1 / 31

1. Ground-Based Observations of Mars and Venus Jeremy Bailey, Sarah Chamberlain, Andrew Simpson

1. Ground-Based Observations of Mars and Venus Jeremy Bailey, Sarah Chamberlain, Andrew Simpson (Australian Centre for Astrobiology, Macquarie University, Sydney) David Crisp, Vikki Meadows (Jet Propulsion Laboratory/Caltech) 2. Polarimetric Detection and Characterization of Extrasolar

rhea-cook
Download Presentation

1. Ground-Based Observations of Mars and Venus Jeremy Bailey, Sarah Chamberlain, Andrew Simpson

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 1. Ground-Based Observations of Mars and Venus Jeremy Bailey, Sarah Chamberlain, Andrew Simpson (Australian Centre for Astrobiology, Macquarie University, Sydney) David Crisp, Vikki Meadows (Jet Propulsion Laboratory/Caltech) 2. Polarimetric Detection and Characterization of Extrasolar Planets Jeremy Bailey (ACA) Jim Hough, Phil Lucas (University of Hertfordshire)

  2. Spectroscopic Imaging data. Narrow-band filter images. • UKIRT – • Excellent image quality. • IR spectrograph with R up to 4000 and long slit. • Ability to scan across Mars while guiding (correcting automatically for the motion of Mars).

  3. UKIRT Mars Images (2003) Further image processing (unsharp masking and smoothing) Long exposure image (Mauna Kea natural seeing) Selected best short exposure image UKIRT/UIST 0.06 arc sec pixels. 1.64mm 1Kx1K InSb detector windowed to 512x512, 90ms exposure.

  4. HST / Ground-Based Comparison UKIRT Sep 4 2003, 1.64mm HST Aug 24 2003, ACS

  5. Mars 2.12 mm Imaging

  6. Spectral Cubes 1024 spectral pixels 250 0.12 arcsec pixels 114 0.25 arcsec pixels

  7. Spectra

  8. Aug 17 Sep 4 CO2 ice absorption 2.29mm Water ice absorption 2.10mm Atmospheric CO2 absorption 2.00mm 2.25mm

  9. Aug 17 2003 Sep 4th 2003 UKIRT 2.2mm albedo UKIRT CO2 band depth MGS MOLA topography

  10. MOLA UKIRT

  11. CO2 band pressure measurement • Complications • Dust. • CO2 in Earth atmosphere. • Topography removal. • Sensitivity • 4-5 Pa (in total pressure of ~700 Pa).

  12. Mars Earth Light passes twice through Mars atmosphere and once through Earth’s atmosphere

  13. CO2 bands have unresolved structure Green - Earth White - Mars White - Earth Red - Earth+Mars

  14. Model Building Approach Solar spectrum Surface reflectance Mars atmosphere radiative transfer model Correct for Mars atmosphere High resolution spectrum Earth atmosphere transmission model Correct for Earth atmosphere Bin to observed resolution Compare Observed spectrum Observed spectrum

  15. Venus night side spectra in the near-IR Spectra with SPEX on the 3m IRTF (R ~ 2000) - Feb 19th 2001

  16. H2SO4 clouds (2.3mm) (40-70km altitudes) Spectra: IRTF SPEX, Feb 19th 2001 Images: AAT 3.9m IRIS2, Jul 9th 2004

  17. Venus O2 airglow at 1.27mm (>100km altitudes) Spectrum: IRTF SPEX, Feb 19th 2001 Image: ANU 2.3m CASPIR, Sep 26th 2002

  18. 1.27mm Airglow Variability Images: ANU 2.3m CASPIR, Sep 20-26th 2002

  19. Our Future Plans • Instrument Development • Demonstrate HST resolution or better from ground-based telescopes. • IR Spectroscopy R ~ 2000 and R > 100,000. • Continued observing program of Mars and Venus. • Long sequences of CO2 observations of Mars to look for weather systems. • High spectral resolution observations to measure winds and trace gases. • Development of modeling and analysis software • Techniques for Earth Atmosphere correction. • Retrieval algorithms for pressure, temperature, dust etc.

  20. Polarimetric Detection of Hot Jupiters • Light from planet is polarized and polarization varies around orbit as scattering angle changes. Star - unpolarized Combined light polarized at <10–5 Planet polarized at 5-10%, <10–4 of star “…. Polarization signatures … are well under the current limits of detectability which is a few x 10–4 in fractional polarization” (Seager et al. 2000). Seager, Whitney and Sasselov, 2000, Ap. J. 540, 504.

  21. Photoelastic Modulators (PEMs)

  22. Calibration Slide PEM Aperture Wheel Wollaston Prism (3 wedge cemented) Two Filter Wheels Fabry Lenses Avalanche Photodiode Modules Each channel (blue section) rotates about its axis Sky Channel Star Channel Entire instrument rotates about star channel axis

  23. Phil Lucas Jeremy Bailey PLANETPOL David Harrison Jim Hough Edwin Hirst

  24. Residual instrument polarization effects are removed by a “second-stage chopping” achieved by rotating the polarimeter channels (wollaston + detectors) relative to the PEM from +45 to –45 degrees. Telescope polarization is measured by tracking stars over a range of hour angle. With an altazimuth mounted telescope the telescope tube rotates relative to the sky.

  25. “Unpolarized” Stars

  26. Polarized Stars

  27. Tau Boo Data Fig 7(a) Q residuals and (b) U residuals (the brown points are the averages of each block of data)

  28. What the Polarization Can Tell Us • Position angle variation through orbit gives us the inclination. • and hence the mass of the planet removing the sin I uncertainty. • The presence or absence of Rayleigh scattering polarization provides information on the pressure at the cloud tops. • The orbital variation of polarization tells us about particle size and composition. • We will have some idea of the albedo and this will assist other direct detection techniques (e.g. photometry and spectrscopy).

  29. Summary of Results • PLANETPOL works and delivers repeatable polarization measurements at the 10–6 level. • The telescope polarization of the WHT is low and seems stable (over a few days at least). • Good news for us — It could be much more difficult to get reliable results in the presence of a telescope polarization at the 10–3 to 10–4 level. • Normal nearby stars have very low polarization (~3 x 10–6 or less). • Also good for us — We shouldn’t have too many problems from star polarization in interpreting the data from our extrasolar planet systems. • We are measuring t Boo to an accuracy of about 2-3 x 10–6 for a 24 minute integration. • More extended observations should be sufficient for a detection or a significant upper limit. • We have a 13 night run on the WHT in April/May 2005.

  30. Imaging Polarimetry • Similar polarization techniques using an imaging system can be used for detection and characterization of resolved planetary images. • e.g. From Adaptive Optics systems on large ground-based telescopes. • Space instruments such as TPF-C. • Polarimetry can be used as a differential technique to pick the planet out of the speckle noise halo around the star. • Polarimetry can be used to help characterize any detected planet.

More Related