1 / 11

Analysis of PC Chip Heat Sink Design

Analysis of PC Chip Heat Sink Design. Royce Tatton ME 340 Dr. Solovjov Fall 2006. The Problem. Problem 3.137 in Incropera and DeWitt Comparison of two fin arrays to be used as PC chip heat sink Which provides more heat transfer (better cooling)?. The Chip. Material – Ceramic Porcelain

rharder
Download Presentation

Analysis of PC Chip Heat Sink Design

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Analysis of PC Chip Heat Sink Design Royce Tatton ME 340 Dr. Solovjov Fall 2006

  2. The Problem • Problem 3.137 in Incropera and DeWitt • Comparison of two fin arrays to be used as PC chip heat sink • Which provides more heat transfer (better cooling)?

  3. The Chip • Material – Ceramic Porcelain • Dimensions – 53 X 57 X 10 mm • Temperature – 75° C Maximum

  4. Design A • Dimensions – 3 X 3 X 30 mm • Number – 6 X 9 array (54 total) • Material – 6061 Aluminum • Convection Coefficient – 125 W/m2K

  5. Design B • Dimensions – 1 X 1 X 7 mm • Number – 14 X 17 array (238 total) • Material – 6061 Aluminum • Convection Coefficient – 375 W/m2K

  6. Methods • Use COSMOSWorks 2006 to determine maximum flux and temperature distribution in Design A and Design B • Compare to analytical results

  7. Setup of Problem • Simplify by reducing to ¼ of the total geometry along symmetry planes • Apply temperature constraints to chip surfaces • Apply convection loads to top chip surface and fins

  8. Results – Design A • Maximum chip temperature of 75°C (348.15 K) • Resultant heat flux of 7.807E+5 W/m2 Temperature Plot Heat Flux Plot

  9. Results – Design B • Maximum chip temperature of 75°C (348.15 K) • Resultant heat flux of 1.002E+6 W/m2 • Design B provides greater cooling of chip Temperature Plot Heat Flux Plot

  10. Conclusions • Design B provides better cooling to the chip • Results agree with the results of the problem in the textbook • Conduction coefficient very significant factor • “Bigger” is not always better

  11. Recommendation • Always perform heat transfer analysis before making decision on intuition • Further analysis with radiation and other materials to find a better fin design

More Related