally choose
    • The type of crime to commit
    • Where it occurs
    • Who or what will be the target
    • The time the crime will be committed
routine activities theory
Routine Activities Theory
  • Crime will occur if the following three factors interact:
  • Motivated Offenders*
  • Suitable targets
  • Lack of capable guardians

*theory assumes this will always be

what are our modern day routine activities vs 1950

Women stayed at home

Social activities are more home based

What would people steal?


Many women work outside of home

Social activities are more often away from home

What would people steal?

What are our modern day Routine activities vs. 1950?
how do you stop crime according to rat
How do you stop crime according to RAT?
  • Target hardening ( suitability)
  • Surveillance (guardianship)
  • Target removal
  • Reducing temptation
  • Surveillance by employees
  • This is situational crime prevention
classical neo classical
  • Is this a good or bad theory?
  • Does it influence how we view crime and criminal justice in America
  • Does it answer the 2 basic questions?
  • Is it useful?