uusia tuulia suurten j rvien alueelta ja manhattanilta n.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Uusia tuulia Suurten järvien alueelta.. ja Manhattanilta? PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Uusia tuulia Suurten järvien alueelta.. ja Manhattanilta?

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 22

Uusia tuulia Suurten järvien alueelta.. ja Manhattanilta? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 75 Views
  • Uploaded on

Uusia tuulia Suurten järvien alueelta.. ja Manhattanilta?. Kokemuksia osallistumismenetelmien käytöstä Pohjois-Amerikassa. VIEVE Työseminaari Levi 10-13.3.2004. Marika Palosaari. Osallistava suunnittelun taustaa.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Uusia tuulia Suurten järvien alueelta.. ja Manhattanilta?' - rhian


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
uusia tuulia suurten j rvien alueelta ja manhattanilta

Uusia tuulia Suurten järvien alueelta.. ja Manhattanilta?

Kokemuksia osallistumismenetelmien käytöstä Pohjois-Amerikassa

VIEVE Työseminaari Levi 10-13.3.2004. Marika Palosaari

osallistava suunnittelun taustaa
Osallistava suunnittelun taustaa
  • Suurten järvien alue: ”intensiivinen” vuorovaikutus ihmisen ja luonnon välillä  pitkät perinteet uusien lähestymistapojen testaamiseen
  • International Joint Commission (IJC): perustettu 1909 ”the Boundary Waters Treaty” sopimuksen myötä USA:n ja Kanadan yhteistyönä
osallistava suunnittelun taustaa1
Osallistava suunnittelun taustaa
  • Koordinoi Suurten järvien politiikkaa. 1960-lla osallistavan suunnittelun alullepanijana: kuulemistilaisuuksia, ”citizen advisory committee”
  • 1970-lta lähtien IJC lisännyt kansalaisosallistumisen muotoja  laaja NGO verkosto ollut merkittävä vaikuttaja bilateraalisen ekosysteemin hallinnan aloitteissa

http://www.ijc.org/

shared vision planning
Shared Vision Planning
  • Shared vision model (Richard N. Palmer)
  • Based on sound systems engineering principles, connects stakeholder concerns to water management decisions.
  • Critique: Jack P. Manno
innovatiivisia menetelmi
Innovatiivisia menetelmiä?

a) Innovatiivinen prosessi

b) Innovatiivinen sovellus perinteisestä menetelmästä

c) Yhteistyöhön perustuva sidosryhmien välinen ”partnership”, jolla annettavaa perinteisille menetelmille (Beierle & Konisky)

innovative p p mechanisms
”Innovative” p.p. mechanisms
  • Study Circles
  • Citizen juries
  • Round tables
  • Collaborative Watershed management
the value
The value?
  • Key strength of most of the innovative efforts is their focus on delibarative process
  • The focus on education and providing opportunities to share opinions and experience
  • May provide lessons about reaching out to members of wider public
  • May be valuable compliments to improved citizen involvement in env. policy making
conclusions
Conclusions
  • Turning over substantial amount of power to stakeholders may not be required for process to be successful
  • There are a number of ”outside the group” problems that raise larger questions about the legitimacy and significance of p.p.
  • A ”modular” approach may help resolve some problems of public participation
a practical theory of voice standing and influence
A Practical Theory of Voice, Standing, and Influence:

 Applying the Principles of ‘Listening to the City’ to Other Participatory Processes

by Sue L. Senecah

trust
Trust
  • At the heart of any process to build relationships is trust. Transparency, openness, fairness, timely and comprehensive information, and other descriptors are often used to characterize effective public involvement process elements that support the building and maintenance of trust.
how to built trust
How to built trust?
  • It is difficult to identify the elements of a process that would support the presence of trust.
  • Trust needs to be based on relationship building, monitoring, and adjusting in order to tackle thorny, uncertain, and potentially contentious content issues with safety, openness, and effectiveness.
slide13
Such a process must be characterized by the three critical process elements:

voice,

standing and

influence,  

that are interdependent

based on
Based on
  • Schutz’s (1958) theory of fundamental interpersonal relations orientation (FIRO): identify what members of small task groups needed to achieve cohesiveness as the key to effectiveness.
  • inclusion (being noticed, having prestige and esteem by being included),
  • affection (being liked, close personal ties) and
  • control (power over others).  
voice
Voice
  • Voice = Access.
  • access to a process that offers opportunity and safety as well as the potential for being heard.
  • Real opportunity for ideas and opinions being accorded civic standing. Access does not guarantee it, but flawed access can prevent it
slide16
1. the practical logistics
  • 2. a format that will support the honoring of participants’ contributions and the reaching of objectives
  • 3. the support of trained and competent professional volunteer facilitators
standing
Standing
  • Standing = Demonstration of Having Value in the Process.
  • civic standing, or the demonstration of and assurance that stakeholder input is valued, respected, and honored, that it is “heard.”
  • Support standing: what is really at stake for stakeholders, their interests.
  • Strive to understand what fears are driving the interests.
slide18
Without voice (access to process) and standing (demonstration of having value in the process), there can be little influence other than through contentious means (e.g., non-participation, protests, lawsuits). However, they do not constitute trust, and although they are essential, they will do more harm than good unless they lead to influence.
influence
Influence
  • Influence = Participating in, Contributing to, and Understanding Outcomes.
  • stakeholders’ meaningful participation is honored, leads to opportunities for gaining understanding, contributing, and influence before a decision is made.
  • they can be influential in, e.g. prioritizing and choosing strategies or even whether a proposal proceeds
value of the trinity of voice theory
Value of the Trinity of voice theory
  • Use in the design of other public policy processes that are multi-stakeholder and multi-objective.
  • As a template, it can be characterized to fit a case’s unique context and resources.
  • ?
slide21

• U.S. Institute for Environmental Conflict Resolution http://www.ecr.gov.

• The National Civic League http://www.ncl.org

• International Association for Public Participation

http://www.iap2.org

• U.S. Institute for Environmental Conflict Resolution http://www.ecr.gov

• Public Involvement Networkwww.pin.org

slide22

If any of the elements of voice, standing, or influence are out of balance or are missing, the process and relationship factors of any public involvement process will suffer and the content issues will overwhelm.