1 / 13

Edupoint Research 2004. Ivana Fastić Pajk & Zoran Birimiša (Users Research and Analysis dpt)

Edupoint Research 2004. Ivana Fastić Pajk & Zoran Birimiša (Users Research and Analysis dpt). project 231-003. About the project. Who? Social Research Institute “Ivo Pilar” Edupoint – CARNet educational dpt ZiP - Users Research and Analysis dpt Where? Academic and Research Community

rguzik
Download Presentation

Edupoint Research 2004. Ivana Fastić Pajk & Zoran Birimiša (Users Research and Analysis dpt)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Edupoint Research 2004.Ivana Fastić Pajk & Zoran Birimiša(Users Research and Analysis dpt) project 231-003 TERENA TF – PR, Lyngby, Denmark

  2. About the project.. • Who? • Social Research Institute “Ivo Pilar” • Edupoint – CARNet educational dpt • ZiP - Users Research and Analysis dpt • Where? • Academic and Research Community • Universities of Osijek, Rijeka, Split, Zagreb • When? • February – April 2004 TERENA TF – PR, Lyngby, Denmark

  3. Persons included in projects The core team was assisted (with basic users data and managerial opinion) by two more individuals TERENA TF – PR, Lyngby, Denmark

  4. Why? GOALS • Get an insight of ways and habbits of using IT in Croatian Academic Community. • Check the level of awareness and skills on “informatic” knowledges and skills, determine the most acceptable ways of receiveing IT knowledge. • Find out perception and evaluation of CARNet and specific CARNet services. • Get directions for promotion CARNet services and recommend optimal research ways that would serve to this causes TERENA TF – PR, Lyngby, Denmark

  5. How? METHODOLOGY 1/2 • Qualitative part - 4 focus groups • Edupoint courses participants • 3 groups of student participating at regular courses - regional: Osijek, Rijeka, Split • group of professors participating at in-house courses in Zagreb (semistructured interview) • Quantitative – survey questionnaire • Representative excerpt of 1400 members of Academic and Research Community • 1000 students, 300 professors, 100 researchers • Osijek, Rijeka, Split, Zagreb TERENA TF – PR, Lyngby, Denmark

  6. How? METHODOLOGY 2/2 • Focus groups • Explanation of answers decreases missinterepretation, • Participants interact and participate more • Results can not be interpreted as general • Survey • Low reliability of small groups’ answers • Results should be looked at as a whole, comparing basic foundings and trends TERENA TF – PR, Lyngby, Denmark

  7. What we found out....on CARNet? • More than 40% of students heard about CARNet, but could not list its services • cca 45% professors knows that an e-mail account is among CARNet basic ervice • cca 12% researchers relates CARNet with educational services TERENA TF – PR, Lyngby, Denmark

  8. ...on perception of CARNet? • cca 65% of students perceives CARNet as a part of Academic Community • cca 15% professors perceives CARNet as a part of government TERENA TF – PR, Lyngby, Denmark

  9. ...about “IT literacy” • cca 90% members of Academic Community (feels that they) know how to use MS Win • cca 80% members of Academic Community (feels that they)have skills of Communication via Internet • cca 70% can organize thier desktop and change screen resolution TERENA TF – PR, Lyngby, Denmark

  10. ...about interest for eLearning • cca 40% professors and cca 20% of students are interested in teaching/learning via Internet • More than 35% of students misses the personal approach and interactivness • Almost 35% of teachers points out higher quality of eLearning as a big advantage TERENA TF – PR, Lyngby, Denmark

  11. ...About previous experience and prefered ways of accepting new knowledges • cca 50% participants of the Academic Community learned how to use IT in an extremely selfhandidly way • cca 18% professors would prefer f2f courses in order to fill the knowledge gap at IT field TERENA TF – PR, Lyngby, Denmark

  12. What else did we find out... • How known are specific CARNet services • How many users stopped using modem entrances • How many students use Linux • How many teachers read Edupoint on-line magazine • Which promotional activities of CARNet drow most attention • And a lot more... TERENA TF – PR, Lyngby, Denmark

  13. THANK YOU! Ivana and Zoran ZiP@CARNet.hr TERENA TF – PR, Lyngby, Denmark

More Related