1 / 14

Janusz Cofala

Janusz Cofala. Air pollution control costs and emission reduction cost curves. Methodology, cost components. All costs in constant Euro 2005 Net of taxes Annual costs method Costs based on international investment and operating experience

rianne
Download Presentation

Janusz Cofala

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Janusz Cofala Air pollution control costs and emission reduction cost curves

  2. Methodology, cost components • All costs in constant Euro 2005 • Net of taxes • Annual costs method • Costs based on international investment and operating experience • For developing countries – local components in investment costs included • Three levels of discount rate (under implementation) • 4% (social) • 10% (business) • 20% (private)

  3. Cost coverage • Expenditures on emission controls include: • capital investments • fixed operating costs (related to capital investments), and • variable operating costs • GAINS calculates annual costs: • per unit of activity level • per ton of pollutant abated

  4. Cost components • Cost parameters: • common (the same for all countries) • - unit investment costs, • - fixed O+M costs, • - extra demand for labor, energy, and materials • country-specific • - size of installation, • - plant factors, • - prices for labor, electricity, fuel and other materials, • - cost of waste disposal

  5. Investment costs Stationary sources: I = (civ+ cif /bs)*v*(1+r) where: I – capital investments civ, cif – coefficients of investment function bs – boiler size v – relative flue gas volume (hard coal boiler =1) r – retrofit cost factor Mobile sources: I – Investment per vehicle

  6. Annualized investments, fixed O+M costs Annualized investments (Ian): Ian = ann*I where: ann – annuity (annual payments that ensure that investments are paid off with interest at the end of the lifetime): ann = q/[1- (1+q)-lt] q – interest rate lt – lifetime of control equipment Annual fixed operation and maintenance (OMfix) costs: OMfix= I*f where: f – percentage of investments

  7. Variable O+M costs OMvar = λl*cl /pf + λe*ce+ ef ∗η∗ (λs*cs+λd*cd ) where: η - emission removal efficiency, λl - labor demand (per thermal capacity unit), λe - additional energy (electricity and/or fuel) demand (per unit of fuel used), λS , λd - demand for sorbent and waste disposal (per unit of pollutant reduced), cl - labor cost, ce - energy price, cs - sorbent cost, cd - waste disposal cost, pf - plant factor (annual operating hours at full load), ef - unabated emission factor

  8. Unit costs Per unit of activity (e.g., GJ fuel used): cact = (Ian + OMfix)/pf +OMvar Per ton of pollutant abated cpoll = cact/(ef * η) For some sectors (e.g., process sources) costs are given directly per unit of activity

  9. Rules for reporting costs for multi-pollutant measures • GAINS optimization - "technology-based" approach: simultaneous effect of the measure on emissions of several pollutants included. Cost is associated with the measure, no cost allocation to pollutants necessary • Reporting tables: total cost reported under main pollutant. If a measure reduces NOx (and other pollutants), all costs are reported under NOx. If a measure reduces PM (and other pollutants but not NOx), all costs reported under PM

  10. Average vs. marginal costs Average cost – cost per ton of pollutant removed with a given control option (from the unabated case) Marginal cost - extra cost for an additional measure per extra abatement of that measure (compared to the abatement with the option with lower efficiency) Stage 3 Slopes of red lines – average costs Slopes of blue lines – marginal costs Stage 2 Stage 1

  11. An example cost curve for SO2 Cost curves describe how pollution control costs increase with increasing levels of emission reductions.

  12. Cost curve for SO2 (model results - table) Categories of control technologies: A – can always be replaced with more efficient one; B – once installed cannot be replaced with more efficient one; Capacity classes: 1 – existing; 2 – new (post-2009)

  13. Cost curve for SO2 (model results - graph)

  14. Example of a cost curve (NH3) +Biofiltration +Housing Storage and application Urea subs.

More Related