1 / 19

The McGill Educational Initiative on Interprofessional Collaboration: Partnership for Patient and Family Centered Practi

Health-care professionals’ shared and divergent perspectives on interprofessional practice and interprofessional education Redden, K. C., Chin, K., Birlean, C., Steinert, Y., Shore, B. M., & Purden, M. The McGill Educational Initiative on Interprofessional

renjiro
Download Presentation

The McGill Educational Initiative on Interprofessional Collaboration: Partnership for Patient and Family Centered Practi

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Health-care professionals’ shared and divergent perspectives on interprofessional practice and interprofessional educationRedden, K. C., Chin, K., Birlean, C., Steinert, Y., Shore, B. M., & Purden, M. The McGill Educational Initiative on Interprofessional Collaboration: Partnership for Patient and Family Centered Practice Faculty of Medicine McGill University

  2. Introduction • The McGill Group: • Understand and facilitate IPP and IPE in hospital and university settings. • Evaluation Task Force: • Document the group’s development and activities. • Goal of Current Study: • Describe members’ perspectives on IPP and IPE.

  3. Research Questions • What are various health-care professionals’ personal conceptions of IPP and IPE? • What are the perceived benefits and challenges to IPP and IPE? • How do professionals see the relationship between IPP and IPE?

  4. Methods • Participants • N = 9: 4 nurses, 2 doctors, 1 physical therapist, 1 occupational therapist, 1 psychologist • Researcher-developed open-ended interview • Data Analysis and Interpretation • Open & Axial Coding (Strauss & Corbin, 1998) • Saturation and 100% agreement on emerging patterns • Results compared to existing models in literature

  5. Results • Definition of IPP • Associated Benefits and Challenges • Definition of IPE • Associated Benefits and Challenges • Relationship between IPP and IPE

  6. Interpretations • Shared Conceptions: • Benefits and Challenges of IPP and IPE • Definitions of IPE • Divergent Conceptions: • Relationship between IPP and IPE • Definition of IPP: • Environment • Hierarchy • Timing of exposure to IPE • Reflection of D’Amour & Oandasan’s (2005) model

  7. Implications • Generated discussion among members of the team • Baseline data for a longitudinal study focused on this group’s development over the life of this project

  8. Thank You All Together Better Health The McGill Educational Initiative on Interprofessional Collaboration: Partnerships for Family-Centered Practice Health Canada

More Related