adopt or adapt in math support for districts and schools on curriculum decision making
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
Adopt or Adapt in Math: Support for Districts and Schools on Curriculum Decision Making

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 53

Adopt or Adapt in Math: Support for Districts and Schools on Curriculum Decision Making - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 54 Views
  • Uploaded on

Adopt or Adapt in Math: Support for Districts and Schools on Curriculum Decision Making. Necessary Tools for Assessing Quality of Common Core Math Curriculum. Common Core Mathematics Standards Standards for Mathematical Practices The Shifts for Mathematics Math Content Emphases

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Adopt or Adapt in Math: Support for Districts and Schools on Curriculum Decision Making' - ria-pickett


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
adopt or adapt in math support for districts and schools on curriculum decision making

Adopt or Adapt in Math: Support for Districts and Schools on Curriculum Decision Making

EngageNY.org

slide2
Necessary Tools for Assessing Quality

of Common Core Math Curriculum

  • Common Core Mathematics Standards
  • Standards for Mathematical Practices
  • The Shifts for Mathematics
  • Math Content Emphases
  • Key Fluencies by Grade Level
  • Learning Progressions
  • Publishers’ Criteria for Mathematics
  • EQUIP Rubric for Mathematics

EngageNY.org

2

slide3
These Standards are not intended to be new names for old ways of doing business. They are a call to take the next step. … It is time to recognize that standards are not just promises to our children, but promises we intend to keep.

CCSSM, p. 5

EngageNY.org

3

slide5
6 Shifts in Mathematics

Focus

Coherence

Fluency

Deep Understanding

Applications

Dual Intensity

Instructional Shifts in Mathematics Demanded by the Core

5

EngageNY.org

5

shifts in assessments
Shifts in Assessments

Six Shifts in Mathematics Assessments

EngageNY.org

slide8
The shape of math in A+ countries

Mathematics topics intended at each grade by at least two-thirds of A+ countries

Mathematics topics intended at each grade by at least two-thirds of 21 U.S. states

1 Schmidt, Houang, & Cogan, “A Coherent Curriculum: The Case of Mathematics.” (2002).

8

EngageNY.org

8

slide11
Math Content Emphases

EngageNY.org

11

slide12
Math Content Emphases

EngageNY.org

12

slide13
Math Content

Emphases

For

Grade 3

EngageNY.org

13

slide15
Learning Progressions

http://ime.math.arizona.edu/progressions/

EngageNY.org

15

slide17
The K–8 Publishers’ Criteria
  • Focus, Coherence, and Rigor in the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics
  • II. Criteria for Materials and Tools Aligned to the K–8 Standards
  • III. Appendix: “The Structure is the Standards”

EngageNY.org

17

slide18
II. Criteria for Materials and Tools

Aligned to the K–8 Standards

1. Focus on Major Work: In any single grade, students and teachers using the materials as designed spend the large majority of their time on the major work of each grade.

EngageNY.org

18

slide19
II. Criteria for Materials and Tools

Aligned to the K–8 Standards

2. Focus in Early Grades: Materials do not assess any of the following topics before the grade level indicated.

EngageNY.org

19

slide20
II. Criteria for Materials and Tools

Aligned to the K–8 Standards

3. Focus and Coherence through Supporting Work: Supporting content enhances focus and coherence simultaneously by engaging students in the major work of the grade.

4. Rigor and Balance: Materials and tools reflect the balances in the Standards and help students meet the Standards’ rigorous expectations, by (all of the following, in the case of comprehensive materials; at least one of the following for supplemental or targeted resources):

EngageNY.org

20

slide21
II. Criteria for Materials and Tools

Aligned to the K–8 Standards

4. Rigor and Balance: Materials and tools reflect the balances in the Standards and help students meet the Standards’ rigorous expectations, by (all of the following, in the case of comprehensive materials; at least one of the following for supplemental or targeted resources):

a. Developing students’ conceptual understanding of key mathematical concepts, especially where called for in specific content standards or cluster headings.

b. Giving attention throughout the year to individual standards that set an expectation of procedural skill and fluency.

c. Using the materials as designed to spend sufficient time working with engaging applications, without losing focus on the major work of each grade.

EngageNY.org

21

slide22
II. Criteria for Materials and Tools

Aligned to the K–8 Standards

5. Consistent Progressions: Materials are consistent with the progressions in the Standards, by (all of the following):

a. Basing content progressions on the grade-by-grade progressions in the Standards.

b. Giving all students extensive work with grade-level problems.

c. Relating grade level concepts explicitly to prior knowledge from earlier grades.

EngageNY.org

22

slide23
II. Criteria for Materials and Tools

Aligned to the K–8 Standards

6. Coherent Connections: Materials foster coherence through connections at a single grade, where appropriate and where required by the Standards, by (all of the following):

a. Including learning objectives that are visibly shaped by CCSSM cluster headings.

b. Including problems and activities that serve to connect two or more clusters in a domain, or two or more domains in a grade, in cases where these connections are natural and important.

c. Preserving the focus, coherence, and rigor of the Standards even when targeting specific objectives.

EngageNY.org

23

slide24
II. Criteria for Materials and Tools

Aligned to the K–8 Standards

7. Practice-Content Connections: Materials meaningfully connect content standards and practice standards.

8. Focus and Coherence via Practice Standards: Materials promote focus and coherence by connecting practice standards with content that is emphasized in the Standards.

9. Careful Attention to Each Practice Standard: Materials attend to the full meaning of each practice standard.

EngageNY.org

24

slide25
II. Criteria for Materials and Tools

Aligned to the K–8 Standards

10. Emphasis on Mathematical Reasoning: Materials support the Standards’ emphasis on mathematical reasoning, by (all of the following):

a. Prompting students to construct viable arguments and critique the arguments of others concerning key grade-level mathematics that is detailed in the content standards

b. Engaging students in problem solving as a form of argument.

c. Explicitly attending to the specialized language of mathematics.

EngageNY.org

25

slide26
Collaboratively built tools

informed and approved by the authors of the CCSS,

which evaluate the Common Core alignment of curricular materials

Actualize the Publishers Criteria

EngageNY.org

26

slide29
Dimension I

Alignment to

The Depth of

the CCSS

EngageNY.org

29

slide30
Dimension II

Key Shifts

In the CCSS

EngageNY.org

30

slide31
Dimension III

Instructional

Supports

EngageNY.org

31

slide32
Dimension IV

Assessment

EngageNY.org

32

slide34
Overall Rating

EngageNY.org

34

slide41
Dimension I

Alignment to

The Depth of

the CCSS

EngageNY.org

41

slide42
Dimension I

EngageNY.org

42

slide43
Dimension II

Key Shifts

In the CCSS

EngageNY.org

43

slide44
Dimension II

EngageNY.org

44

slide45
Dimension II

EngageNY.org

45

slide46
Dimension III

Instructional

Supports

EngageNY.org

46

slide47
Dimension III

EngageNY.org

47

slide48
Dimension III

EngageNY.org

48

slide49
Dimension IV

Assessment

EngageNY.org

49

slide50
Dimension IV

EngageNY.org

50

slide51
Overall Rating

EngageNY.org

51

context for curriculum work
Context for Curriculum Work
  • Vendor Partners: $26 MM (RttT)
    • P-2 ELA: Core Knowledge
    • 3-8 ELA: Expeditionary Learning
    • 9-12 ELA: PCG & Odell Education
    • P-12 Math: Common Core, Inc.
  • Regents Research Fund/ SED = 3 FTE + 2 Mgrs
  • Teacher Reviewers = 50 teachers @ 10 hrs/wk
  • Intensive Review Cycles with SAP
  • SAP calibration and gradual release to RRF/ SED

EngageNY.org

slide53
What we’ve learned…
  • Highly Qualified Writers and Reviewers take up to 6 months to calibrate
    • Devotion to/ experience in a content area does not a CCSS writer/ reviewer make
    • A good teacher does not a curriculum writer/ reviewer make
    • Much of what must shift is sacred
  • Rhetorical alignment and actual alignment are two different things
  • CCSS stickers are easy to produce; true quality, rigor, and alignment are not
  • It often takes 6-8 revision cycles to get to necessary levels of quality/ rigor/ alignment
  • Deep understanding of the documents presented is critical

EngageNY.org

53

ad