1 / 8

Cost-Effective Parallel Computing David Wood and Mark Hill University of Wisconsin IEEE Computer 1995

Cost-Effective Parallel Computing David Wood and Mark Hill University of Wisconsin IEEE Computer 1995. Presented by Eric Wheeler. Theme. Obtaining sub-linear speedups when implementing a multiprocessor can still be worthwhile. Balanced Systems. Amdahl’s Dictum

renardo
Download Presentation

Cost-Effective Parallel Computing David Wood and Mark Hill University of Wisconsin IEEE Computer 1995

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Cost-Effective Parallel ComputingDavid Wood and Mark HillUniversity of WisconsinIEEE Computer 1995 Presented by Eric Wheeler

  2. Theme • Obtaining sub-linear speedups when implementing a multiprocessor can still be worthwhile.

  3. Balanced Systems • Amdahl’s Dictum • For each MIPS of processing power need 1 MB memory. • Converse should be true, too.

  4. Formalism • Speedup simply needs to exceed costup to be “cost-effective”

  5. Remember Memory… • Previous views are processor centric. Memory can dominate cost!

  6. Generalization • When memory dominates, costups can be much smaller than linear in the number of processors.

  7. Takeaways • Balanced systems should be a goal. • Speedups do not have to be linear to be effective thanks to the peripheral costs of adding another whole machine.

  8. Questions • What should you consider as “cost” when deciding if your project design was effective in light of this paper? • What other things can dominate the cost? • What happens to this theory if memory becomes essentially free (e.g. low power, high density, cheap nanoarrays)?

More Related